HB 2097: Judiciary Package; Administrative Drivers License Revocation Hearings; Interactive Conference Technology
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: House
- Latest Version Date: 2026-03-24
Current Status:
Passed
(2026-05-19: Act 017, on 05/19/2026 (Gov. Msg. No. 1117).)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Final Decking
Enacted
Authorizes administrative drivers license revocation hearings to be conducted using interactive conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice over internet protocol systems. Clarifies that evidence in hearings conducted via interactive conference technology may be submitted and exchanged electronically. (SD1)
Authorizes administrative drivers license revocation hearings to be conducted using interactive conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice over internet protocol (VoIP) systems. Clarifies that evidence in hearings conducted via interactive conference technology may be submitted and exchanged electronically. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Authorizes administrative drivers license revocation hearings to be conducted using interactive conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice over internet protocol (VoIP) systems. Clarifies that evidence in hearings conducted via interactive conference technology may be submitted and exchanged electronically.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2097 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
H.D. 1 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
S.D. 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE DRIVERS LICENSE REVOCATION.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 291E-34, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:
"(e) The notice shall state that, if the respondent's license and privilege to operate a vehicle is administratively revoked after the review, a decision shall be mailed to the respondent, or to the parent or guardian of the respondent if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, that shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
(1) The reasons why the respondent's license and privilege to operate a vehicle is administratively revoked;
(2) That the respondent may request the director, within six days of the date the decision is mailed, to schedule an administrative hearing to review the administrative revocation;
(3) That, if the respondent's request for an administrative hearing is received by the director within six days of the date the decision was mailed, the hearing shall be scheduled to commence:
(A) No later than twenty-five days after the date of the issuance of the notice of administrative revocation in the case of an alcohol related offense; and
(B) No later than thirty-nine days after the date of the issuance of the notice of administrative revocation in the case of a drug related offense;
(4) The procedure to request an administrative hearing;
(5) That failure to request an administrative hearing within the time provided shall cause the administrative revocation to take effect for the period and under the conditions established by the director in the decision;
(6) That the respondent may regain the right to a hearing by requesting the director, within sixty days after the issuance of the notice of administrative revocation, to schedule a hearing;
(7) That the director
shall schedule the hearing to commence no later than thirty days after a
request under paragraph (6) is received, but that, except as provided in
section [291E-38(j),] 291E-38(k), the temporary permit shall not
be extended if the respondent fails to request an administrative hearing within
the initial six-day period provided for that purpose;
(8) That failure to attend the hearing shall cause the administrative revocation to take effect for the period and under the conditions indicated;
(9) The duration of the administrative revocation and other conditions that may be imposed, including: referral to the driver's education program for an assessment of the respondent's substance abuse or dependence and the need for treatment; and
(10) That the respondent shall obtain an ignition interlock permit in order to operate a vehicle during the revocation period if the respondent had a valid license at the time of the arrest."
SECTION 2. Section 291E-38, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§291E-38 Administrative hearing; procedure; decision. (a) If the director administratively revokes the respondent's license and privilege to operate a vehicle after the administrative review, the respondent may request an administrative hearing to review the decision within six days of the date the administrative review decision is mailed. If the request for hearing is received by the director within six days of the date the decision is mailed, the hearing shall be scheduled to commence no later than:
(1) Twenty-five days from the date the notice of administrative revocation was issued in a case involving an alcohol related offense; or
(2) Thirty-nine days from the date the notice of administrative revocation was issued in a case involving a drug related offense.
The director may continue the hearing only as
provided in subsection [(j).] (k).
(b) The hearing shall be held at a place designated by the director, as close to the location where the notice of administrative revocation was issued as practical.
(c) The hearing may be held by interactive conference technology that allows interaction by the director, any party, and counsel, if retained by the party. An administrative hearing held by interactive conference technology shall be recessed for up to one hour when audio communication cannot be maintained; provided that the hearing may reconvene only when audio communication is reestablished. If audio-only communication is reestablished, then each speaker shall state the speaker's name before making remarks.
