HB 534: Uniform Packaging and Labeling; Food Labeling; Country of Origin; Tuna; Raw Processed Ahi; Unfair and Deceptive Practices
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: House
- Latest Version Date: 2025-04-25
Current Status:
In Progress
(2025-06-27: Act 238, on 06/27/2025 (Gov. Msg. No. 1340).)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Final Decking
Enacted
Prohibits the sale of any raw processed ahi by retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed. Effective 7/1/2026. (CD1)
Prohibits the sale of any processed food item with raw ahi product as an ingredient by retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed. Effective 7/1/2050. (SD1)
Prohibits the sale of any processed food item with raw ahi product as an ingredient in retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD2)
Prohibits the sale of processed ahi in retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Prohibits the sale of raw ahi and raw ahi products in retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
534 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 |
H.D. 2 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
S.D. 1 |
|
|
|
C.D. 1 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO LABELING REQUIREMENTS.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
According to statistics from the United States Department of Commerce, the annual dockside value of commercial yellowfin and bigeye tuna (marked as ahi) landed in Hawaii's ports is around $100,000,000, making tuna the highest valued food commodity produced in the State. Even with these impressive landings, previously frozen and carbon monoxide-treated foreign imported tuna dominates sales at local retail establishments. Due to a loophole in federal country of origin labeling requirements for seafood, retail establishments are not providing consumers with information on where the ahi tuna originates. The legislature is therefore concerned that most consumers that buy ahi at local retail establishments falsely believe that previously frozen, gas-treated ahi is caught by Hawaii fisheries.
Moreover, the legislature further notes that the majority of ahi sold at local retail establishments is in the form of poke and sushi products. Consumers of poke are commonly subjected to misleading advertisements and in-store terminology, such as "prepared fresh", "freshly made", and "locally made", while the ahi used to prepare the poke is foreign-sourced, previously frozen, gas-treated, and imported in pre-cut cubes.
Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to prohibit the sale of raw processed ahi at Hawaii retail establishments without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
SECTION 2. Chapter 486, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to part V to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§486- Raw processed ahi; labeling requirements; retail establishments. (a) No retail establishment shall keep, offer, display, expose for sale, or solicit for the sale of any raw processed ahi without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
(b) As used in this section:
"Ahi" means yellowfin tuna or bigeye tuna, including farm-raised fish and ahi that meets the definition of "wild fish and shellfish" as defined in title 7 Code of Federal Regulations section 60.133, as amended.
"Farm-raised fish" has the same meaning as defined in title 7 Code of Federal Regulations section 60.106, as amended.
"Raw processed ahi" means a retail item derived from ahi that has undergone transformation by methods including but not limited to cutting, cubing, slicing, and mincing or has been combined with any ingredients (e.g., soy sauce, onions, limu, etc.) and offered for sale.
"Retail establishment" means an establishment licensed under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930, which includes any retail establishment that purchases over $230,000 of fresh or frozen produce per calendar year."
SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2026.
Report Title:
Uniform Packaging and Labeling; Food Labeling; Country of Origin; Tuna; Raw Processed Ahi; Unfair and Deceptive Practices
Description:
Prohibits the sale of any raw processed ahi by retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed. Effective 7/1/2026. (CD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
534 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 |
H.D. 2 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
S.D. 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO LABELING REQUIREMENTS.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
According to statistics from the United States Department of Commerce, the annual dockside value of commercial yellowfin and bigeye tuna (marked as ahi) landed in Hawaii's ports is around $100,000,000, making tuna the highest valued food commodity produced in the State. Even with these impressive landings, previously frozen and carbon monoxide-treated foreign imported tuna dominates sales at local retail establishments. Due to a loophole in federal country of origin labeling requirements for seafood, retail establishments are not providing consumers with information on where the ahi tuna originates. The legislature is therefore concerned that most consumers that buy ahi at local retail establishments falsely believe that previously frozen, gas-treated ahi is caught by Hawaii fisheries.
Moreover, the legislature further notes that the majority of raw ahi sold at local retail establishments is in the form of poke and sushi products. Consumers of poke are commonly subjected to misleading advertisements and in-store terminology, such as "prepared fresh", "freshly made", and "locally made", while the ahi used to prepare the poke is foreign-sourced, previously frozen, gas-treated, and imported in pre-cut cubes.
Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to prohibit the sale of processed food items with raw ahi products as an ingredient at Hawaii retail establishments without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
SECTION 2. Chapter 481B, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to part I to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§481B- Raw processed ahi; labeling requirements; retail establishments. (a) No retail establishment shall keep, offer, display, expose for sale, or solicit for the sale of any raw ahi product that is an ingredient in a processed food item without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
(b) For the purposes of this section:
"Ahi" means yellowfin tuna or bigeye tuna, including farm-raised fish and yellowfin tuna or bigeye tuna that meets the definition of "wild fish and shellfish" as defined in title 7 Code of Federal Regulations section 60.133, as amended.
"Farm-raised fish" has the same meaning as defined in title 7 Code of Federal Regulations section 60.106, as amended.
"Retail establishment" means an establishment:
(1) Licensed under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930; and
(2) That purchases over $230,000 of fresh or frozen produce per calendar year."
SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2050.
Report Title:
Uniform Packaging and Labeling; Food Labeling; Country of Origin; Tuna; Raw Ahi Product; Unfair and Deceptive Practices
Description:
Prohibits the sale of any processed food item with raw ahi product as an ingredient by retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed. Effective 7/1/2050. (SD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
534 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 |
H.D. 2 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO LABELING REQUIREMENTS.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
According to statistics from the United States Department of Commerce, the annual dockside value of commercial yellowfin and bigeye tuna (marked as ahi) landed in Hawaii's ports is around $100,000,000, making tuna the highest valued food commodity produced in the State. Even with these impressive landings, previously frozen and carbon monoxide-treated foreign imported tuna dominates sales at local retail establishments. Due to a loophole in federal country of origin labeling requirements for seafood, retail establishments are not providing consumers with information on where the ahi tuna originates. The legislature is therefore concerned that most consumers that buy ahi at local retail establishments falsely believe that previously frozen, gas-treated ahi is caught by Hawaii fisheries.
Moreover, the legislature further notes that the majority of ahi sold at local retail establishments is in the form of poke and sushi products. Consumers of poke are commonly subjected to misleading advertisements and in-store terminology, such as "prepared fresh", "freshly made", and "locally made", while the ahi used to prepare the poke is foreign-sourced, previously frozen, gas-treated, and imported in pre-cut cubes.
Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to prohibit the sale of processed food items with raw ahi products as an ingredient at Hawaii retail establishments without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
SECTION 2. Chapter 481B, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to part I to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§481B- Raw processed ahi; labeling requirements; retail establishments. (a) No retail establishment shall keep, offer, display, expose for sale, or solicit for the sale of any raw ahi product that is an ingredient in a processed food item without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
(b) As used in this section:
"Ahi" means yellowfin tuna or bigeye tuna, including farm-raised fish and yellowfin tuna or bigeye tuna that meets the definition of "wild fish and shellfish" as defined in title 7 Code of Federal Regulations section 60.133, as amended.
"Farm-raised fish" has the same meaning as defined in title 7 Code of Federal Regulations section 60.106, as amended.
"Retail establishment" means an establishment:
(1) Licensed under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930; and
(2) That purchases over $230,000 of fresh or frozen produce per calendar year."
SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Report Title:
Measurement Standards; Uniform Packaging and Labeling; Food Labeling; Country of Origin; Tuna; Raw Ahi Product
Description:
Prohibits the sale of any processed food item with raw ahi product as an ingredient in retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD2)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
534 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 |
H.D. 1 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO LABELING REQUIREMENTS.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
According to statistics from the United States Department of Commerce, the annual dockside value of commercial yellowfin and bigeye tuna (marked as ahi) landed in Hawaii's ports is around $100,000,000, making tuna the highest valued food commodity produced in the State. Even with these impressive landings, previously frozen and carbon monoxide-treated foreign imported tuna dominates sales at local retail establishments. Due to a loophole in federal country of origin labeling requirements for seafood, retail establishments are not providing consumers with information on where the ahi tuna originates. The legislature is therefore concerned that most consumers that buy ahi at local retail establishments falsely believe that previously frozen, gas-treated ahi is caught by Hawaii fisheries.
Moreover, the legislature further notes that the majority of ahi sold at local retail establishments is in the form of poke and sushi products. Consumers of poke are commonly subjected to misleading advertisements and in-store terminology, such as "prepared fresh", "freshly made", and "locally made", while the ahi used to prepare the poke is foreign-sourced, previously frozen, gas-treated, and imported in pre-cut cubes.
Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to prohibit the sale of processed ahi at Hawaii retail establishments without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
SECTION 2. Chapter 486, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to part V to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§486- Processed ahi; labeling requirements; retail establishments. (a) No retail establishment shall keep, offer, display, expose for sale, or solicit for the sale of any processed ahi without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
(b) As used in this section:
"Ahi" means yellowfin tuna or bigeye tuna, including farm-raised fish and ahi that meets the definition of "wild fish and shellfish" as defined in title 7 Code of Federal Regulations section 60.133, as amended.
"Farm-raised fish" has the same meaning as defined in title 7 Code of Federal Regulations section 60.106, as amended.
"Processed ahi" means a retail item derived from ahi that has undergone specific processing resulting in a change in the character of the ahi, or that has been combined with at least one other substantive food component (e.g., breading, tomato sauce), except that the addition of a component, such as water, salt, or sugar, that enhances or represents a further step in the preparation of the product for consumption, would not in itself result in a processed food item.
"Retail establishment" means an establishment licensed under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930, which includes any retail establishment that purchases over $230,000 of fresh or frozen produce per calendar year."
SECTION 3.
New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Report Title:
Measurement Standards; Uniform Packaging and Labeling; Food Labeling; Country of Origin; Tuna; Processed Ahi
Description:
Prohibits the sale of processed ahi in retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
534 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 |
|
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating to LABELING REQUIREMENTS.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
According to statistics from the United States Department of Commerce, the annual dockside value of commercial yellowfin and bigeye tuna (marked as ahi) landed in Hawaii's ports is around $100,000,000, making tuna the highest valued food commodity produced in the State. Even with these impressive landings, previously frozen and carbon monoxide-treated foreign imported tuna dominates sales at local retail establishments. Due to a loophole in federal country of origin labeling requirements for seafood, retail establishments are not providing consumers with information on where the ahi tuna originates. The legislature is therefore concerned that most consumers that buy ahi at local retail establishments falsely believe that previously frozen, gas-treated ahi is caught by Hawaii fisheries.
Moreover, the legislature further notes that the majority of raw ahi sold at local retail establishments is in the form of poke and sushi products. Consumers of poke are commonly subjected to misleading advertisements and in-store terminology, such as "prepared fresh", "freshly made", and "locally made", while the ahi used to prepare the poke is foreign-sourced, previously frozen, gas-treated, and imported in pre-cut cubes.
Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to extend country of origin labeling requirements for certain ahi tuna products at Hawaii retail establishments.
SECTION 2. Chapter 486, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to part V to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§486- Raw ahi; labeling requirements; retail establishments. (a) No retail establishment shall keep, offer, display, expose for sale, or solicit for the sale of any raw ahi, including any raw ahi that has been combined, mixed, marinated, or otherwise prepared for human consumption, without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
(b) As used in this section:
"Ahi" means yellowfin tuna or bigeye tuna, including farm-raised fish and ahi that meets the definition of "wild fish and shellfish" as defined in title 7 Code of Federal Regulations section 60.133, as amended.
"Farm-raised fish" has the same meaning as defined in title 7 Code of Federal Regulations section 60.106, as amended.
"Retail establishment" means an establishment licensed under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930, which includes any retail establishment that purchases over $230,000 of fresh or frozen produce per calendar year."
SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
|
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
|
Report Title:
Measurement Standards; Uniform Packaging and Labeling; Food Labeling; Country of Origin; Tuna; Raw Ahi
Description:
Prohibits the sale of raw ahi and raw ahi products in retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed.
