HB 2091: Judiciary Package; Public Employers; Public Servants; Harassment; Temporary Restraining Orders; Injunctions; Appropriation

A BILL FOR AN ACT

RELATING TO PETITIONS TO TEMPORARILY RESTRAIN AND ENJOIN HARASSMENT OF AN EMPLOYEE.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

     SECTION 1.  The legislature finds that state law currently allows a person to obtain a temporary restraining order and an injunction against harassment.  The legislature further finds that there is a need to extend these protections to allow employers to protect employees against employment-related harassment.  In recent times, employees in the public and private sectors across the country have experienced an alarming increase in harassment, acts of violence, or threats to engage in acts of violence in the course and scope of their work.

     The legislature also finds that in the public sector, numerous studies and reports confirm this trend.  For example, a 2021 study titled "On the Frontlines of Today's Cities:  Trauma, Challenges and Solutions" by the National League of Cities found that eighty-one per cent of local public officials surveyed said they had experienced harassment, threats, or violence in recent years.  In addition to having their safety and well-being threatened, the report found that harassment and violent behavior interrupted local officials' ability to do their jobs and led to the loss of institutional knowledge due to resignations.

     The legislature additionally finds that in 2024, the National League of Cities conducted a survey as an update to the earlier 2021 report, polling mayors, city council members, and city managers about their personal experiences of harassment as part of their work.  Seventy-three per cent of surveyed mayors, city council members, and city managers reported personally experiencing harassment as part of their work.  Of those who experienced harassment, eighty-nine per cent experienced harassment on social media and eighty-four per cent experienced harassment during public city meetings.  Twenty-three per cent of respondents reported harassment of their family or loved ones.

     The legislature further finds that other public servants, including state legislators and judges, have experienced increasing threats or attacks.  In a series of national surveys completed in October 2023, the Brennan Center for Justice, based on data sets representing more than one thousand seven hundred officials from all fifty states, found that more than forty per cent of state legislators experienced threats or attacks within the past three years, and eighty-nine per cent of state legislators experienced insults or harassment, including stalking.

     The legislature further finds that data gathered by the federal and state courts illustrates that the trend of threats and inappropriate communications against public officials is increasing.  United States Marshals Service data from 2025 shows one hundred sixty-two federal judges were threatened in March and early April 2025.  At the state level, the number of threats and other inappropriate communications received by Hawaii judges has increased tenfold since 2012.

     The legislature notes that allowing an employer to seek an order of protection on behalf of employees to enjoin employment‑related harassment has been a feature of California law for some time.  In the 1990s, California enacted a law to allow an employer to obtain a protective order on behalf of an employee.  The law is presently codified in section 527.8 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.  In the decades since this law was enacted, employers in California, including government entities, have obtained restraining orders to prohibit a person from harassing their employees.

     The legislature further notes that under existing state law, there is no general mechanism for state entities to obtain a temporary restraining order or permanent injunction on behalf of a harassed public employee.  Pursuant to section 26-7 and chapter 28, Hawaii Revised Statutes, the attorney general serves as the chief legal officer for the State.  Consistent with that role, the department of the attorney general's primary function in litigation is to represent the State and its agencies in civil actions.  In that regard, requiring the department to represent public employees in their personal capacities as plaintiffs in civil suits, irrespective of the merits of those suits, could create conflicts of interest and unintended consequences.  Therefore, the legislature finds that authorizing the retention of private legal counsel on behalf of a harassed public employee is the most appropriate mechanism for securing legal representation in these circumstances.

     Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to establish a two‑year pilot project to expand protections against employment‑related harassment by allowing public employers to secure a temporary restraining order and an injunction on behalf of a harassed employee under specified circumstances.

     SECTION 2.  Section 604-10.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

     "§604-10.5  Power to enjoin and temporarily restrain harassment.  (a)  For the purposes of this section:

     "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over any period of time evidencing a continuity of purpose.

     "Harassment" means:

     (1)  Physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or the threat of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, or assault; or

     (2)  An intentional or knowing course of conduct directed at an individual that seriously alarms or disturbs consistently or continually bothers the individual and serves no legitimate purpose; provided that such course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress.

     "Public employer" means:

     (1)  The State or any of its political subdivisions;

     (2)  A federal agency;

     (3)  The United States courts; or

     (4)  A public or quasi-public corporation, or any public agency thereof or therein,

and any agent thereof.

     "Public servant" means:

     (1)  Any officer or employee of the executive branch, including the governor; lieutenant governor; the administrative director appointed pursuant to section 26-3; and any volunteer of the office of elections;

     (2)  Any member of the legislature and any officer or employee of the legislative branch;

     (3)  Any official or employee of the judicial branch, including the administrative director of the courts, the deputy administrative director of the courts, and any active, formerly active, or retired:

          (A)  Justice of the Hawaii supreme court;

          (B)  Judge of the Hawaii intermediate appellate court;

          (C)  Judge of a Hawaii circuit court or circuit family court;

          (D)  Judge of a Hawaii district court or district family court; or

          (E)  Per diem judge of a Hawaii district court or district family court;

     (4)  Any officer or employee of any political subdivision of the State; or

     (5)  Any active, formerly active, or retired:

          (A)  Justice of the United States Supreme Court;

          (B)  Judge of the United States Court of Appeals;

          (C)  Judge or magistrate judge of the United States District Court; or

          (D)  Judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court,

          who resides in the State, formerly resided in the State while serving as a federal judge, or owns real property in the State.

     "Public servant of the State" means a public servant as defined in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of the definition of "public servant".  Notwithstanding any other law, including section 710-1000, "public servant of the State" does not include individuals not expressly provided in this definition.

     (b)  The district courts shall have the power to enjoin, prohibit, or temporarily restrain harassment.

     (c)  Any person who has been subjected to harassment, or the public employer of a public servant who has been subjected to harassment related to their employment as a public servant, may petition the district court for a temporary restraining order and an injunction from further harassment in the district in which:

     (1)  The petitioner resides or is temporarily located;

     (2)  The respondent resides; or

     (3)  The harassment occurred.

     (d)  A petition for relief from harassment shall be in writing [and], shall allege that a past act or acts of harassment may have occurred or that threats of harassment make it probable that acts of harassment may be imminent[;], and shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath or a statement made under penalty of perjury stating the specific facts and circumstances for which relief is sought.

     (e)  Upon petition to a district court under this section, the court may allow a petition, complaint, motion, or other document to be filed identifying the petitioner as "jane doe" or "john doe"; provided that the court finds that the "jane doe" or "john doe" filing is reasonably necessary to protect the privacy of the petitioner and will not unduly prejudice the prosecution or the defense of the action.

     In considering a petition requesting a "jane doe" or "john doe" filing, the court shall weigh the petitioner's interest in privacy against the public interest in disclosure.