For the purposes of this subsection, "interactive conference technology" means any form of audio or audio and visual conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice over internet protocol, that may be used to facilitate interaction between the director, any party, and counsel, if retained by the party, in a hearing conducted under this section.
[(c)] (d) The respondent may be represented by counsel
and, if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, [must] shall
be accompanied by a parent or guardian.
[(d)] (e) The director shall conduct the hearing and
have authority to:
(1) Administer oaths and affirmations;
(2) Examine witnesses and take testimony;
(3) Receive and determine the relevance of evidence; provided that if the hearing is held by interactive conference technology, as provided in subsection (c), evidence may be submitted and exchanged by electronic means;
(4) Issue subpoenas;
(5) Regulate the course and conduct of the hearing; and
(6) Make a final ruling.
[(e)] (f) The director shall affirm the administrative
revocation only if the director determines that:
(1) There existed reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle, the vehicle was stopped at an intoxicant control roadblock established and operated in compliance with sections 291E‑19 and 291E‑20, or the person was tested pursuant to section 291E‑21;
(2) There existed probable cause to believe that the respondent operated the vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant; and
(3) The evidence proves by a preponderance that:
(A) The respondent operated the vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant; or
(B) The respondent operated the vehicle and refused to submit to a breath, blood, or urine test after being informed:
(i) That the person may refuse to submit to testing in compliance with section 291E-11; and
(ii) Of the sanctions of this part and then asked if the person still refuses to submit to a breath, blood, or urine test in compliance with the requirements of section 291E-15.
[(f)] (g) The respondent's prior alcohol and drug
enforcement contacts shall be entered into evidence.
[(g)] (h) The sworn statements provided in section
291E-36 shall be admitted into evidence.
The director shall consider the sworn statements in the absence of the
law enforcement officer or other person.
Upon written notice to the director, no later than five days [prior
to] before the hearing, that the respondent wishes to examine a law
enforcement officer or other person who made a sworn statement, the director
shall issue a subpoena for the officer or other person to appear at the
hearing. Personal service upon the law
enforcement officer or other person who made a sworn statement shall be made no
later than forty-eight hours [prior to] before the hearing
time. If the officer or other person
cannot appear, the officer or other person at the discretion of the director,
may testify by telephone.
[(h)] (i) The hearing shall be recorded in a manner to
be determined by the director.
[(i)] (j) The director's decision shall be rendered in
writing and mailed to the respondent, or to the parent or guardian of the
respondent if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, no later than five
days after the hearing is concluded. If
the decision is to reverse the administrative revocation, the director shall
return the respondent's license, along with a certified statement that
administrative revocation proceedings have been terminated. If the decision sustains the administrative
revocation, the director shall mail to the respondent a written decision
indicating the duration of the administrative revocation and any other
conditions or restrictions as may be imposed pursuant to section 291E‑41.
[(j)] (k) For good cause shown, the director may grant
a continuance either of the commencement of the hearing or of a hearing that
has already commenced. If a continuance
is granted at the request of the director, the director shall extend the
validity of the temporary permit, unless otherwise prohibited, for a period not
to exceed the period of the continuance.
If a continuance is granted at the request of the respondent, the
director shall not extend the validity of the temporary permit. For purposes of this section, a continuance
means a delay in the commencement of the hearing or an interruption of a
hearing that has commenced, other than for recesses during the day or at the
end of the day or week. The absence from
the hearing of a law enforcement officer or other person, upon whom personal
service of a subpoena has been made as set forth in subsection [(g),] (h),
constitutes good cause for a continuance.
[(k)] (l) The
director may grant a special motor vehicle registration, pursuant to section
291E-48, to a qualified household member or a co-owner of any motor vehicle
upon determination that:
(1) The person is completely dependent on the motor vehicle for the necessities of life; and
(2) At the time of the application for a special motor vehicle registration, the respondent does not have a valid ignition interlock permit.
The special motor vehicle registration shall not be valid for use by the respondent.
