HB 2324: Department of Labor and Industrial Relations; Occupational Safety and Health Administration; Complaints; Determinations; Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: House
- Latest Version Date: 2026-03-25
Current Status:
Failed
(2026-04-07: The committee on JDC deferred the measure.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Final Decking
Enacted
Repeals the requirement that the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations regulate hoisting machines and certify their operators and the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board, including its rules requiring a separate state crane operator certificate. Allows additional time for the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations to complete an investigation of a discharge or discrimination complaint pertaining to employees exercising rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Law without formal extension. (SD1)
Repeals the requirement that the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations regulate hoisting machines and certify their operators and the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board, including its rules requiring a separate state crane operator certificate. Allows additional time for the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations to complete an investigation of a discharge or discrimination complaint pertaining to employees exercising rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Law without formal extension. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD2)
Repeals the requirement that the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations regulate hoisting machines and certify their operators and the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board, including its rules requiring a separate state crane operator certificate. Allows additional time for the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations to complete an investigation of a discharge or discrimination complaint pertaining to employees exercising rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Law without formal extension. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Repeals the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board and its rules requiring a separate state crane operator certificate and allows additional time for the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations to complete an investigation of a discharge or discrimination complaint pertaining to employees exercising rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Law without formal extension.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2324 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
H.D. 2 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
S.D. 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO THE HAWAII OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH LAW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 396-3, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by repealing the definitions of "hoisting machine" and "hoisting machine operator".
[""Hoisting
machine" means a machine with a hoist line, sling, or hydraulic lifting
mechanism used in construction, demolition, or excavation work.
"Hoisting
machine operator" means any individual who operates a hoisting machine in
the State."]
SECTION 2. Section 396-4, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
"(a) Administration. The department shall be responsible for administering occupational safety and health standards throughout the State.
(1) The department shall prescribe and enforce rules under chapter 91 as may be necessary for carrying out the purposes and provisions of this chapter. The department shall make reports to the United States Secretary of Labor in the form and containing the information that the Secretary from time to time shall require pursuant to federal law;
(2) The department shall adopt, amend, or repeal occupational safety and health standards in the manner prescribed by rules adopted hereunder. Emergency temporary standards may be adopted without conforming to chapter 91 and without hearings to take immediate effect upon giving a statewide public notice of the emergency temporary standard or upon any other date that may be specified in the notice. An emergency temporary standard may be adopted if the director determines:
(A) That employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from new hazards; and
(B) That the emergency temporary standard is necessary to protect employees from danger.
The emergency temporary standard shall be effective until superseded by a standard adopted in accordance with the procedures set forth in chapter 91, but in any case shall be effective no longer than six months;
(3) Variances from occupational safety and
health standards adopted under this chapter may be granted upon application of
an employer or employers. Application
for variances [must] shall correspond to procedures set forth in
the rules of this chapter. The director
may issue an order for variance if the director determines that the proponent
of the variance has demonstrated that the conditions, practices, means,
methods, operations, or processes used or proposed to be used by the employer
will provide employment and places of employment to the employer's employees [which]
that are as safe and healthful as those [which] that would
prevail if the employer complied with the standard. The employer shall also notify the employer's
employees upon each application for variance and the employees shall be given
an opportunity to request and participate in hearings or other proceedings
relating to applications for variance.
No inference of admission of violation of a standard shall be made
against the employer by reason of the employer's application for variance; and
(4) The department, upon the application of
any employer or other person affected thereby, may grant any time that may
reasonably be necessary for compliance with any order. Any person affected by an order may petition the
department for an extension of time, which may be granted if the department
finds it necessary[; and
(5) The department shall regulate
hoisting machines and shall certify their operators]."