     The court, only after finding clear and convincing evidence that would make public inspection inconsistent with the purpose of this section, may seal from the public all documents or portions of documents, including all subsequently filed documents, that would identify the petitioner or contain sufficient information from which the petitioner's identity could be discerned or inferred.  Access to identifying information may be permitted to law enforcement or other authorized authority, in the course of conducting official business, to effectuate service, enforcement, or prosecution, or as ordered by the courts.

     (f)  Upon petition to a district court under this section, the court may temporarily restrain the person or persons named in the petition from harassing the petitioner or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed upon a determination that there is probable cause to believe that a past act or acts of harassment have occurred or that a threat or threats of harassment may be imminent.  The court may issue an ex parte temporary restraining order either in writing or orally; provided that oral orders shall be reduced to writing by the close of the next court day following oral issuance.

     (g)  A temporary restraining order that is granted under this section shall remain in effect at the discretion of the court for a period not to exceed ninety days from the date the order is granted, including, in the case where a temporary restraining order restrains any party from harassing a minor, for a period extending to a date after the minor has reached eighteen years of age.  A hearing on the petition to enjoin harassment shall be held within fifteen days after the temporary restraining order is granted.  If service of the temporary restraining order has not been effected before the date of the hearing on the petition to enjoin, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the new date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted.

     The parties named in the petition may file or give oral responses explaining, excusing, justifying, or denying the alleged act or acts of harassment.  The court shall receive all evidence that is relevant at the hearing and may make independent inquiry.

     If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that harassment as defined in paragraph (1) of that definition exists, it may enjoin for no more than three years further harassment of the petitioner[,] or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed, or that harassment as defined in paragraph (2) of that definition exists, it shall enjoin for no more than three years further harassment of the petitioner[,] or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed, including, in the case where any party is enjoined from harassing a minor, for a period extending to a date after the minor has reached eighteen years of age; provided that this subsection shall not prohibit the court from issuing other injunctions against the named parties even if the time to which the injunction applies exceeds a total of three years.

     Any order issued under this section shall be served upon the respondent.  For the purposes of this section, "served" means actual personal service, service by certified mail, or proof that the respondent was present at the hearing at which the court orally issued the injunction.

     Where service of a restraining order or injunction has been made or where the respondent is deemed to have received notice of a restraining order or injunction order, any knowing or intentional violation of the restraining order or injunction order shall subject the respondent to the provisions in subsection (i).

     Any order issued shall be transmitted to the chief of police of the county in which the order is issued by way of regular mail, facsimile transmission, or other similar means of transmission.

     (h)  The court may grant the prevailing party in an action brought under this section costs and fees, including attorney's fees.

     (i)  A knowing or intentional violation of a restraining order or injunction issued pursuant to this section [is] shall be a misdemeanor.  The court shall sentence a violator to appropriate counseling and shall sentence a person convicted under this section as follows:

     (1)  For a violation of an injunction or restraining order that occurs after a conviction for a violation of the same injunction or restraining order, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum jail sentence of [not] no less than forty-eight hours; and

     (2)  For any subsequent violation that occurs after a second conviction for violation of the same injunction or restraining order, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum jail sentence of [not] no less than thirty days.

     The court may suspend any jail sentence, except for the mandatory sentences under paragraphs (1) and (2), upon appropriate conditions, [such as] including that the defendant remain alcohol- and drug-free, remain conviction-free, or complete court‑ordered assessments or counseling.  The court may suspend the mandatory sentences under paragraphs (1) and (2) where the violation of the injunction or restraining order does not involve violence or the threat of violence.  Nothing in this section shall be construed [as limiting] to limit the discretion of the judge to impose additional sanctions authorized in sentencing for a misdemeanor offense.

     (j)  Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit constitutionally protected activity.

     (k)  A petition filed by the public employer of a public servant under this section shall identify the "petitioner" as the respective branch of government, department, or agency; provided that the state judiciary shall be identified as the "Administrative Director of the Courts".

     (l)  Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, including chapter 91, subject to the availability of funds appropriated for this purpose, the department of the attorney general shall establish a system by which a public employer of a public servant of the State may retain a private attorney to provide representation to the public employer to pursue an action under this section on behalf of a public servant of the State; provided that under no circumstance shall a public employer of a public servant of the State be permitted to retain a private attorney under this subsection if the person to be restrained is in the same branch of government.  Under no circumstances shall the attorney general, the first deputy attorney general, the special assistant to the attorney general, or any deputy attorney general provide representation to a public employer or a public servant under this section.

     (m)  Staff attorneys for the judiciary may represent a public servant of the State employed by the judiciary.  Notwithstanding subsection (l), the judiciary may utilize its own funds to retain a private attorney to represent a public servant of the State employed by the judiciary.

     (n)  The authorization for a public employer to petition for relief under this section on behalf of a public servant is discretionary.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to:

     (1)  Create a duty for a public employer to petition for relief on behalf of a public servant;

     (2)  Authorize a private right of action, whether in law or in equity, against the State or a public employer, including the administrative director of the courts or any public official, whether in an official or individual capacity, relating to or arising out of the filing of a petition for relief or a decision to decline to petition for relief under this section, and no court shall have subject matter jurisdiction to consider any claims relating to the same; or

     (3)  Authorize a private right of action, whether in law or in equity, against the State, the department of the attorney general, or any officer or employee of the department of the attorney general, whether in an official or individual capacity, relating to or arising out of subsection (l), and no court shall have subject matter jurisdiction to consider any claims relating to the same."

     SECTION 3.  There is appropriated out of the general revenues of the State of Hawaii the sum of $           or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2026–2027 to establish a system for retaining private attorneys to provide representation for public employees of the State under the pilot project established pursuant to this Act.

     The sum appropriated shall be expended by the department of the attorney general for the purposes of this Act.

     SECTION 4.  The appropriation made by this Act shall not lapse at the end of the fiscal biennium for which the appropriation is made; provided that all moneys from the appropriation unencumbered as of June 30, 2028, shall lapse as of that date.

     SECTION 5.  Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken.  New statutory material is underscored.

     SECTION 6.  This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000; provided that this Act shall be repealed on June 30, 2028, and section 604-10.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, shall be reenacted in the form in which it read on the day prior to the effective date of this Act.

Report Title:

Judiciary Package; Public Employers; Public Servants; Harassment; Temporary Restraining Orders; Injunctions; Appropriation

Description:

Establishes a two-year pilot project to authorize public employers to petition for temporary restraining orders and injunctions against employment-related harassment of certain public employees.  Appropriates funds.  Sunsets 6/30/2028.  Effective 7/1/3000.  (SD1)

The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.

A BILL FOR AN ACT

RELATING TO PETITIONS TO TEMPORARILY RESTRAIN AND ENJOIN HARASSMENT OF AN EMPLOYEE.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

     SECTION 1.  The legislature finds that state law currently allows a person to obtain a temporary restraining order and an injunction against harassment.  The legislature further finds that there is a need to extend these protections to allow employers to protect employees against employment-related harassment.  In recent times, employees in the public and private sectors across the country have experienced an alarming increase in harassment, acts of violence, or threats to engage in acts of violence in the course and scope of their work.