[(l)] (m) If the respondent fails to appear at the
hearing, or if a respondent under the age of eighteen fails to appear with a
parent or guardian, administrative revocation shall take effect for the period
and under the conditions established by the director in the administrative
review decision issued by the director under section 291E‑37."
SECTION 3. Section 291E-46, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§291E-46
Computation of time. The time
in which any act provided in this part is to be done is computed by excluding
the first day and including the last, unless the last day is a Saturday,
Sunday, or state holiday, and then it also is excluded; provided that if the
last day for the mailing of decisions under sections 291E-37(a) and [291E-38(i)]
291E-38(j) is a federal holiday, it also is excluded."
SECTION 4. Section 291E-48, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
"(a) Anytime after the effective date of
revocation or after the administrative hearing decision is mailed pursuant to
section [291E-38(i),] 291E-38(j), a qualified household member or
co-owner of a motor vehicle with a respondent who has had a motor vehicle
registration revoked under this part may submit a sworn statement to the
director requesting a special motor vehicle registration. The director may grant the request upon
determining that the following conditions have been met:
(1) The applicant is a household member of the respondent's or a co-owner of the vehicle;
(2) The applicant has a license that has not expired or been suspended or revoked;
(3) The applicant is completely dependent on the motor vehicle for the necessities of life;
(4) The director finds that the applicant will take reasonable precautions to ensure that the respondent will not drive the vehicle; and
(5) The respondent does not have a valid ignition interlock permit.
A person to whom a special motor vehicle registration has been granted shall apply to the director of the appropriate county agency for special series number plates, as provided in section 249-9.4."
SECTION 5. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 6. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Report Title:
Judiciary Package; Administrative Drivers License Revocation Hearings; Interactive Conference Technology
Description:
Authorizes administrative drivers license revocation hearings to be conducted using interactive conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice over internet protocol systems. Clarifies that evidence in hearings conducted via interactive conference technology may be submitted and exchanged electronically. (SD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2097 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
H.D. 1 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE DRIVERS LICENSE REVOCATION.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 291E-34, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:
"(e) The notice shall state that, if the respondent's license and privilege to operate a vehicle is administratively revoked after the review, a decision shall be mailed to the respondent, or to the parent or guardian of the respondent if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, that shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
(1) The reasons why the respondent's license and privilege to operate a vehicle is administratively revoked;
(2) That the respondent may request the director, within six days of the date the decision is mailed, to schedule an administrative hearing to review the administrative revocation;
(3) That, if the respondent's request for an administrative hearing is received by the director within six days of the date the decision was mailed, the hearing shall be scheduled to commence:
(A) No later than twenty-five days after the date of the issuance of the notice of administrative revocation in the case of an alcohol related offense; and
(B) No later than thirty-nine days after the date of the issuance of the notice of administrative revocation in the case of a drug related offense;
(4) The procedure to request an administrative hearing;
(5) That failure to request an administrative hearing within the time provided shall cause the administrative revocation to take effect for the period and under the conditions established by the director in the decision;
(6) That the respondent may regain the right to a hearing by requesting the director, within sixty days after the issuance of the notice of administrative revocation, to schedule a hearing;
(7) That the director
shall schedule the hearing to commence no later than thirty days after a
request under paragraph (6) is received, but that, except as provided in
section [291E-38(j),] 291E-38(k), the temporary permit shall not
be extended if the respondent fails to request an administrative hearing within
the initial six-day period provided for that purpose;
(8) That failure to attend the hearing shall cause the administrative revocation to take effect for the period and under the conditions indicated;
(9) The duration of the administrative revocation and other conditions that may be imposed, including: referral to the driver's education program for an assessment of the respondent's substance abuse or dependence and the need for treatment; and
(10) That the respondent shall obtain an ignition interlock permit in order to operate a vehicle during the revocation period if the respondent had a valid license at the time of the arrest."