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2025 | Act 238, on 06/27/2025 (Gov. Msg. No. 1340). |
| Jun 27, 2025 | Act 238, 06/27/2025 (Gov. Msg. No. 1340). |
| May 1, 2025 | Transmitted to Governor. |
| May 2, 2025 | Received notice of passage on Final Reading in House (Hse. Com. No. 821). |
| May 1, 2025 | Received notice of Final Reading (Sen. Com. No. 888). |
| Apr 30, 2025 | Passed Final Reading as amended in CD 1 with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Cochran, Pierick excused (2). |
| Apr 30, 2025 | Passed Final Reading, as amended (CD 1). Ayes, 25; Aye(s) with reservations: none . 0 No(es): none. 0 Excused: none. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | 48 Hrs. Notice (as amended CD 1) 04-30-25 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | Reported from Conference Committee as amended CD 1 (Conf. Com. Rep. No. 177). |
| Apr 25, 2025 | Forty-eight (48) hours notice Wednesday, 04-30-25. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | Reported from Conference Committee (Conf Com. Rep. No. 177) as amended in (CD 1). |
| Apr 25, 2025 | The Conference committee recommends that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes of the Senate Conference Managers were as follows: 3 Aye(s): Senator(s) DeCoite, Richards, Kim; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 1 Excused: Senator(s) Awa. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | The Conference Committee recommends that the measure be Passed, with Amendments. The votes were as follows: 5 Ayes: Representative(s) Kahaloa, Matayoshi, Kusch, Miyake, Pierick; Ayes with reservations: none; 0 Noes: none; and 0 Excused: none. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | Conference committee meeting to reconvene on 04-25-25 2:30 PM; Conference Room 411. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | Conference Committee Meeting will reconvene on Friday 04-25-25 9:05AM in conference room 411. |
| Apr 23, 2025 | Conference Committee Meeting will reconvene on Thursday 04-24-25 9:00AM in conference room 411. |
| Apr 22, 2025 | Received notice of change in Senate conferees (Sen. Com. No. 864). |
| Apr 22, 2025 | Senate Conferees Changed: Senator Keohokalole discharged as Co-Chair. Senator Richards added as Co-Chair. |
| Apr 22, 2025 | Bill scheduled for Conference Committee Meeting on Wednesday, 04-23-25 9:00AM in conference room 411. |
| Apr 21, 2025 | Received notice of Senate conferees (Sen. Com. No. 847). |
| Apr 21, 2025 | Senate Conferees Appointed: DeCoite Chair; Keohokalole Co-Chair; Kim, Awa. |
| Apr 21, 2025 | Received notice of appointment of House conferees (Hse. Com. No. 755). |
| Apr 17, 2025 | House Conferees Appointed: Kahaloa, Matayoshi, Kusch Co-Chairs; Miyake, Pierick. |
| Apr 11, 2025 | Received notice of disagreement (Hse. Com. No. 704). |
| Apr 10, 2025 | House disagrees with Senate amendment (s). |
| Apr 8, 2025 | Returned from Senate (Sen. Com. No. 653) in amended form (SD 1). |
| Apr 8, 2025 | Report adopted; Passed Third Reading. Ayes, 25; Aye(s) with reservations: none . Noes, 0 (none). Excused, 0 (none). Transmitted to House. |
| Apr 4, 2025 | One Day Notice 04-08-25. |
| Apr 4, 2025 | Reported from CPN (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1724) with recommendation of passage on Third Reading. |
| Mar 27, 2025 | The committee(s) on CPN recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, UNAMENDED. The votes in CPN were as follows: 3 Aye(s): Senator(s) Keohokalole, Fukunaga, Awa; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 2 Excused: Senator(s) McKelvey, Richards. |
| Mar 21, 2025 | The committee(s) on CPN will hold a public decision making on 03-27-25 9:30AM; Conference Room 229 & Videoconference. |
| Mar 19, 2025 | Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referred to CPN. |
| Mar 19, 2025 | Reported from EDT (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1173) with recommendation of passage on Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referral to CPN. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | The committee(s) on EDT recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in EDT were as follows: 5 Aye(s): Senator(s) DeCoite, Wakai, Fukunaga, Kim, Awa; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 0 Excused: none. |
| Mar 10, 2025 | The committee(s) on EDT has scheduled a public hearing on 03-13-25 1:01PM; Conference Room 229 & Videoconference. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | Referred to EDT, CPN. |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Passed First Reading. |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 23). |
| Feb 27, 2025 | Passed Third Reading with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Cochran, Pierick, Templo, Ward excused (4). Transmitted to Senate. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | Reported from FIN (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 870), recommending passage on Third Reading. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | The committee on FIN recommend that the measure be PASSED, UNAMENDED. The votes were as follows: 14 Ayes: Representative(s) Yamashita, Takenouchi, Grandinetti, Holt, Hussey, Keohokapu-Lee Loy, Kitagawa, Kusch, Lamosao, Lee, M., Miyake, Morikawa, Templo, Reyes Oda; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 2 Excused: Representative(s) Alcos, Ward. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | Bill scheduled to be heard by FIN on Thursday, 02-20-25 2:00PM in House conference room 308 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | Report adopted; referred to the committee(s) on FIN as amended in HD 2 with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Cochran, Matayoshi, Poepoe, Ward excused (4). |