SECTION 3. Section 396-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:
"(e) Discharge or discrimination against employees for exercising any right under this chapter is prohibited. In consideration of this prohibition:
(1) No person shall discharge, suspend or otherwise discriminate in terms and conditions of employment against any employee by reason of:
(A) The employee's failure or refusal to
operate or handle any machine, device, apparatus, or equipment [which] that
is in any unsafe condition; or
(B) The employee's failure or refusal to engage in unsafe practices in violation of this chapter or of any standard, rule, regulation, citation, or order issued under the authority of this chapter;
(2) Upon discretion of the director or request, names of complainants may be withheld from the employer;
(3) No person shall discharge or in any
manner discriminate against any employee because the employee has filed any
complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or
related to this chapter, or has testified or intends to testify in any [such]
proceeding, or is acting to exercise or has exercised on behalf
of the employee or others any right afforded by this chapter;
(4) Any employee who believes that there has been a discharge or discrimination against the employee by any person in violation of this subsection may, within sixty days after the violation occurs, file a complaint with the director alleging unlawful discharge or discrimination and setting forth the circumstances thereof;
(5) Upon receipt of the complaint, the director shall investigate to determine if a discharge or discrimination in violation of this subsection has occurred;
(6) If upon investigation the director determines that the provisions of this subsection have been violated, the director shall order the employer to provide all appropriate relief to the employee, including rehiring or reinstating the employee to the former position with back pay and restoration of seniority;
(7) Within ninety days of receipt of a
complaint filed under this subsection, [unless extended by the director,]
the director shall notify the employee of the final determination and any
subsequent action the department will take to resolve the complaint[;],
unless the investigation cannot be completed within that period, in which case
up to ninety additional days shall be allowed without notice. Any further extension may be granted by the
director with notice to the employee of the additional time required and the
expected date of the final determination; and
(8) Nothing in this subsection shall preclude any employee or representative of an employee from simultaneously pursuing a cause of action for injunctive relief or any other remedy provided by law."
SECTION 4. Section 396-19, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is repealed.
["§396-19 Hoisting machine operators advisory board. (a)
There is created a hoisting machine operators advisory board, which
shall be placed in the department for administrative purposes, to be composed
of five members to serve without compensation and without reimbursement for
expenses. Members shall be appointed by
the governor under section 26-34.
The
board shall adopt rules pursuant to chapter 91 for the certification of
hoisting machine operators.
(b) The hoisting machine operators
advisory board may employ a 0.5 full-time equivalent office assistant, without
regard to chapters 76 and 89 and may dismiss such person as it finds necessary
for the performance of its function and duties.
The board shall have the authority to fix the office assistant's
compensation."]
SECTION 5. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 6. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Report Title:
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations; Occupational Safety and Health Administration; Complaints; Determinations; Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board
Description:
Repeals the requirement that the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations regulate hoisting machines and certify their operators and the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board, including its rules requiring a separate state crane operator certificate. Allows additional time for the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations to complete an investigation of a discharge or discrimination complaint pertaining to employees exercising rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Law without formal extension. (SD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2324 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
H.D. 2 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO THE HAWAII OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH LAW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 396-3, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by repealing the definitions of "hoisting machine" and "hoisting machine operator".
[""Hoisting
machine" means a machine with a hoist line, sling, or hydraulic lifting
mechanism used in construction, demolition, or excavation work.
"Hoisting
machine operator" means any individual who operates a hoisting machine in
the State."]
SECTION 2. Section 396-4, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
"(a) Administration. The department shall be responsible for administering occupational safety and health standards throughout the State.
(1) The department shall prescribe and enforce rules under chapter 91 as may be necessary for carrying out the purposes and provisions of this chapter. The department shall make reports to the United States Secretary of Labor in the form and containing the information that the Secretary from time to time shall require pursuant to federal law;
(2) The department shall adopt, amend, or repeal occupational safety and health standards in the manner prescribed by rules adopted hereunder. Emergency temporary standards may be adopted without conforming to chapter 91 and without hearings to take immediate effect upon giving a statewide public notice of the emergency temporary standard or upon any other date that may be specified in the notice. An emergency temporary standard may be adopted if the director determines:
(A) That employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from new hazards; and
(B) That the emergency temporary standard is necessary to protect employees from danger.