SECTION 2. Section 291E-38, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§291E-38 Administrative hearing; procedure; decision. (a) If the director administratively revokes the respondent's license and privilege to operate a vehicle after the administrative review, the respondent may request an administrative hearing to review the decision within six days of the date the administrative review decision is mailed. If the request for hearing is received by the director within six days of the date the decision is mailed, the hearing shall be scheduled to commence no later than:
(1) Twenty-five days from the date the notice of administrative revocation was issued in a case involving an alcohol related offense; or
(2) Thirty-nine days from the date the notice of administrative revocation was issued in a case involving a drug related offense.
The director may continue the hearing only as
provided in subsection [(j).] (k).
(b) The hearing shall be held at a place designated by the director, as close to the location where the notice of administrative revocation was issued as practical.
(c) The hearing may be held by interactive conference technology that allows interaction by the director, any party, and counsel, if retained by the party. An administrative hearing held by interactive conference technology shall be recessed for up to one hour when audio communication cannot be maintained; provided that the hearing may reconvene when only audio communication is reestablished. If audio-only communication is reestablished, then each speaker shall state the speaker's name before making remarks.
For the purposes of this subsection, "interactive conference technology" means any form of audio or audio and visual conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice over internet protocol, that may be used to facilitate interaction between the director, any party, and counsel, if retained by the party, in a hearing conducted under this section.
[(c)] (d) The respondent may be represented by counsel
and, if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, [must] shall
be accompanied by a parent or guardian.
[(d)] (e) The director shall conduct the hearing and
have authority to:
(1) Administer oaths and affirmations;
(2) Examine witnesses and take testimony;
(3) Receive and determine the relevance of evidence; provided that if the hearing is held by interactive conference technology, as provided in subsection (c), evidence may be submitted and exchanged by electronic means;
(4) Issue subpoenas;
(5) Regulate the course and conduct of the hearing; and
(6) Make a final ruling.
[(e)] (f) The director shall affirm the administrative
revocation only if the director determines that:
(1) There existed reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle, the vehicle was stopped at an intoxicant control roadblock established and operated in compliance with sections 291E‑19 and 291E‑20, or the person was tested pursuant to section 291E‑21;
(2) There existed probable cause to believe that the respondent operated the vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant; and
(3) The evidence proves by a preponderance that:
(A) The respondent operated the vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant; or
(B) The respondent operated the vehicle and refused to submit to a breath, blood, or urine test after being informed:
(i) That the person may refuse to submit to testing in compliance with section 291E-11; and
(ii) Of the sanctions of this part and then asked if the person still refuses to submit to a breath, blood, or urine test in compliance with the requirements of section 291E-15.
[(f)] (g) The respondent's prior alcohol and drug
enforcement contacts shall be entered into evidence.
[(g)] (h) The sworn statements provided in section
291E-36 shall be admitted into evidence.
The director shall consider the sworn statements in the absence of the
law enforcement officer or other person.
Upon written notice to the director, no later than five days [prior
to] before the hearing, that the respondent wishes to examine a law
enforcement officer or other person who made a sworn statement, the director
shall issue a subpoena for the officer or other person to appear at the
hearing. Personal service upon the law
enforcement officer or other person who made a sworn statement shall be made no
later than forty-eight hours [prior to] before the hearing
time. If the officer or other person
cannot appear, the officer or other person at the discretion of the director,
may testify by telephone.
[(h)] (i) The hearing shall be recorded in a manner to
be determined by the director.
[(i)] (j) The director's decision shall be rendered in
writing and mailed to the respondent, or to the parent or guardian of the
respondent if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, no later than five
days after the hearing is concluded. If
the decision is to reverse the administrative revocation, the director shall
return the respondent's license, along with a certified statement that
administrative revocation proceedings have been terminated. If the decision sustains the administrative
revocation, the director shall mail to the respondent a written decision
indicating the duration of the administrative revocation and any other
conditions or restrictions as may be imposed pursuant to section 291E‑41.