     The legislature also finds that in the public sector, numerous studies and reports confirm this trend.  For example, a 2021 study titled "On the Frontlines of Today's Cities:  Trauma, Challenges and Solutions" by the National League of Cities found that eighty-one per cent of local public officials surveyed said they had experienced harassment, threats, or violence in recent years.  In addition to having their safety and well-being threatened, the report found that harassment and violent behavior interrupted local officials' ability to do their jobs and led to the loss of institutional knowledge due to resignations.

     The legislature additionally finds that in 2024, the National League of Cities conducted a survey as an update to the earlier 2021 report, polling mayors, city council members, and city managers about their personal experiences of harassment as part of their work.  Seventy-three per cent of surveyed mayors, city council members, and city managers reported personally experiencing harassment as part of their work.  Of those who experienced harassment, eighty-nine per cent experienced harassment on social media and eighty-four per cent experienced harassment during public city meetings.  Twenty-three per cent of respondents reported harassment of their family or loved ones.

     The legislature further finds that other public servants, including state legislators and judges, have experienced increasing threats or attacks.  In a series of national surveys completed in October 2023, the Brennan Center for Justice, based on data sets representing more than one thousand seven hundred officials from all fifty states, found that more than forty per cent of state legislators experienced threats or attacks within the past three years, and eighty-nine per cent of state legislators experienced insults or harassment, including stalking.

     The legislature further finds that data gathered by the federal and state courts illustrates that the trend of threats and inappropriate communications against public officials is increasing.  United States Marshals Service data from 2025 shows one hundred sixty-two federal judges were threatened in March and early April 2025.  At the state level, the number of threats and other inappropriate communications received by Hawaii judges has increased tenfold since 2012.

     The legislature notes that allowing an employer to seek an order of protection on behalf of employees to enjoin employment-related harassment has been a feature of California law for some time.  In the 1990s, California enacted a law to allow an employer to obtain a protective order on behalf of an employee.  The law is presently codified in section 527.8 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.  In the decades since this law was enacted, employers in California, including government entities, have obtained restraining orders to prohibit a person from harassing their employees.

     Under existing state law, there is no general mechanism by which state entities may seek a temporary restraining order or an injunction against harassment on behalf of a harassed public employee.  Under article V, section 6, of the Hawaii State Constitution, the attorney general is the chief legal officer of the State.  Consistent with that constitutional role, the department of the attorney general's primary function in litigation is to represent the State and its agencies in civil actions.  However, requiring the department to represent public employees in their personal capacity as plaintiffs in civil actions, regardless of the merits of those actions, could create conflicts of interest and unintended consequences.  Accordingly, the legislature finds that authorizing the retention of private legal counsel on behalf of a harassed public employee is the most appropriate mechanism for providing legal representation in these circumstances.

     Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to establish a two-year pilot project to expand protections against employment-related harassment by allowing public employers to secure a temporary restraining order and an injunction on behalf of a harassed employee under specified circumstances.

     SECTION 2.  Section 604-10.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

     "§604-10.5  Power to enjoin and temporarily restrain harassment.  (a)  For the purposes of this section:

     "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over any period of time evidencing a continuity of purpose.

     "Harassment" means:

     (1)  Physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or the threat of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, or assault; or

     (2)  An intentional or knowing course of conduct directed at an individual that seriously alarms or disturbs consistently or continually bothers the individual and serves no legitimate purpose; provided that such course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress.

     "Public employer" means:

     (1)  The State or any of its political subdivisions;

     (2)  A federal agency;

     (3)  The United States courts; or

     (4)  A public or quasi-public corporation, or any public agency thereof or therein,

and any agent thereof.

     "Public servant" means:

     (1)  Any officer or employee of the executive branch, including the governor; lieutenant governor; the administrative director appointed pursuant to section 26-3; and any volunteer of the office of elections;

     (2)  Any member of the legislature and any officer or employee of the legislative branch;

     (3)  Any official or employee of the judicial branch, including the administrative director of the courts, the deputy administrative director of the courts, and any active, formerly active, or retired:

          (A)  Justice of the Hawaii supreme court;

          (B)  Judge of the Hawaii intermediate appellate court;

          (C)  Judge of a Hawaii circuit court or circuit family court;

          (D)  Judge of a Hawaii district court or district family court; or

          (E)  Per diem judge of a Hawaii district court or district family court;

     (4)  Any officer or employee of any political subdivision of the State; or

     (5)  Any active, formerly active, or retired:

          (A)  Justice of the United States Supreme Court;

          (B)  Judge of the United States Court of Appeals;

          (C)  Judge or magistrate judge of the United States District Court; or

          (D)  Judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court,

          who resides in the State, formerly resided in the State while serving as a federal judge, or owns real property in the State.

     "Public servant of the State" means a public servant as defined in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of the definition of "public servant".  "Public servant of the State" does not include any other individual, notwithstanding section 710-1000 or any other law, unless expressly provided in this definition.

     (b)  The district courts shall have the power to enjoin, prohibit, or temporarily restrain harassment.

     (c)  Any person who has been subjected to harassment, or the public employer of a public servant who has been subjected to harassment related to their employment as a public servant, may petition the district court for a temporary restraining order and an injunction from further harassment in the district in which:

     (1)  The petitioner resides or is temporarily located;

     (2)  The respondent resides; or

     (3)  The harassment occurred.

     (d)  A petition for relief from harassment shall be in writing and shall allege that a past act or acts of harassment may have occurred or that threats of harassment make it probable that acts of harassment may be imminent[;], and shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath or statement made under penalty of perjury stating the specific facts and circumstances for which relief is sought.

     (e)  Upon petition to a district court under this section, the court may allow a petition, complaint, motion, or other document to be filed identifying the petitioner as "jane doe" or "john doe"; provided that the court finds that the "jane doe" or "john doe" filing is reasonably necessary to protect the privacy of the petitioner and will not unduly prejudice the prosecution or the defense of the action.

     In considering a petition requesting a "jane doe" or "john doe" filing, the court shall weigh the petitioner's interest in privacy against the public interest in disclosure.

     The court, only after finding clear and convincing evidence that would make public inspection inconsistent with the purpose of this section, may seal from the public all documents or portions of documents, including all subsequently filed documents, that would identify the petitioner or contain sufficient information from which the petitioner's identity could be discerned or inferred.  Access to identifying information may be permitted to law enforcement or other authorized authority, in the course of conducting official business, to effectuate service, enforcement, or prosecution, or as ordered by the courts.

     (f)  Upon petition to a district court under this section, the court may temporarily restrain the person or persons named in the petition from harassing the petitioner or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed upon a determination that there is probable cause to believe that a past act or acts of harassment have occurred or that a threat or threats of harassment may be imminent.  The court may issue an ex parte temporary restraining order either in writing or orally; provided that oral orders shall be reduced to writing by the close of the next court day following oral issuance.