The emergency temporary standard shall be effective until superseded by a standard adopted in accordance with the procedures set forth in chapter 91, but in any case shall be effective no longer than six months;
(3) Variances from occupational safety and
health standards adopted under this chapter may be granted upon application of
an employer or employers. Application
for variances [must] shall correspond to procedures set forth in
the rules of this chapter. The director
may issue an order for variance if the director determines that the proponent
of the variance has demonstrated that the conditions, practices, means,
methods, operations, or processes used or proposed to be used by the employer
will provide employment and places of employment to the employer's employees [which]
that are as safe and healthful as those [which] that would
prevail if the employer complied with the standard. The employer shall also notify the employer's
employees upon each application for variance and the employees shall be given
an opportunity to request and participate in hearings or other proceedings
relating to applications for variance.
No inference of admission of violation of a standard shall be made
against the employer by reason of the employer's application for variance; and
(4) The department, upon the application of
any employer or other person affected thereby, may grant any time that may
reasonably be necessary for compliance with any order. Any person affected by an order may petition the
department for an extension of time, which may be granted if the department
finds it necessary[; and
(5) The department shall regulate
hoisting machines and shall certify their operators]."
SECTION 3. Section 396-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:
"(e) Discharge or discrimination against employees for exercising any right under this chapter is prohibited. In consideration of this prohibition:
(1) No person shall discharge, suspend or otherwise discriminate in terms and conditions of employment against any employee by reason of:
(A) The employee's failure or refusal to
operate or handle any machine, device, apparatus, or equipment [which] that
is in any unsafe condition; or
(B) The employee's failure or refusal to engage in unsafe practices in violation of this chapter or of any standard, rule, regulation, citation, or order issued under the authority of this chapter;
(2) Upon discretion of the director or request, names of complainants may be withheld from the employer;
(3) No person shall discharge or in any
manner discriminate against any employee because the employee has filed any
complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or
related to this chapter, or has testified or intends to testify in any [such]
proceeding, or is acting to exercise or has exercised on behalf
of the employee or others any right afforded by this chapter;
(4) Any employee who believes that there has been a discharge or discrimination against the employee by any person in violation of this subsection may, within sixty days after the violation occurs, file a complaint with the director alleging unlawful discharge or discrimination and setting forth the circumstances thereof;
(5) Upon receipt of the complaint, the director shall investigate to determine if a discharge or discrimination in violation of this subsection has occurred;
(6) If upon investigation the director determines that the provisions of this subsection have been violated, the director shall order the employer to provide all appropriate relief to the employee, including rehiring or reinstating the employee to the former position with back pay and restoration of seniority;
(7) Within ninety days of receipt of a
complaint filed under this subsection, [unless extended by the director,]
the director shall notify the employee of the final determination and any
subsequent action the department will take to resolve the complaint[;],
unless the investigation cannot be completed within that period, in which case
up to ninety additional days shall be allowed without notice. Any further extension may be granted by the
director with notice to the employee of the additional time required and the
expected date of the final determination; and
(8) Nothing in this subsection shall preclude any employee or representative of an employee from simultaneously pursuing a cause of action for injunctive relief or any other remedy provided by law."
SECTION 4. Section 396-19, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is repealed.
["§396-19 Hoisting machine operators advisory board. (a)
There is created a hoisting machine operators advisory board, which
shall be placed in the department for administrative purposes, to be composed
of five members to serve without compensation and without reimbursement for
expenses. Members shall be appointed by
the governor under section 26-34.
The
board shall adopt rules pursuant to chapter 91 for the certification of
hoisting machine operators.
(b) The hoisting machine operators
advisory board may employ a 0.5 full-time equivalent office assistant, without
regard to chapters 76 and 89 and may dismiss such person as it finds necessary
for the performance of its function and duties.