[(j)] (k) For good cause shown, the director may grant
a continuance either of the commencement of the hearing or of a hearing that
has already commenced. If a continuance
is granted at the request of the director, the director shall extend the
validity of the temporary permit, unless otherwise prohibited, for a period not
to exceed the period of the continuance.
If a continuance is granted at the request of the respondent, the
director shall not extend the validity of the temporary permit. For purposes of this section, a continuance
means a delay in the commencement of the hearing or an interruption of a
hearing that has commenced, other than for recesses during the day or at the
end of the day or week. The absence from
the hearing of a law enforcement officer or other person, upon whom personal
service of a subpoena has been made as set forth in subsection [(g),] (h),
constitutes good cause for a continuance.
[(k)] (l) The
director may grant a special motor vehicle registration, pursuant to section
291E-48, to a qualified household member or a co-owner of any motor vehicle
upon determination that:
(1) The person is completely dependent on the motor vehicle for the necessities of life; and
(2) At the time of the application for a special motor vehicle registration, the respondent does not have a valid ignition interlock permit.
The special motor vehicle registration shall not be valid for use by the respondent.
[(l)] (m) If the respondent fails to appear at the
hearing, or if a respondent under the age of eighteen fails to appear with a
parent or guardian, administrative revocation shall take effect for the period
and under the conditions established by the director in the administrative
review decision issued by the director under section 291E‑37."
SECTION 3. Section 291E-46, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§291E-46
Computation of time. The time
in which any act provided in this part is to be done is computed by excluding
the first day and including the last, unless the last day is a Saturday,
Sunday, or state holiday, and then it also is excluded; provided that if the
last day for the mailing of decisions under sections 291E-37(a) and [291E-38(i)]
291E-38(j) is a federal holiday, it also is excluded."
SECTION 4. Section 291E-48, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
"(a) Anytime after the effective date of
revocation or after the administrative hearing decision is mailed pursuant to
section [291E-38(i),] 291E-38(j), a qualified household member or
co-owner of a motor vehicle with a respondent who has had a motor vehicle
registration revoked under this part may submit a sworn statement to the
director requesting a special motor vehicle registration. The director may grant the request upon
determining that the following conditions have been met:
(1) The applicant is a household member of the respondent's or a co-owner of the vehicle;
(2) The applicant has a license that has not expired or been suspended or revoked;
(3) The applicant is completely dependent on the motor vehicle for the necessities of life;
(4) The director finds that the applicant will take reasonable precautions to ensure that the respondent will not drive the vehicle; and
(5) The respondent does not have a valid ignition interlock permit.
A person to whom a special motor vehicle registration has been granted shall apply to the director of the appropriate county agency for special series number plates, as provided in section 249-9.4."
SECTION 5. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 6. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Report Title:
Judiciary Package; Administrative Drivers License Revocation Hearings; Interactive Conference Technology
Description:
Authorizes administrative drivers license revocation hearings to be conducted using interactive conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice over internet protocol (VoIP) systems. Clarifies that evidence in hearings conducted via interactive conference technology may be submitted and exchanged electronically. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2097 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
|
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE DRIVERS LICENSE REVOCATION.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 291E-38, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§291E-38 Administrative hearing; procedure; decision. (a) If the director administratively revokes the respondent's license and privilege to operate a vehicle after the administrative review, the respondent may request an administrative hearing to review the decision within six days of the date the administrative review decision is mailed. If the request for hearing is received by the director within six days of the date the decision is mailed, the hearing shall be scheduled to commence no later than:
(1) Twenty-five days from the date the notice of administrative revocation was issued in a case involving an alcohol related offense; or
(2) Thirty-nine days from the date the notice of administrative revocation was issued in a case involving a drug related offense.
The director may continue the hearing only as
provided in subsection [(j).] (k).
(b) The hearing shall be held at a place designated by the director, as close to the location where the notice of administrative revocation was issued as practical.
(c) The hearing may be held by interactive conference technology that allows interaction by the director, any party, and counsel if retained by the party. An administrative hearing held by interactive conference technology shall be recessed for up to one hour when audio communication cannot be maintained; provided that the hearing may reconvene when only audio communication is reestablished. If audio-only communication is reestablished, then each speaker shall state the speaker's name prior to making remarks.