| Feb 14, 2025 | Reported from CPC (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 785) as amended in HD 2, recommending referral to FIN. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | The committee on CPC recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 10 Ayes: Representative(s) Matayoshi, Chun, Ilagan, Ichiyama, Iwamoto, Kong, Lowen, Marten, Tam, Pierick; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and Excused: none. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | Bill scheduled to be heard by CPC on Thursday, 02-06-25 2:00PM in House conference room 329 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on CPC with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Cochran, Kong, Ward excused (3). |
| Feb 4, 2025 | Reported from AGR (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 80) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to CPC. |
| Jan 31, 2025 | The committee on AGR recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 5 Ayes: Representative(s) Kahaloa, Kusch, Lowen, Perruso, Quinlan; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Ward. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Bill scheduled to be heard by AGR on Friday, 01-31-25 10:00AM in House conference room 325 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE. |
| Jan 27, 2025 | Re-referred to AGR, CPC, FIN, referral sheet 4 |
| Jan 21, 2025 | Referred to WAL, CPC, FIN, referral sheet 2 |
| Jan 21, 2025 | Introduced and Pass First Reading. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | Pending introduction. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2025 | Final Reading | House Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 30, 2025 | Final Reading | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 8, 2025 | Third Reading | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Mar 27, 2025 | The committee(s) on CPN recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, UNAMENDED | Senate Standing Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection |
Passed |
|
| Mar 13, 2025 | The committee(s) on EDT recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | Senate Standing Committee on Economic Development and Tourism |
Passed |
|
| Feb 27, 2025 | Third Reading | House Floor |
Passed |
|
| Feb 20, 2025 | The committee on FIN recommend that the measure be PASSED, UNAMENDED | House Standing Committee on Finance |
Passed |
|
| Feb 6, 2025 | The committee on CPC recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | House Standing Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce |
Passed |
|
| Jan 31, 2025 | The committee on AGR recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | House Standing Committee on Agriculture & Food Systems |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Board of Land and Natural Resources | *** Support | Feb 20, 2025 |
| Chamber of Commerce Hawaii | ** Support | |
| Department of Land and Natural Resources | ** Support | |
| Farm Link Hawaii | ** Support | |
| Farm Link Hawaiʻi | *** Support | Jan 30, 2025 |
| Fishing Tales with Mike Sakamoto | *** Support | Mar 13, 2025 |
| Fishing Tales with Mike Sakamoto | ** Support | |
| Hawai'i Farm Bureau | *** Support | Mar 27, 2025 |
| Hawaii Longline Association | ** Support | |
| Hawaii Seafood Council | ** Support | |
| Hawaii Fishermen's Alliance for Conservation and Tradition, Inc. | ** Support | |
| Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau | ** Support | |
| Hawaiʻi Farmers Union United | ** Support | |
| Hawai’i Fishermen’s Alliance for Conservation and Tradition, Inc. | *** Support | Jan 30, 2025 |
| Local I'a | *** Support | Jan 30, 2025 |
| Local Ia | ** Support | |
| North Shore Nutrition | ** Support | |
| Paradise Poke Hawaii | ** Support |
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REP. NO. 177
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2025
RE: H.B. No. 534
H.D. 2
S.D. 1
C.D. 1
Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura
Speaker, House of Representatives
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2025
State of Hawaii
Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi
President of the Senate
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2025
State of Hawaii
Madam and Sir:
Your Committee on Conference on the disagreeing vote of the House of Representatives to the amendments proposed by the Senate in H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2, S.D. 1, entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO LABELING REQUIREMENTS,"
having met, and after full and free discussion, has agreed to recommend and does recommend to the respective Houses the final passage of this bill in an amended form.