The board shall have the authority to fix the office assistant's
compensation."]
SECTION 5. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 6. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Report Title:
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations; Occupational Safety and Health Administration; Complaints; Determinations; Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board
Description:
Repeals the requirement that the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations regulate hoisting machines and certify their operators and the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board, including its rules requiring a separate state crane operator certificate. Allows additional time for the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations to complete an investigation of a discharge or discrimination complaint pertaining to employees exercising rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Law without formal extension. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD2)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2324 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
H.D. 1 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO THE HAWAII OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH LAW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 396-3, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by repealing the definitions of "hoisting machine" and "hoisting machine operator".
[""Hoisting
machine" means a machine with a hoist line, sling, or hydraulic lifting
mechanism used in construction, demolition, or excavation work.
"Hoisting
machine operator" means any individual who operates a hoisting machine in
the State."]
SECTION 2. Section 396-4, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
"(a) Administration. The department shall be responsible for administering occupational safety and health standards throughout the State.
(1) The department shall prescribe and enforce rules under chapter 91 as may be necessary for carrying out the purposes and provisions of this chapter. The department shall make reports to the Secretary of Labor in the form and containing the information that the Secretary from time to time shall require pursuant to federal law;
(2) The department shall adopt, amend, or repeal occupational safety and health standards in the manner prescribed by rules adopted hereunder. Emergency temporary standards may be adopted without conforming to chapter 91 and without hearings to take immediate effect upon giving a statewide public notice of the emergency temporary standard or upon any other date that may be specified in the notice. An emergency temporary standard may be adopted if the director determines:
(A) That employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from new hazards; and
(B) That the emergency standard is necessary to protect employees from danger.
The emergency temporary standard shall be effective until superseded by a standard adopted in accordance with the procedures set forth in chapter 91, but in any case shall be effective no longer than six months;
(3) Variances from occupational safety and
health standards adopted under this chapter may be granted upon application of
an employer or employers. Application
for variances [must] shall correspond to procedures set forth in
the rules of this chapter. The director
may issue an order for variance if the director determines that the proponent
of the variance has demonstrated that the conditions, practices, means,
methods, operations, or processes used or proposed to be used by the employer
will provide employment and places of employment to the employer's employees [which]
that are as safe and healthful as those [which] that would
prevail if the employer complied with the standard. The employer shall also notify the employer's
employees upon each application for variance and the employees shall be given
an opportunity to request and participate in hearings or other proceedings
relating to applications for variance.
No inference of admission of violation of a standard shall be made
against the employer by reason of the employer's application for variance; and
(4) The department, upon the application of
any employer or other person affected thereby, may grant any time that may
reasonably be necessary for compliance with any order. Any person affected by an order may petition the
department for an extension of time, which may be granted if the department
finds it necessary[; and
(5) The department shall regulate
hoisting machines and shall certify their operators]."
SECTION 3. Section 396-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:
"(e) Discharge or discrimination against employees for exercising any right under this chapter is prohibited. In consideration of this prohibition:
(1) No person shall discharge, suspend or otherwise discriminate in terms and conditions of employment against any employee by reason of:
(A) The employee's failure or refusal to operate or handle any machine, device, apparatus, or equipment which is in any unsafe condition; or
(B) The employee's failure or refusal to engage in unsafe practices in violation of this chapter or of any standard, rule, regulation, citation or order issued under the authority of this chapter;
(2) Upon discretion of the director or request, names of complainants may be withheld from the employer;
(3) No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because the employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this chapter, or has testified or intends to testify in any such proceeding, or acting to exercise or exercised on behalf of the employee or others any right afforded by this chapter;
(4) Any employee who believes that there has been a discharge or discrimination against the employee by any person in violation of this subsection may, within sixty days after the violation occurs, file a complaint with the director alleging unlawful discharge or discrimination and setting forth the circumstances thereof;
(5) Upon receipt of the complaint, the director shall investigate to determine if a discharge or discrimination in violation of this subsection has occurred;
(6) If upon investigation the director determines that the provisions of this subsection have been violated, the director shall order the employer to provide all appropriate relief to the employee, including rehiring or reinstating the employee to the former position with back pay and restoration of seniority;
(7) Within ninety days of receipt of a
complaint filed under this subsection, [unless extended by the director,]
the director shall notify the employee of the final determination and any
subsequent action the department will take to resolve the complaint[;],
unless the investigation cannot be completed within that period, in which case
up to ninety additional days shall be allowed without notice. Any further extension may be granted by the
director with notice to the employee of the additional time required and the
expected date of the final determination; and
(8) Nothing in this subsection shall preclude any employee or representative of an employee from simultaneously pursuing a cause of action for injunctive relief or any other remedy provided by law."