For the purposes of this subsection, "interactive conference technology" means any form of audio or audio and visual conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice over internet protocol, that may be used to facilitate interaction between the director, any party, and counsel if retained by the party, in a hearing conducted under this section.
[(c)] (d) The respondent may be represented by counsel
and, if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, must be accompanied by a
parent or guardian.
[(d)] (e) The director shall conduct the hearing and
have authority to:
(1) Administer oaths and affirmations;
(2) Examine witnesses and take testimony;
(3) Receive and determine the relevance of evidence; provided that if the hearing is held by interactive conference technology, as provided in subsection (c), evidence may be submitted and exchanged by electronic means;
(4) Issue subpoenas;
(5) Regulate the course and conduct of the hearing; and
(6) Make a final ruling.
[(e)] (f) The director shall affirm the administrative
revocation only if the director determines that:
(1) There existed reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle, the vehicle was stopped at an intoxicant control roadblock established and operated in compliance with sections 291E‑19 and 291E‑20, or the person was tested pursuant to section 291E‑21;
(2) There existed probable cause to believe that the respondent operated the vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant; and
(3) The evidence proves by a preponderance that:
(A) The respondent operated the vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant; or
(B) The respondent operated the vehicle and refused to submit to a breath, blood, or urine test after being informed:
(i) That the person may refuse to submit to testing in compliance with section 291E-11; and
(ii) Of the sanctions of this part and then asked if the person still refuses to submit to a breath, blood, or urine test in compliance with the requirements of section 291E-15.
[(f)] (g) The respondent's prior alcohol and drug
enforcement contacts shall be entered into evidence.
[(g)] (h) The sworn statements provided in section
291E-36 shall be admitted into evidence.
The director shall consider the sworn statements in the absence of the
law enforcement officer or other person.
Upon written notice to the director, no later than five days prior to
the hearing, that the respondent wishes to examine a law enforcement officer or
other person who made a sworn statement, the director shall issue a subpoena
for the officer or other person to appear at the hearing. Personal service upon the law enforcement
officer or other person who made a sworn statement shall be made no later than
forty-eight hours prior to the hearing time.
If the officer or other person cannot appear, the officer or other person
at the discretion of the director, may testify by telephone.
[(h)] (i) The hearing shall be recorded in a manner to
be determined by the director.
[(i)] (j) The director's decision shall be rendered in
writing and mailed to the respondent, or to the parent or guardian of the
respondent if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, no later than five
days after the hearing is concluded. If
the decision is to reverse the administrative revocation, the director shall
return the respondent's license, along with a certified statement that
administrative revocation proceedings have been terminated. If the decision sustains the administrative
revocation, the director shall mail to the respondent a written decision
indicating the duration of the administrative revocation and any other
conditions or restrictions as may be imposed pursuant to section 291E‑41.
[(j)] (k) For good cause shown, the director may grant
a continuance either of the commencement of the hearing or of a hearing that
has already commenced. If a continuance
is granted at the request of the director, the director shall extend the
validity of the temporary permit, unless otherwise prohibited, for a period not
to exceed the period of the continuance.
If a continuance is granted at the request of the respondent, the
director shall not extend the validity of the temporary permit. For purposes of this section, a continuance
means a delay in the commencement of the hearing or an interruption of a
hearing that has commenced, other than for recesses during the day or at the
end of the day or week. The absence from
the hearing of a law enforcement officer or other person, upon whom personal
service of a subpoena has been made as set forth in subsection [(g),] (h),
constitutes good cause for a continuance.
[(k)] (l) The
director may grant a special motor vehicle registration, pursuant to section
291E-48, to a qualified household member or a co-owner of any motor vehicle
upon determination that:
(1) The person is completely dependent on the motor vehicle for the necessities of life; and
(2) At the time of the application for a special motor vehicle registration, the respondent does not have a valid ignition interlock permit.