     (g)  A temporary restraining order that is granted under this section shall remain in effect at the discretion of the court for a period not to exceed ninety days from the date the order is granted, including, in the case where a temporary restraining order restrains any party from harassing a minor, for a period extending to a date after the minor has reached eighteen years of age.  A hearing on the petition to enjoin harassment shall be held within fifteen days after the temporary restraining order is granted.  If service of the temporary restraining order has not been effected before the date of the hearing on the petition to enjoin, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the new date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted.

     The parties named in the petition may file or give oral responses explaining, excusing, justifying, or denying the alleged act or acts of harassment.  The court shall receive all evidence that is relevant at the hearing and may make independent inquiry.

     If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that harassment as defined in paragraph (1) of that definition exists, it may enjoin for no more than three years further harassment of the petitioner[,] or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed, or that harassment as defined in paragraph (2) of that definition exists, it shall enjoin for no more than three years further harassment of the petitioner[,] or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed, including, in the case where any party is enjoined from harassing a minor, for a period extending to a date after the minor has reached eighteen years of age; provided that this subsection shall not prohibit the court from issuing other injunctions against the named parties even if the time to which the injunction applies exceeds a total of three years.

     Any order issued under this section shall be served upon the respondent.  For the purposes of this section, "served" means actual personal service, service by certified mail, or proof that the respondent was present at the hearing at which the court orally issued the injunction.

     Where service of a restraining order or injunction has been made or where the respondent is deemed to have received notice of a restraining order or injunction order, any knowing or intentional violation of the restraining order or injunction order shall subject the respondent to the provisions in subsection (i).

     Any order issued shall be transmitted to the chief of police of the county in which the order is issued by way of regular mail, facsimile transmission, or other similar means of transmission.

     (h)  The court may grant the prevailing party in an action brought under this section costs and fees, including attorney's fees.

     (i)  A knowing or intentional violation of a restraining order or injunction issued pursuant to this section [is] shall be a misdemeanor.  The court shall sentence a violator to appropriate counseling and shall sentence a person convicted under this section as follows:

     (1)  For a violation of an injunction or restraining order that occurs after a conviction for a violation of the same injunction or restraining order, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum jail sentence of [not] no less than forty-eight hours; and

     (2)  For any subsequent violation that occurs after a second conviction for violation of the same injunction or restraining order, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum jail sentence of [not] no less than thirty days.

     The court may suspend any jail sentence, except for the mandatory sentences under paragraphs (1) and (2), upon appropriate conditions, [such as] including that the defendant remain alcohol- and drug-free, remain conviction-free, or complete court‑ordered assessments or counseling.  The court may suspend the mandatory sentences under paragraphs (1) and (2) where the violation of the injunction or restraining order does not involve violence or the threat of violence.  Nothing in this section shall be construed [as limiting] to limit the discretion of the judge to impose additional sanctions authorized in sentencing for a misdemeanor offense.

     (j)  Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit constitutionally protected activity.

     (k)  A petition filed by the public employer of a public servant under this section shall identify the petitioner as the respective branch of government, department, or agency; provided that the state judiciary shall be identified as the administrative director of the courts.

     (l)  Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, including chapter 91, subject to the availability of funds appropriated for this purpose, the department of the attorney general shall establish a system by which a public employer of a public servant of the State may retain a private attorney to provide representation to the public employer to pursue an action under this section on behalf of a public servant of the State; provided that under no circumstance shall a public employer of a public servant of the State be permitted to retain a private attorney under this subsection if the person to be restrained is in the same branch of government.  Under no circumstances shall the attorney general, the first deputy attorney general, the special assistant to the attorney general, or any deputy attorney general provide representation to a public employer or a public servant under this section.

     (m)  Staff attorneys for the judiciary may represent a public servant of the State employed by the judiciary.  Notwithstanding subsection (l), the judiciary may utilize its own funds to retain a private attorney to represent a public servant of the State employed by the judiciary.

     (n)  The authorization for a public employer to petition for relief under this section on behalf of a public servant is discretionary.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to:

     (1)  Create a duty for a public employer to petition for relief on behalf of a public servant;

     (2)  Authorize a private right of action, whether in law or in equity, against the State or a public employer, including the administrative director of the courts, or any public official, whether in an official or individual capacity, relating to or arising out of the filing of a petition for relief or a decision to decline to petition for relief under this section, and no court shall have subject matter jurisdiction to consider any claims relating to the same; or

     (3)  Authorize a private right of action, whether in law or in equity, against the State, the department of the attorney general, or any officer or employee of the department of the attorney general, whether in an official or individual capacity, relating to or arising out of subsection (l), and no court shall have subject matter jurisdiction to consider any claims relating to the same."

     SECTION 3.  There is appropriated out of the general revenues of the State of Hawaii the sum of $           or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2026–2027 to establish a system for retaining private attorneys to provide representation for public employees of the State pursuant to section 604-10.5(l), Hawaii Revised Statutes.

     The sum appropriated shall be expended by the department of the attorney general for the purposes of this Act.

     SECTION 4.  The appropriation made by this Act shall not lapse at the end of the fiscal biennium for which the appropriation is made; provided that all moneys from the appropriation unencumbered as of June 30, 2028, shall lapse as of that date.

     SECTION 5.  Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken.  New statutory material is underscored.

     SECTION 6.  This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000; provided that this Act shall be repealed on June 30, 2028, and section 604-10.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, shall be reenacted in the form in which it read on the day prior to the effective date of this Act.

Report Title:

Judiciary Package; Public Employers; Public Servants; Harassment; Temporary Restraining Orders; Injunctions

Description:

Establishes a two-year pilot project to authorize public employers to petition for temporary restraining orders and injunctions against employment-related harassment of certain public employees.  Sunsets 6/30/2028.  Effective 7/1/3000.  (HD2)

The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.

A BILL FOR AN ACT

RELATING TO PETITIONS TO TEMPORARILY RESTRAIN AND ENJOIN HARASSMENT OF AN EMPLOYEE.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

     SECTION 1.  The legislature finds that state law currently allows a person to obtain a temporary restraining order and injunction against harassment.  The legislature finds that there is a need to extend these protections to allow employers to protect employees against employment-related harassment.

     In recent times, employees in the public and private sectors across the country have experienced an alarming increase in harassment, acts of violence, or threats to engage in acts of violence.

     In the public sector, numerous studies and reports confirm this trend.  For example, a 2021 study titled "On the Frontlines of Today's Cities:  Trauma, Challenges and Solutions" by the National League of Cities found that eighty-one per cent of local public officials surveyed said they had experienced harassment, threats, or violence in recent years.  In addition to having their safety and well-being threatened, the report found that harassment and violent behavior interrupted local officials' ability to do their jobs and led to the loss of institutional knowledge due to resignations.

     In 2024, the National League of Cities conducted a survey as an update to the earlier 2021 report, polling mayors, city council members, and city managers about their personal experiences of harassment as part of their work.  Seventy-three per cent of surveyed mayors, city council members, and city managers reported personally experiencing harassment as part of their work.  Of those who experienced harassment, eighty-nine per cent experienced harassment on social media and eighty-four per cent experienced harassment during public city meetings.  Twenty-three per cent of respondents reported harassment of their family or loved ones.