SECTION 4. Section 396-19, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is repealed.
["§396-19 Hoisting machine operators advisory board. (a)
There is created a hoisting machine operators advisory board, which
shall be placed in the department for administrative purposes, to be composed
of five members to serve without compensation and without reimbursement for
expenses. Members shall be appointed by
the governor under section 26-34.
The
board shall adopt rules pursuant to chapter 91 for the certification of
hoisting machine operators.
(b) The hoisting machine operators
advisory board may employ a 0.5 full-time equivalent office assistant, without
regard to chapters 76 and 89 and may dismiss such person as it finds necessary
for the performance of its function and duties.
The board shall have the authority to fix the office assistant's
compensation."]
SECTION 5. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 6. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Report Title:
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations; Occupational Safety and Health Administration; Complaints; Determinations; Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board
Description:
Repeals the requirement that the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations regulate hoisting machines and certify their operators and the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board, including its rules requiring a separate state crane operator certificate. Allows additional time for the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations to complete an investigation of a discharge or discrimination complaint pertaining to employees exercising rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Law without formal extension. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2324 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
|
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
rELATING TO THE HAWAII OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH LAW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 396-3, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by repealing the definitions of "hoisting machine" and "hoisting machine operator".
[""Hoisting machine"
means a machine with a hoist line, sling, or hydraulic lifting mechanism used
in construction, demolition, or excavation work.
"Hoisting machine operator"
means any individual who operates a hoisting machine in the State."]
SECTION 2. Section 396-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:
"(e) Discharge or discrimination against employees for exercising any right under this chapter is prohibited. In consideration of this prohibition:
(1) No person shall discharge, suspend or otherwise discriminate in terms and conditions of employment against any employee by reason of:
(A) The employee's failure or refusal to operate or handle any machine, device, apparatus, or equipment which is in any unsafe condition; or
(B) The employee's failure or refusal to engage in unsafe practices in violation of this chapter or of any standard, rule, regulation, citation or order issued under the authority of this chapter;
(2) Upon discretion of the director or request, names of complainants may be withheld from the employer;
(3) No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because the employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this chapter, or has testified or intends to testify in any such proceeding, or acting to exercise or exercised on behalf of the employee or others any right afforded by this chapter;
(4) Any employee who believes that there has been a discharge or discrimination against the employee by any person in violation of this subsection may, within sixty days after the violation occurs, file a complaint with the director alleging unlawful discharge or discrimination and setting forth the circumstances thereof;
(5) Upon receipt of the complaint, the director shall investigate to determine if a discharge or discrimination in violation of this subsection has occurred;
(6) If upon investigation the director determines that the provisions of this subsection have been violated, the director shall order the employer to provide all appropriate relief to the employee, including rehiring or reinstating the employee to the former position with back pay and restoration of seniority;
(7) Within
ninety days of receipt of a complaint filed under this subsection, [unless
extended by the director,] the director shall notify the employee of the
final determination and any subsequent action the department will take to
resolve the complaint[;] unless the investigation cannot be completed
within that period, in which case up to ninety additional days are allowed
without notice. Any further extension
may be granted by the director with notice to the employee of the additional
time required and the expected date of the final detemination; and
(8) Nothing in this subsection shall preclude any employee or representative of an employee from simultaneously pursuing a cause of action for injunctive relief or any other remedy provided by law."