The special motor vehicle registration shall not be valid for use by the respondent.
[(l)] (m) If the respondent fails to appear at the
hearing, or if a respondent under the age of eighteen fails to appear with a
parent or guardian, administrative revocation shall take effect for the period
and under the conditions established by the director in the administrative
review decision issued by the director under section 291E‑37."
SECTION 2. Section 291E-46, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§291E-46
Computation of time. The time
in which any act provided in this part is to be done is computed by excluding
the first day and including the last, unless the last day is a Saturday,
Sunday, or state holiday, and then it also is excluded; provided that if the
last day for the mailing of decisions under sections 291E-37(a) and [291E-38(i)]
291E-38(j) is a federal holiday, it also is excluded."
SECTION 3. Section 291E-48, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
"(a) Anytime after the effective date of
revocation or after the administrative hearing decision is mailed pursuant to
section [291E-38(i),] 291E-38(j), a qualified household member or
co-owner of a motor vehicle with a respondent who has had a motor vehicle
registration revoked under this part may submit a sworn statement to the
director requesting a special motor vehicle registration. The director may grant the request upon
determining that the following conditions have been met:
(1) The applicant is a household member of the respondent's or a co-owner of the vehicle;
(2) The applicant has a license that has not expired or been suspended or revoked;
(3) The applicant is completely dependent on the motor vehicle for the necessities of life;
(4) The director finds that the applicant will take reasonable precautions to ensure that the respondent will not drive the vehicle; and
(5) The respondent does not have a valid ignition interlock permit.
A person to whom a special motor vehicle registration has been granted shall apply to the director of the appropriate county agency for special series number plates, as provided in section 249-9.4."
SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
|
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
By Request |
Report Title:
Judiciary Package; Administrative Drivers License Revocation Hearings; Interactive Conference Technology
Description:
Authorizes administrative drivers license revocation hearings to be conducted using interactive conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice over internet protocol (VoIP) systems. Clarifies that evidence in hearings conducted via interactive conference technology may be submitted and exchanged electronically.
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | Act 017, on 05/19/2026 (Gov. Msg. No. 1117). |
| May 19, 2026 | Act 017, 05/19/2026 (Gov. Msg. No. 1117). |
| Apr 24, 2026 | Received notice of passage on Final Reading in House (Hse. Com. No. 823). |
| Apr 23, 2026 | Transmitted to Governor. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | Passed Final Reading as amended in SD 1 with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Evslin excused (1). |
| Apr 23, 2026 | House agrees to Senate amendment(s). |
| Apr 23, 2026 | Received notice of House reconsideration of action in disagreeing to the amendments proposed by the Senate (Hse. Com. No. 815). |
| Apr 22, 2026 | Reconsideration of action taken on 04-16-26. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | Received notice of disagreement (Hse. Com. No. 780). |
| Apr 16, 2026 | House disagrees with Senate amendment (s). |
| Apr 14, 2026 | Returned from Senate (Sen. Com. No. 660) in amended form (SD 1). |
| Apr 14, 2026 | Report adopted; Passed Third Reading. Ayes, 25; Aye(s) with reservations: none . Noes, 0 (none). Excused, 0 (none). Transmitted to House. |
| Apr 10, 2026 | One Day Notice 04-14-26. |
| Apr 10, 2026 | Reported from JDC (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 3790) with recommendation of passage on Third Reading. |
| Apr 7, 2026 | The committee(s) on JDC recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, UNAMENDED. The votes in JDC were as follows: 4 Aye(s): Senator(s) Rhoads, Gabbard, Chang, San Buenaventura; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 1 Excused: Senator(s) Awa. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | The committee(s) on JDC will hold a public decision making on 04-07-26 10:15AM; Conference Room 016 & Videoconference. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referred to JDC. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | Reported from TRS/LBT (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 3164) with recommendation of passage on Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referral to JDC. |
| Mar 19, 2026 | The committee(s) on TRS recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in TRS were as follows: 3 Aye(s): Senator(s) Inouye, Elefante, DeCorte; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 2 Excused: Senator(s) Kanuha, Lee, C.. |
| Mar 19, 2026 | The committee(s) on LBT recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in LBT were as follows: 3 Aye(s): Senator(s) Elefante, Lamosao, Fevella; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 2 Excused: Senator(s) Ihara, Moriwaki. |