     Other public servants, including state legislators and judges, have experienced increasing threats or attacks.  In a series of national surveys completed in October 2023, the Brennan Center for Justice, based on data sets representing more than one thousand seven hundred officials from all fifty states, found that more than forty per cent of state legislators experienced threats or attacks within the past three years, and eighty-nine per cent of state legislators experienced insults or harassment, including stalking.

     The legislature also finds that data gathered by the federal and state courts illustrates that the trend of threats and inappropriate communications against public officials is increasing.  United States Marshals Service data from 2025 shows one hundred sixty-two federal judges were threatened in March and early April 2025.  At the state level, the number of threats and other inappropriate communications to Hawaii judges has increased tenfold since 2012.

     Allowing an employer to seek an order of protection in favor of employees to enjoin employment-related harassment has been a feature of California law for some time.

     In the 1990s, California enacted a law to allow an employer to obtain a protective order on behalf of an employee.  In the decades since this law was enacted, employers in California, including government entities, have obtained restraining orders to prohibit a person from harassing their employees.

     A few examples from California applying this law illustrate the type of threats made against employees and how the law has been utilized to restrain the threatening conduct.

     First, the Administrative Office of the Courts of the State of California successfully petitioned the court for a protective order when a party in a family court matter, on the day he learned a decision was unfavorable to him, made repeated threats to kill the judicial official who had rendered the decision.  Admin. Office of Courts v. Valdez, No. A127094, 2010 WL 5264573, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 27, 2010).

     Second, the County of Los Angeles obtained restraining orders on behalf of five employees, all women, to protect them from a member of the public who stalked and threatened to commit sexual violence against them.  Cnty. of Los Angeles v. Herman, No. B333177, 2024 WL 4997864, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2024).

     In a third example, the Board of Trustees of California State University obtained restraining orders on behalf of three employees to protect them from a terminated employee who had purchased firearms and ammunition and who had made threats to kill them or other violent statements.  Bd. of Trustees of California State Univ. v. D.S., No. C100001, 2025 WL 2449509, at *6 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 26, 2025).

     The legislature further finds that a temporary restraining order or injunction provides additional protection to the harassed employee.  For example, under section 134-7(f), Hawaii Revised Statutes, a person under a restraining order is required to relinquish possession and control of any firearm and ammunition owned by that person to the police department.  This surrendering of a lawfully registered firearm and ammunition by a restrained person is a policy that the legislature finds should be expanded.

     Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to expand protections against employment-related harassment by allowing public employers to secure a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction on behalf of a harassed employee.

     SECTION 2.  Section 604-10.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

     "§604-10.5  Power to enjoin and temporarily restrain harassment.  (a)  For the purposes of this section:

     "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over any period of time evidencing a continuity of purpose.

     "Credible threat of violence" means a knowing and wilful statement or course of conduct that would place a reasonable person in fear for their safety amounting to a threat of grave or serious physical harm, bodily injury, or assault, and that serves no legitimate purpose.

     "Harassment" means:

     (1)  Physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or the threat of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, or assault; or

     (2)  An intentional or knowing course of conduct directed at an individual that seriously alarms or disturbs consistently or continually bothers the individual and serves no legitimate purpose; provided that such course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress.

     "Public employer" means:

     (1)  The State or any of its political subdivisions;

     (2)  A federal agency;

     (3)  The United States courts; or

     (4)  A public or quasi-public corporation, or any public agency thereof or therein,

and any agent thereof.

     "Public servant" means:

     (1)  The governor;

     (2)  The lieutenant governor;

     (3)  The administrative director appointed pursuant to section 26-3;

     (4)  Any head of a department established under section 26‑4;

     (5)  Any member of the legislature;

     (6)  Any active, formerly active, or retired:

          (A)  Justice of the Hawaii supreme court;

          (B)  Judge of the Hawaii intermediate appellate court;

          (C)  Judge of a Hawaii circuit court or circuit family court;

          (D)  Judge of a Hawaii district court or district family court; or

          (E)  Per diem judge of a Hawaii district court or district family court;

     (7)  Any active, formerly active, or retired:

          (A)  Justice of the United States Supreme Court;

          (B)  Judge of the United States Court of Appeals;

          (C)  Judge or magistrate judge of the United States District Court; or

          (D)  Judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court,

          who resides in the State, formerly resided in the State while serving as a federal judge, or owns real property in the State;

     (8)  The administrative director of the courts;

     (9)  The deputy administrative director of the courts;

    (10)  Any employee or volunteer of the office of elections; or

    (11)  Any person designated for good cause by the governor, president of the senate, speaker of the house of representatives, administrative director of the courts, chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, or chairperson of the office of Hawaiian affairs in the designator's respective body.

"Public servant" does not include other public employees covered under chapter 76 or 89.

     "Unlawful violence" means grave or serious physical harm, bodily injury, or assault, or any violation of chapter 707.

     (b)  The district courts shall have the power to enjoin, prohibit, or temporarily restrain harassment.

     (c)  Any person who has been subjected to harassment, or any public employer of a public servant who has been subjected to harassment related to their employment as a public servant, may petition the district court for a temporary restraining order and an injunction from further harassment in the district in which:

     (1)  The petitioner resides or is temporarily located;

     (2)  The respondent resides; or

     (3)  The harassment occurred.

     (d)  A petition for relief from harassment shall be in writing and shall allege that a past act or acts of harassment may have occurred or that threats of harassment make it probable that acts of harassment may be imminent; and shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath or statement made under penalty of perjury stating the specific facts and circumstances for which relief is sought.

     (e)  Upon petition to a district court under this section, the court may allow a petition, complaint, motion, or other document to be filed identifying the petitioner as "jane doe" or "john doe"; provided that the court finds that the "jane doe" or "john doe" filing is reasonably necessary to protect the privacy of the petitioner and will not unduly prejudice the prosecution or the defense of the action.

     In considering a petition requesting a "jane doe" or "john doe" filing, the court shall weigh the petitioner's interest in privacy against the public interest in disclosure.

     The court, only after finding clear and convincing evidence that would make public inspection inconsistent with the purpose of this section, may seal from the public all documents or portions of documents, including all subsequently filed documents, that would identify the petitioner or contain sufficient information from which the petitioner's identity could be discerned or inferred.  Access to identifying information may be permitted to law enforcement or other authorized authority, in the course of conducting official business, to effectuate service, enforcement, or prosecution, or as ordered by the courts.

     (f)  Upon petition to a district court under this section, the court may temporarily restrain the person or persons named in the petition from harassing the petitioner or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed upon a determination that there is probable cause to believe that a past act or acts of harassment have occurred or that a threat or threats of harassment may be imminent.  The court may issue an ex parte temporary restraining order either in writing or orally; provided that oral orders shall be reduced to writing by the close of the next court day following oral issuance.