The purpose of this measure is to prohibit the sale of processed food items with raw ahi products as an ingredient at Hawaii retail establishments without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
Your Committee on Conference has amended this measure by:
(1) Prohibiting the sale of raw processed ahi, rather than processed food items with raw ahi products as an ingredient, without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed, and codifying the provisions under chapter 486, Hawaii Revised Statutes, rather than chapter 481B, Hawaii Revised Statutes;
(2) Inserting a definition for "raw processed ahi";
(3) Changing the effective date to July 1, 2026; and
(4) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the managers of your Committee on Conference that is attached to this report, your Committee on Conference is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2, S.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Final Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2, S.D. 1, C.D. 1.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the managers:
|
ON THE PART OF THE SENATE |
|
ON THE PART OF THE HOUSE |
|
____________________________ LYNN DECOITE Chair |
|
____________________________ KIRSTIN KAHALOA Co-Chair |
|
____________________________ HERBERT M. RICHARDS, III Co-Chair |
|
____________________________ SCOT Z. MATAYOSHI Co-Chair |
|
|
|
____________________________ MATTHIAS KUSCH Co-Chair |
|
|
|
|
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 1724
Honolulu, Hawaii
RE: H.B. No. 534
H.D. 2
S.D. 1
Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi
President of the Senate
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2025
State of Hawaii
Sir:
Your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection, to which was referred H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2, S.D. 1, entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO LABELING REQUIREMENTS,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose and intent of this measure is to prohibit the sale of processed food items with raw ahi products as an ingredient at Hawaii retail establishments without a label stating the country in which the ahi was landed.
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Land and Natural Resources, Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau, Hawaii Longline Association, Hawaii Seafood Council, and five individuals.
Your Committee finds that Hawaii is known for its high‑quality ahi tuna fish, which are caught under strict fishery management standards. Many consumers prefer to buy locally sourced food to support the local economy, and stringent Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) requirements under existing federal laws are intended to provide consumers with the information necessary to make informed choices about the foods they eat. These COOL regulations, however, do not apply to prepared foods offered for retail sale at food service establishments, where certain "locally made" labels may be misleading to consumers if the product is prepared with non-Hawaiian caught fish. This measure ensures consumer transparency while protecting the local fishing industry by requiring COOL requirements for processed ahi products sold at retail establishments in the State.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2, S.D. 1, and recommends that it pass Third Reading.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection,
|
|
|
________________________________ JARRETT KEOHOKALOLE, Chair |
|
|
|
|
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 1173
Honolulu, Hawaii
RE: H.B. No. 534
H.D. 2
S.D. 1
Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi
President of the Senate
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2025
State of Hawaii
Sir:
Your Committee on Economic Development and Tourism, to which was referred H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2, entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO LABELING REQUIREMENTS,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose and intent of this measure is to prohibit the sale of any processed food item with raw ahi product as an ingredient by retail establishments without a label that states the country where the ahi was landed.
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Land and Natural Resources, Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau, Fishing Tales with Mike Sakamoto, Hawaiʻi Farmers Union United, and four individuals.
Your Committee finds that local tuna fisheries and associated seafood markets are an important sector of the State's economy and food production. While the State is known for high-quality ahi, which is regulated by strict fishery management standards, imported tuna comprises an overwhelming percentage of sales at local retail establishments. Your Committee further finds that federal regulations that require seafood products to be labeled with the country of origin do not apply to prepared foods such as poke offered for retail sale at food service establishments. Due to the differences in labeling requirements, imported products are sometimes deceptively marketed as "Hawaiian" or "local". By establishing labeling requirements for any processed food item containing raw ahi product, this measure will provide greater transparency to consumers, promoting informed purchasing decisions.
Your Committee has amended this measure by:
(1) Inserting an effective date of July 1, 2050, to encourage further discussion; and
(2) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity and consistency.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Economic Development and Tourism that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2, S.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Economic Development and Tourism,
|
|
|
________________________________ LYNN DECOITE, Chair |
|
|
|
|
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 870
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2025
RE: H.B. No. 534
H.D. 2
Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura
Speaker, House of Representatives
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2025
State of Hawaii
Madame:
Your Committee on Finance, to which was referred H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2, entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO LABELING REQUIREMENTS,"
begs leave to report as follows:
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Land and Natural Resources; Chamber of Commerce Hawaii; Hawaii Farm Bureau; Fishing Tales with Mike Sakamoto; Hawaii Longline Association; and four individuals. Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Department of Agriculture.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Finance that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2, and recommends that it pass Third Reading.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Finance,
|
|
|
____________________________ KYLE T. YAMASHITA, Chair |
|
|
|
|
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 785
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2025
RE: H.B. No. 534
H.D. 2
Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura
Speaker, House of Representatives
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2025
State of Hawaii
Madame:
Your Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce, to which was referred H.B. No. 534, H.D. 1, entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO LABELING REQUIREMENTS,"
begs leave to report as follows:
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Land and Natural Resources; Hawaii Longline Association; Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau; Fishing Tales with Mike Sakamoto; Hawaiʻi Farmers Union; Chamber of Commerce Hawaii; and ten individuals. Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Department of Agriculture and three individuals.