SECTION 3. Section 396-19, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is repealed.
["§396-19 Hoisting machine operators advisory board. (a)
There is created a hoisting machine operators advisory board, which
shall be placed in the department for administrative purposes, to be composed
of five members to serve without compensation and without reimbursement for
expenses. Members shall be appointed by
the governor under section 26-34.
The board shall adopt rules pursuant to
chapter 91 for the certification of hoisting machine operators.
(b) The
hoisting machine operators advisory board may employ a 0.5 full-time equivalent
office assistant, without regard to chapters 76 and 89 and may dismiss such
person as it finds necessary for the performance of its function and duties. The board shall have the authority to fix the
office assistant's compensation."]
SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
|
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
BY REQUEST |
Report Title:
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations; Occupational Safety and Health Administration; Complaints; Determinations; Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board
Description:
Repeals the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board and its rules requiring a separate state crane operator certificate and allows additional time for the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations to complete an investigation of a discharge or discrimination complaint pertaining to employees exercising rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Law without formal extension.
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2026 | The committee on JDC deferred the measure. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | The committee(s) on JDC will hold a public decision making on 04-07-26 10:15AM; Conference Room 016 & Videoconference. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referred to JDC. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | Reported from LBT (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 3212) with recommendation of passage on Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referral to JDC. |
| Mar 18, 2026 | The committee(s) on LBT recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in LBT were as follows: 5 Aye(s): Senator(s) Elefante, Lamosao, Ihara, Moriwaki, Fevella; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 0 Excused: none. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | The committee(s) on LBT has scheduled a public hearing on 03-18-26 3:00PM; Conference Room 225 & Videoconference. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Referred to LBT, JDC. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Passed First Reading. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 399). |
| Mar 10, 2026 | Passed Third Reading as amended in HD 2 with none voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Amato voting no (1) and none excused (0). Transmitted to Senate. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | Forty-eight (48) hours notice Tuesday, 03-10-26. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | Reported from CPC (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1047-26) as amended in HD 2, recommending passage on Third Reading. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | The committee on CPC recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 10 Ayes: Representative(s) Matayoshi, Grandinetti, Chun, Ilagan, Ichiyama, Iwamoto, Kong, Lowen, Marten, Tam; Ayes with reservations: none; 0 Noes: none; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Pierick. |
| Feb 27, 2026 | Bill scheduled to be heard by CPC on Tuesday, 03-03-26 2:00PM in House conference room 329 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on CPC with Representative(s) Amato voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Cochran, Lee, M., Poepoe excused (3). |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Reported from LAB (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 272-26) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to CPC. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | The committee on LAB recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 6 Ayes: Representative(s) Sayama, Lee, M., Garrett, Kapela, Kong, Reyes Oda; Ayes with reservations: none; 0 Noes: none; and 0 Excused: none. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Bill scheduled to be heard by LAB on Tuesday, 02-10-26 9:30AM in House conference room 309 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | Referred to LAB, CPC, referral sheet 6 |
| Jan 28, 2026 | Introduced and Pass First Reading. |
| Jan 26, 2026 | Pending introduction. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026 | The committee(s) on LBT recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | Senate Standing Committee on Labor and Technology |
Passed |
|
| Mar 10, 2026 | Third Reading | House Floor |
Passed |
|
| Mar 3, 2026 | The committee on CPC recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | House Standing Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce |
Passed |
|
| Feb 10, 2026 | The committee on LAB recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | House Standing Committee on Labor |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DLIR) | *** Support | Apr 6, 2026 |
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 1047-26
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2026
RE: H.B. No. 2324
H.D. 2
Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura
Speaker, House of Representatives
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2026
State of Hawaii
Madame:
Your Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce, to which was referred H.B. No. 2324, H.D. 1, entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO THE HAWAII OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH LAW,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose of this measure is to update the Hawaii Occupational Safety and Health Law by:
(1) Repealing the authority for the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations to regulate hoisting machines and certify their operators;
(2) Allowing the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations to complete an investigation of a discharge or discrimination complaint without formal extension; and
(3) Repealing the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board.