     (g)  A temporary restraining order that is granted under this section shall remain in effect at the discretion of the court for a period not to exceed ninety days from the date the order is granted, including, in the case where a temporary restraining order restrains any party from harassing a minor, for a period extending to a date after the minor has reached eighteen years of age.  A hearing on the petition to enjoin harassment, credible threat of violence, or unlawful violence shall be held within fifteen days after the temporary restraining order is granted.  If service of the temporary restraining order has not been effected before the date of the hearing on the petition to enjoin, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the new date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted.

     The parties named in the petition may file or give oral responses explaining, excusing, justifying, or denying the alleged act or acts of harassment.  The court shall receive all evidence that is relevant at the hearing and may make independent inquiry.

     If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that harassment as defined in paragraph (1) of that definition exists, it may enjoin for no more than three years further harassment of the petitioner[,] or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed, or that harassment as defined in paragraph (2) of that definition exists, it shall enjoin for no more than three years further harassment of the petitioner[,] or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed, including, in the case where any party is enjoined from harassing a minor, for a period extending to a date after the minor has reached eighteen years of age; provided that this subsection shall not prohibit the court from issuing other injunctions against the named parties even if the time to which the injunction applies exceeds a total of three years.

     If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that a credible threat of violence or unlawful violence exists, the court may enjoin for no more than three years further credible threat of violence or unlawful violence of the petitioner.  Clear and convincing evidence shall include all of the following:

     (1)  A report completed with a law enforcement agency with proper jurisdiction describing, at the minimum:

          (A)  That a public servant has suffered a credible threat of violence or unlawful violence by the respondent; and

          (B)  That the course of conduct at issue served no legitimate purpose; and

     (2)  Any reasonable proof to the satisfaction of the court.

     Any order issued under this section shall be served upon the respondent.  For the purposes of this section, "served" means actual personal service, service by certified mail, or proof that the respondent was present at the hearing at which the court orally issued the injunction.

     Where service of a restraining order or injunction has been made or where the respondent is deemed to have received notice of a restraining order or injunction order, any knowing or intentional violation of the restraining order or injunction order shall subject the respondent to the provisions in subsection (i).

     Any order issued shall be transmitted to the chief of police of the county in which the order is issued by way of regular mail, facsimile transmission, or other similar means of transmission.

     (h)  The court may grant the prevailing party in an action brought under this section costs and fees, including attorney's fees.

     (i)  A knowing or intentional violation of a restraining order or injunction issued pursuant to this section is a misdemeanor.  The court shall sentence a violator to appropriate counseling and shall sentence a person convicted under this section as follows:

     (1)  For a violation of an injunction or restraining order that occurs after a conviction for a violation of the same injunction or restraining order, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum jail sentence of not less than forty-eight hours; and

     (2)  For any subsequent violation that occurs after a second conviction for violation of the same injunction or restraining order, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum jail sentence of not less than thirty days.

     The court may suspend any jail sentence, except for the mandatory sentences under paragraphs (1) and (2), upon appropriate conditions, such as that the defendant remain alcohol- and drug-free, conviction-free, or complete court‑ordered assessments or counseling.  The court may suspend the mandatory sentences under paragraphs (1) and (2) where the violation of the injunction or restraining order does not involve violence or the threat of violence.  Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting the discretion of the judge to impose additional sanctions authorized in sentencing for a misdemeanor offense.

     (j)  Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit constitutionally protected activity.

     (k)  A petition under this section filed by a public employer of a public servant shall identify the "Petitioner" as the respective branch of government or department on behalf of the named public servant; provided that the state judiciary shall be identified as the "Administrative Director of the Courts".

     (l)  A public employer filing a petition under this section shall formally request representation by the department of the attorney general.  The attorney general may, in the attorney general's discretion and notwithstanding any other law to the contrary regarding legal representation of state employees, decline any request for representation made pursuant to this subsection or refer the request to another government legal representative for any reason the attorney general deems appropriate.

     (m)  The authorization for a public employer to petition for relief under this section on behalf of a public servant is discretionary.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to:

     (1)  Create a duty for a public employer to petition for relief on behalf of a public servant, even if the public employer has notice or reasonably has notice of an alleged employment-related credible threat of violence or unlawful violence; or

     (2)  Authorize a private right of action against a public employer that declines to petition for relief under this section.

     (n)  The public servant shall immediately notify law enforcement regarding any conduct or situation that poses an imminent danger or threat to the health or safety of any individual, the workplace, or the public."

     SECTION 3.  There is appropriated out of the general revenues of the State of Hawaii the sum of $           or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2026-2027 for the department of the attorney general to carry out the purposes of this Act.

     The sum appropriated shall be expended by the department of the attorney general for the purposes of this Act.

     SECTION 4.  Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken.  New statutory material is underscored.

     SECTION 5.  This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.

Report Title:

Judiciary Package; Public Employers; Public Servants; Harassment; Credible Threat of Violence; Unlawful Violence; Temporary Restraining Orders; Injunctions

Description:

Authorizes public employers to petition for temporary restraining orders and injunctions against employment-related harassment, credible threat of violence, or unlawful violence of certain public employees.  Effective 7/1/3000.  (HD1)

The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.

A BILL FOR AN ACT

RELATING TO petitions to temporarily restrain and enjoin harassment of an employee.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

     SECTION 1.  State law currently allows a person to obtain a temporary restraining order and injunction against harassment.  The legislature finds that there is a need to extend these protections to allow employers to protect employees against employment-related harassment.

     In recent times, employees in the public and private sectors across the country have experienced an alarming increase in harassment, acts of violence, or threats to engage in acts of violence.

     In the public sector, numerous studies and reports confirm this trend.  For example, a 2021 study titled "On the Frontlines of Today's Cities:  Trauma, Challenges and Solutions" by the National League of Cities found that eighty-one per cent of local public officials surveyed said they had experienced harassment, threats, or violence in recent years.  In addition to having their safety and well-being threatened, the report found that harassment and violent behavior interrupted local officials' ability to do their jobs and led to the loss of institutional knowledge due to resignations.

     In 2024, the National League of Cities conducted a survey as an update to the earlier 2021 report, polling mayors, city council members, and city managers about their personal experiences of harassment as part of their work.  Seventy-three per cent of surveyed mayors, city council members, and city managers reported personally experiencing harassment as part of their work.  Of those who experienced harassment, eighty-nine per cent experienced harassment on social media and eighty-four per cent experienced harassment during public city meetings.  Twenty-three per cent of respondents reported harassment of their family or loved ones.

     Other public servants, including state legislators and judges, have experienced increasing threats or attacks.  In a series of national surveys completed in October 2023, the Brennan Center for Justice, based on data sets representing more than one thousand seven hundred officials from all fifty states, found that more than forty per cent of state legislators experienced threats or attacks within the past three years, and eighty-nine per cent of state legislators experienced insults or harassment, including stalking.

     The legislature also finds that data gathered by the federal and state courts illustrates that the trend of threats and inappropriate communications against public officials is increasing.  United States Marshals Service data from 2025 shows one hundred sixty-two federal judges were threatened in March and early April 2025.  At the state level, the number of threats and other inappropriate communications to Hawaii judges has increased tenfold since 2012.