Your Committee finds that the State is known for its high-quality ahi, which are caught under strict fishery management standards. However, ahi poke sold at retail establishments is dominated by previously frozen, carbon monoxide treated fish that is imported from foreign sources. This causes confusion to the consumer, who, as a result of deceptive advertising tactics such as "freshly made," and "locally prepared," are mislead into believing the product is fresh or locally caught. This measure provides a mechanism by which consumers may be assured of the ahi's origin.
Your Committee has amended this measure by:
(1) Moving the provisions of this measure under the enforcement purview of the Department of the Attorney General and the Office of Consumer Protection;
(2) Specifying that the labeling requirements apply to any raw ahi product that is an ingredient in a processed food item, not to processed ahi;
(3) Clarifying that the retail establishments subject to this labeling requirement are establishments that:
(A) Are licensed under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930; and
(B) Purchase over $230,000 of fresh or frozen produce per calendar year; and
(4) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 534, H.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends that it be referred to your Committee on Finance in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 534, H.D. 2.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce,
|
|
|
____________________________ SCOT Z. MATAYOSHI, Chair |
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 80
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2025
RE: H.B. No. 534
H.D. 1
Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura
Speaker, House of Representatives
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2025
State of Hawaii
Madame:
Your Committee on Agriculture & Food Systems, to which was referred H.B. No. 534 entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO LABELING REQUIREMENTS,"
begs leave to report as follows:
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Land and Natural Resources; North Shore Nutrition; Hawaii Fishermen's Alliance for Conservation and Tradition, Inc.; Hawaii Longline Association; Farm Link Hawaii; Paradise Poke Hawaii; Local Ia; and numerous individuals. Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Department of the Attorney General and Department of Agriculture.
Your Committee finds that Hawaii's tuna fisheries are a vital part of the State's economy and food system, yet consumers are often misled about the origin of the ahi they purchase, as most ahi sold at retail establishments, particularly in poke and sushi products, is actually imported, previously frozen, and carbon monoxide-treated. Due to a loophole in federal labeling laws, retailers are not required to disclose the origin of these products, leading many consumers to falsely assume they are purchasing fresh, locally caught tuna. By ensuring transparency in seafood labeling, this measure empowers consumers to make informed choices, supports Hawaii's fishing industry, and protects the integrity of the State's premium seafood market.
Your Committee notes that further consideration should be given to other ways to strengthen the intent of this measure by looking at other metrics for labeling requirements of processed ahi, such as "fresh" or "previously frozen".
Your Committee has amended this measure by:
(1) Clarifying that the labeling requirements apply to processed ahi, rather than raw ahi;
(2) Adding a definition for "processed ahi";
(3) Changing the effective date to July 1, 3000, to encourage further discussion; and
(4) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Agriculture & Food Systems that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 534, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 534, H.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Agriculture & Food Systems,
|
|
|
____________________________ KIRSTIN KAHALOA, Chair |
|
Date
|
Testimony PDF
|
|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2025 | HB534_SD1_TESTIMONY_CPN_03-27-25_.PDF |
| Mar 13, 2025 | HB534_HD2_TESTIMONY_EDT_03-13-25_.PDF |
| Feb 20, 2025 | HB534_HD2_TESTIMONY_FIN_02-20-25_.PDF |
| Feb 6, 2025 | HB534_HD1_TESTIMONY_CPC_02-06-25_.PDF |
| Jan 30, 2025 | HB534_TESTIMONY_AGR_01-31-25_.PDF |
Discussed in Hearing
Conference Committee
Conference Committee
Conference Committee
Conference Committee
Conference Committee
Senate Standing Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection
Senate Standing Committee on Transportation and Culture and the Arts
Senate Standing Committee on Economic Development and Tourism
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):