| Mar 16, 2026 | The committee(s) on TRS/LBT has scheduled a public hearing on 03-19-26 3:00PM; Conference Room 229 & Videoconference. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Referred to TRS/LBT, JDC. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Passed First Reading. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 354). |
| Mar 10, 2026 | Passed Third Reading with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Kong, Pierick excused (2). Transmitted to Senate. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1; placed on the calendar for Third Reading with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Perruso excused (1). |
| Mar 5, 2026 | Reported from JHA (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 906-26) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and placement on the calendar for Third Reading. |
| Feb 4, 2026 | The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 10 Ayes: Representative(s) Tarnas, Poepoe, Belatti, Cochran, Hashem, Kahaloa, Sayama, Takayama, Garcia, Shimizu; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and Excused: none. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | Bill scheduled to be heard by JHA on Wednesday, 02-04-26 2:00PM in House conference room 325 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | Referred to JHA, referral sheet 3 |
| Jan 26, 2026 | Introduced and Pass First Reading. |
| Jan 23, 2026 | Pending introduction. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | Final Reading | House Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 14, 2026 | Third Reading | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 7, 2026 | The committee(s) on JDC recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, UNAMENDED | Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
|
| Mar 19, 2026 | The committee(s) on TRS recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | Senate Standing Committee on Transportation |
Passed |
|
| Mar 19, 2026 | The committee(s) on LBT recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | Senate Standing Committee on Labor and Technology |
Passed |
|
| Mar 10, 2026 | Third Reading | House Floor |
Passed |
|
| Feb 4, 2026 | The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | House Standing Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office | *** Support | Apr 6, 2026 |
| Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office | *** Support | Feb 4, 2026 |
| Department of Transportation | *** Support | Mar 19, 2026 |
| Department of Transportation, State of Hawaiʻi | *** Support | Apr 6, 2026 |
| The Judiciary, State of Hawaiʻi | *** Support | Apr 6, 2026 |
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 906-26
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2026
RE: H.B. No. 2097
H.D. 1
Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura
Speaker, House of Representatives
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2026
State of Hawaii
Madame:
Your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs, to which was referred H.B. No. 2097 entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE DRIVERS LICENSE REVOCATION,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose of this measure is to:
(1) Authorize administrative drivers license revocation hearings to be conducted using interactive conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice over internet protocol (VoIP) systems; and
(2) Clarify that evidence in hearings conducted via interactive conference technology may be submitted and exchanged electronically.
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Judiciary.
Your Committee finds that administrative driver's license revocation hearings are time-sensitive proceedings that must be conducted efficiently while preserving due process for respondents. Your Committee further finds that authorizing the use of interactive conference technology for these hearings can improve access to justice, reduce delays, and promote the timely resolution of cases, particularly when in-person appearances are impractical. Allowing electronic submission and exchange of evidence in hearings conducted by interactive conference technology modernizes the administrative hearing process while maintaining fairness, reliability, and procedural integrity.
Your Committee has amended this measure by making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2097, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2097, H.D. 1, and be placed on the calendar for Third Reading.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs,
|
|
|
____________________________ DAVID A. TARNAS, Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
Testimony PDF
|
|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026 | HB2097_SD1_TESTIMONY_JDC_04-07-26_.PDF |
| Mar 19, 2026 | HB2097_HD1_TESTIMONY_TRS-LBT_03-19-26_.PDF |
| Feb 4, 2026 | HB2097_TESTIMONY_JHA_02-04-26_.PDF |
Discussed in Hearing
Senate Standing Committee on Labor and Technology
Senate Standing Committee on Transportation
House Standing Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
House Standing Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):