     Allowing an employer to seek an order of protection in favor of employees to enjoin employment-related harassment has been a feature of California law for some time.

     In the 1990s, California enacted a law to allow an employer to obtain a protective order on behalf of an employee.  The law is presently codified in section 527.8 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.  In the decades since this law was enacted, employers in California, including government entities, have obtained restraining orders to prohibit a person from harassing their employees.

     A few examples from California applying this law illustrate the type of threats made against employees and how the law has been utilized to restrain the threatening conduct.

     First, the Administrative Office of the Courts of the State of California successfully petitioned the court for a protective order when a party in a family court matter, on the day he learned a decision was unfavorable to him, made repeated threats to kill the judicial official who had rendered the decision.  Admin. Office of Courts v. Valdez, No. A127094, 2010 WL 5264573, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 27, 2010).

     Second, the County of Los Angeles obtained restraining orders on behalf of five employees, all women, to protect them from a member of the public who stalked and threatened to commit sexual violence against them.  Cnty. of Los Angeles v. Herman, No. B333177, 2024 WL 4997864, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2024).

     In a third example, the Board of Trustees of California State University obtained restraining orders on behalf of three employees to protect them from a terminated employee who had purchased firearms and ammunition and who had made threats to kill them or other violent statements.  Bd. of Trustees of California State Univ. v. D.S., No. C100001, 2025 WL 2449509, at *6 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 26, 2025).

     The legislature further finds that a temporary restraining order or injunction provides additional protection to the harassed employee.  For example, under section 134-7(f), Hawaii Revised Statutes, a person under a restraining order is required to relinquish possession and control of any firearm and ammunition owned by that person to the police department.  This surrendering of a lawfully registered firearm and ammunition by a restrained person is a policy that the legislature finds should be expanded.

     Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to expand protections against employment-related harassment by allowing public employers to secure a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction on behalf of a harassed employee.

     SECTION 2.  Section 604-10.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

     "§604-10.5  Power to enjoin and temporarily restrain harassment.  (a)  For the purposes of this section:

     "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over any period of time evidencing a continuity of purpose.

     "Harassment" means:

     (1)  Physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or the threat of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, or assault; or

     (2)  An intentional or knowing course of conduct directed at an individual that seriously alarms or disturbs consistently or continually bothers the individual and serves no legitimate purpose; provided that such course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress.

     "Public employer" means:

     (1)  The State or any of its political subdivisions;

     (2)  A federal agency;

     (3)  The United States courts; or

     (4)  A public or quasi-public corporation, or any public agency thereof or therein,

and any agent thereof.

     "Public servant" means:

     (1)  The governor;

     (2)  The lieutenant governor;

     (3)  The administrative director appointed pursuant to section 26-3;

     (4)  Any head of a department established under section 26‑4;

     (5)  Any member of the legislature;

     (6)  Any active, formerly active, or retired:

          (A)  Justice of the Hawaii supreme court;

          (B)  Judge of the Hawaii intermediate appellate court;

          (C)  Judge of a Hawaii circuit court or circuit family court;

          (D)  Judge of a Hawaii district court or district family court; or

          (E)  Per diem judge of a Hawaii district court or district family court;

     (7)  Any active, formerly active, or retired:

          (A)  Justice of the United States Supreme Court;

          (B)  Judge of the United States Court of Appeals;

          (C)  Judge or magistrate judge of the United States District Court; or

          (D)  Judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court,

          who resides in the State, formerly resided in the State while serving as a federal judge, or owns real property in the State;

     (8)  The administrative director of the courts;

     (9)  The deputy administrative director of the courts;

    (10)  Any employee or volunteer of the office of elections; or

    (11)  Any person designated for good cause by the governor, president of the senate, speaker of the house of representatives, administrative director of the courts, chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, or chairperson of the office of Hawaiian affairs in the designator's respective body.

     (b)  The district courts shall have the power to enjoin, prohibit, or temporarily restrain harassment.

     (c)  Any person who has been subjected to harassment, or any public employer of a public servant who has been subjected to harassment related to their employment as a public servant, may petition the district court for a temporary restraining order and an injunction from further harassment in the district in which:

     (1)  The petitioner resides or is temporarily located;

     (2)  The respondent resides; or

     (3)  The harassment occurred.

     (d)  A petition for relief from harassment shall be in writing and shall allege that a past act or acts of harassment may have occurred or that threats of harassment make it probable that acts of harassment may be imminent; and shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath or statement made under penalty of perjury stating the specific facts and circumstances for which relief is sought.

     (e)  Upon petition to a district court under this section, the court may allow a petition, complaint, motion, or other document to be filed identifying the petitioner as "jane doe" or "john doe"; provided that the court finds that the "jane doe" or "john doe" filing is reasonably necessary to protect the privacy of the petitioner and will not unduly prejudice the prosecution or the defense of the action.

     In considering a petition requesting a "jane doe" or "john doe" filing, the court shall weigh the petitioner's interest in privacy against the public interest in disclosure.

     The court, only after finding clear and convincing evidence that would make public inspection inconsistent with the purpose of this section, may seal from the public all documents or portions of documents, including all subsequently filed documents, that would identify the petitioner or contain sufficient information from which the petitioner's identity could be discerned or inferred.  Access to identifying information may be permitted to law enforcement or other authorized authority, in the course of conducting official business, to effectuate service, enforcement, or prosecution, or as ordered by the courts.

     (f)  Upon petition to a district court under this section, the court may temporarily restrain the person or persons named in the petition from harassing the petitioner or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed upon a determination that there is probable cause to believe that a past act or acts of harassment have occurred or that a threat or threats of harassment may be imminent.  The court may issue an ex parte temporary restraining order either in writing or orally; provided that oral orders shall be reduced to writing by the close of the next court day following oral issuance.

     (g)  A temporary restraining order that is granted under this section shall remain in effect at the discretion of the court for a period not to exceed ninety days from the date the order is granted, including, in the case where a temporary restraining order restrains any party from harassing a minor, for a period extending to a date after the minor has reached eighteen years of age.  A hearing on the petition to enjoin harassment shall be held within fifteen days after the temporary restraining order is granted.  If service of the temporary restraining order has not been effected before the date of the hearing on the petition to enjoin, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the new date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted.

     The parties named in the petition may file or give oral responses explaining, excusing, justifying, or denying the alleged act or acts of harassment.  The court shall receive all evidence that is relevant at the hearing and may make independent inquiry.

     If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that harassment as defined in paragraph (1) of that definition exists, it may enjoin for no more than three years further harassment of the petitioner[,] or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed, or that harassment as defined in paragraph (2) of that definition exists, it shall enjoin for no more than three years further harassment of the petitioner[,] or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed, including, in the case where any party is enjoined from harassing a minor, for a period extending to a date after the minor has reached eighteen years of age; provided that this subsection shall not prohibit the court from issuing other injunctions against the named parties even if the time to which the injunction applies exceeds a total of three years.