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations.
Your Committee finds that the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board was established in 1998, prior to the adoption of federal crane operator certification standards. Following the federal Occupation Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) issuance of the Cranes and Derricks in Construction standard in 2010, and due to repeated delays at the federal level regarding enforcement, the State adopted separate state certification requirements for hoisting machine operators. As a result, operators are required to obtain a state certificate in addition to OSHA-compliant certification, even though the state certificate is issued only after federal certification and is not required by OSHA. Your Committee further finds that this duplicative requirement imposes additional administrative burdens without enhancing safety, and that repealing the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board would streamline regulation while preserving federal certification standards.
Your Committee also finds that investigations of whistleblower complaints can involve complex factual, legal, and procedural issues that cannot always be resolved within the existing ninety‑day timeframe. Under existing law, rigid investigation deadlines may limit the Department's ability to fully develop the record, particularly in cases involving multiple parties, extensive documentation, or technical analysis. Your Committee additionally finds that allowing limited extensions, with appropriate oversight and notice, will enable more thorough and accurate investigations while providing employees and employers with clearer expectations regarding the timing and resolution of complaints.
Your Committee has amended this measure by making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2324, H.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Third Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2324, H.D. 2.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce,
|
|
|
____________________________ SCOT Z. MATAYOSHI, Chair |
|
|
|
|
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 272-26
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2026
RE: H.B. No. 2324
H.D. 1
Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura
Speaker, House of Representatives
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2026
State of Hawaii
Madame:
Your Committee on Labor, to which was referred H.B. No. 2324 entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO THE HAWAII OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH LAW,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose of this measure is to:
(1) Repeal the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board and its rules regarding requiring a separate state crane operator certificate; and
(2) Allow additional time for the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations to complete an investigation of a discharge or discrimination complaint pertaining to employees exercising rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Law without formal extension.
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations.
Your Committee finds that the separate Hawaii crane operator certification established by the Hoisting Machine Operators Advisory Board is no longer necessary because the national certification standards adopted by the United States Department of Labor already ensure operator competence and workplace safety. Your Committee further finds that the existing ninety-day period for notifying employees of whistleblower determinations does not always provide the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations sufficient time to complete investigations, which can create uncertainty for employees and employers. This measure seeks to modernize and streamline worker-protection laws by removing outdated state certification requirements and establishing a clearer, more practical timeline that allows thorough whistleblower investigations, while providing greater predictability for employees and employers.
Your Committee has amended this measure by:
(1) Repealing language that required the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations to regulate hoisting machines and certify their operators;
(2) Changing the effective date to July 1, 3000, to encourage further discussion; and
(3) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Labor that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2324, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2324, H.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Labor,
|
|
|
____________________________ JACKSON D. SAYAMA, Chair |
|
Date
|
Testimony PDF
|
|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026 | HB2324_SD1_TESTIMONY_JDC_04-07-26_.PDF |
| Mar 18, 2026 | HB2324_HD2_TESTIMONY_LBT_03-18-26_.PDF |
| Mar 3, 2026 | HB2324_HD1_TESTIMONY_CPC_03-03-26_.PDF |
| Feb 10, 2026 | HB2324_TESTIMONY_LAB_02-10-26_.PDF |
Discussed in Hearing
Senate Standing Committee on Labor and Technology
Senate Standing Committee on Labor and Technology
House Standing Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce
House Standing Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce
House Standing Committee on Labor
House Standing Committee on Labor
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):