     Any order issued under this section shall be served upon the respondent.  For the purposes of this section, "served" means actual personal service, service by certified mail, or proof that the respondent was present at the hearing at which the court orally issued the injunction.

     Where service of a restraining order or injunction has been made or where the respondent is deemed to have received notice of a restraining order or injunction order, any knowing or intentional violation of the restraining order or injunction order shall subject the respondent to the provisions in subsection (i).

     Any order issued shall be transmitted to the chief of police of the county in which the order is issued by way of regular mail, facsimile transmission, or other similar means of transmission.

     (h)  The court may grant the prevailing party in an action brought under this section costs and fees, including attorney's fees.

     (i)  A knowing or intentional violation of a restraining order or injunction issued pursuant to this section is a misdemeanor.  The court shall sentence a violator to appropriate counseling and shall sentence a person convicted under this section as follows:

     (1)  For a violation of an injunction or restraining order that occurs after a conviction for a violation of the same injunction or restraining order, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum jail sentence of not less than forty-eight hours; and

     (2)  For any subsequent violation that occurs after a second conviction for violation of the same injunction or restraining order, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum jail sentence of not less than thirty days.

     The court may suspend any jail sentence, except for the mandatory sentences under paragraphs (1) and (2), upon appropriate conditions, such as that the defendant remain alcohol- and drug-free, conviction-free, or complete court‑ordered assessments or counseling.  The court may suspend the mandatory sentences under paragraphs (1) and (2) where the violation of the injunction or restraining order does not involve violence or the threat of violence.  Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting the discretion of the judge to impose additional sanctions authorized in sentencing for a misdemeanor offense.

     (j)  Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit constitutionally protected activity.

     (k)  A petition under this section filed by a public employer of a public servant shall identify the "Petitioner" as the respective branch of government or department; provided that the state judiciary shall be identified as the "Administrative Director of the Courts".

     (l)  The authorization for a public employer to petition for relief under this section on behalf of a public servant is discretionary.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to:

     (1)  Create a duty for a public employer to petition for relief on behalf of a public servant; or

     (2)  Authorize a private right of action against a public employer that declines to petition for relief under this section."

     SECTION 3.  Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken.  New statutory material is underscored.

     SECTION 4.  This Act shall take effect upon its approval.

Report Title:

Judiciary Package; Public Employers; Public Servants; Harassment; Temporary Restraining Orders; Injunctions

Description:

Authorizes public employers to petition for temporary restraining orders and injunctions against employment-related harassment of certain public employees.

The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.

STAND. COM. REP. NO.  1153-26

Honolulu, Hawaii

                , 2026

RE:   H.B. No. 2091

      H.D. 2

Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura

Speaker, House of Representatives

Thirty-Third State Legislature

Regular Session of 2026

State of Hawaii

Madame:

     Your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs, to which was referred H.B. No. 2091, H.D. 1, entitled:

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO PETITIONS TO TEMPORARILY RESTRAIN AND ENJOIN HARASSMENT OF AN EMPLOYEE,"

begs leave to report as follows:

     The purpose of this measure is to authorize public employers to petition for temporary restraining orders and injunctions against employment-related harassment, credible threats of violence, or unlawful violence against certain public employees.

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Judiciary and Department of Education.  Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Department of Human Services; Department of the Attorney General; Hawaii Government Employees Association, AFSCME Local 152, AFL-CIO; United Public Workers, AFSCME Local 646, AFL-CIO; and University of Hawaii Professional Assembly.

     Your Committee finds that there has been an alarming increase in harassment, acts of violence, and threats against public servants.  While existing law allows an individual to obtain a temporary restraining order against harassment on their own behalf, this measure will allow public employers to seek temporary restraining orders on behalf of certain employees based on public employment-related harassment.

     Your Committee recognizes that the Judiciary and Department of the Attorney General submitted testimony recommending that this measure be amended to incorporate the approach taken in the companion to this measure, S.B. No. 2567, S.D. 1 (Regular Session of 2026).

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

     (1)  Deleting its contents and inserting the contents of the companion measure, S.B. No. 2567, S.D. 1, a substantially similar measure that establishes a two-year pilot project authorizing public employers to petition for temporary restraining orders and injunctions to address employment-related harassment of certain public employees;

     (2)  Changing the effective date to July 1, 3000, to encourage further discussion; and

     (3)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2091, H.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Third Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2091, H.D. 2.

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs,

STAND. COM. REP. NO.  483-26

Honolulu, Hawaii

                , 2026

RE:   H.B. No. 2091

      H.D. 1

Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura

Speaker, House of Representatives

Thirty-Third State Legislature

Regular Session of 2026

State of Hawaii

Madame:

     Your Committee on Labor, to which was referred H.B. No. 2091 entitled:

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO PETITIONS TO TEMPORARILY RESTRAIN AND ENJOIN HARASSMENT OF AN EMPLOYEE,"

begs leave to report as follows:

     The purpose of this measure is to authorize public employers to petition for temporary restraining orders and injunctions against employment-related harassment of certain public employees.

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Judiciary; Department of Education; United Public Workers, AFSCME Local 646, AFL-CIO; and University of Hawaii Professional Assembly.  Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Department of the Attorney General and Hawaii Government Employees Association, AFSCME Local 152, AFL-CIO.

     Your Committee finds that employees in public and private sectors are facing increasing harassment, threats, and acts of violence that disrupt their ability to perform their duties and jeopardize workplace safety.  Your Committee further finds that allowing public employers to petition for temporary restraining orders and injunctions on behalf of harassed employees will provide an additional layer of protection and help deter harmful conduct directed at workers.  This measure strengthens workplace safety by authorizing employers to seek court‑ordered relief to prevent continued harassment.

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

     (1)  Defining the terms "credible threat of violence" and "unlawful violence";

     (2)  Specifying that the definition of "public servant" does not include other public employees under the Civil Service Law and collective bargaining in public employment;

     (3)  Requiring a hearing on a petition to enjoin a credible threat of violence or unlawful violence to be held within fifteen days after the temporary restraining order is granted;

     (4)  Establishing evidentiary standards and procedural requirements for credible threats of violence or unlawful violence;

     (5)  Clarifying that a petition filed by a public employer must identify the petitioner not only as the respective branch or department but acting on behalf of the named public servant;

     (6)  Requiring a public employer to formally request representation by the Department of the Attorney General and authorizing the Attorney General to decline any request or refer the request to another government legal representative;

     (7)  Clarifying that no duty to petition exists even when the employer has notice or reasonably should have notice of an alleged employment‑related credible threat of violence or unlawful violence;

     (8)  Requiring a public servant to immediately notify law enforcement regarding any conduct or situation that poses an imminent danger or threat;

     (9)  Appropriating an unspecified amount for the Department of the Attorney General to carry out the purposes of this measure;

     (10) Changing the effective date to July 1, 3000, to encourage further discussion; and

     (11) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Labor that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2091, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2091, H.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs.

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Labor,