SB 2115: Collective Bargaining in Public Employment; Repricing of Classes; Negotiations; Impasse Procedures; Arbitration
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2026-03-23
Current Status:
Failed
(2026-03-24: Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on FIN with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Garrett, Quinlan excused (2).)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Final Decking
Enacted
What does this bill do?
The bill changes how public employers and unions negotiate repricing of job classes for state and county employees by creating a new impasse process that allows a union to seek final, binding arbitration if the employer doesnt start talks or the parties fail to agree within 90 days. Arbitration would be by a single arbitrator chosen by the parties or from a board list if they cannot agree, and repricing requests are limited to once per occupation every 18 months with no more than 15 active repricing impasses at a time; the law sunsets June 30, 2029.
The summary is provided by generative AI which can make mistakes. For original language, please view the details in the table below.
Amends the collective bargaining negotiation procedure on the repricing of classes within a bargaining unit for public employees. Establishes an impasse procedure to be applied when an employer fails to initiate the negotiation or the parties fail to reach an agreement within 90 days. Repeals existing law that requires a different impasse procedure to apply in those situations. Sunsets 6/30/2029. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Amends the collective bargaining negotiation procedure on the repricing of classes within a bargaining unit for public employees. Establishes an impasse procedure to be applied when an employer fails to initiate the negotiation or the parties fail to reach an agreement within 90 days. Repeals existing law that requires a different impasse procedure to apply in those situations. Sunsets 6/30/2029. Effective 1/1/2077. (SD1)
Amends the collective bargaining negotiation procedure on the repricing of classes within a bargaining unit for public employees. Establishes an impasse procedure to be applied when an employer fails to initiate the negotiation or the parties fail to reach an agreement within certain timeframes. Repeals existing law that requires a different impasse procedure to apply in those situations. Sunsets 6/30/2029.
|
THE SENATE |
S.B. NO. |
2115 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
S.D. 1 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
H.D. 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 89-9, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§89-9
Scope of negotiations; consultation[.]; impasse
procedure for repricing.
(a) The employer and the
exclusive representative shall meet at reasonable times, including meetings
sufficiently in advance of the February 1 impasse date under section 89-11, and
shall negotiate in good faith with respect to wages, hours, the amounts of
contributions by the State and respective counties to the Hawaii employer-union
health benefits trust fund to the extent allowed in subsection (e), and other
terms and conditions of employment which are subject to collective bargaining
and which are to be embodied in a written agreement as specified in section
89-10[, but such]; provided that this obligation
does not compel either party to agree to a proposal or make a
concession.
(b) The employer or the exclusive representative desiring to initiate negotiations shall notify the other party in writing, setting forth the time and place of the meeting desired and the nature of the business to be discussed, sufficiently in advance of the meeting.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter,
all matters affecting employee relations, including those that are, or may be,
the subject of a rule adopted by the employer or any director, shall be subject
to consultation with the exclusive representatives of the employees
concerned. The employer shall make every
reasonable effort to consult with exclusive representatives and consider their
input, along with the input of other affected parties, [prior to] before
effecting changes in any major policy affecting employee relations.
(d) Excluded from the subjects of negotiations are matters of classification, reclassification, benefits of but not contributions to the Hawaii employer-union health benefits trust fund, recruitment, examination, initial pricing, and retirement benefits except as provided in section 88-8(h). The employer and the exclusive representative shall not agree to any proposal that would be inconsistent with the merit principle or the principle of equal pay for equal work pursuant to section 76‑1 or that would interfere with the rights and obligations of a public employer to:
(1) Direct employees;
(2) Determine qualifications, standards for work, and the nature and contents of examinations;
(3) Hire, promote, transfer, assign, and retain employees in positions;
(4) Suspend, demote, discharge, or take other disciplinary action against employees for proper cause;
(5) Relieve an employee from duties because of lack of work or other legitimate reason;
(6) Maintain efficiency and productivity, including maximizing the use of advanced technology, in government operations;
(7) Determine methods, means, and personnel by which the employer's operations are to be conducted; and
(8) Take actions as may be necessary to carry out the missions of the employer in cases of emergencies.
This
subsection shall not be used to invalidate provisions of collective bargaining
agreements in effect on and after June 30, 2007, and except as otherwise
provided in this chapter, shall not preclude negotiations over the
implementation of management decisions that affect terms and conditions of
employment that are subject to collective bargaining. Further, this subsection shall not preclude
negotiations over the procedures and criteria on promotions, transfers,
assignments, demotions, layoffs, suspensions, terminations, discharges, or
other disciplinary actions as subjects of bargaining during collective
bargaining negotiations or negotiations over a memorandum of agreement,
memorandum of understanding, or other supplemental agreement; provided that [such] this
obligation shall not compel either party to agree to a proposal or make a
concession.
Violations
of the procedures and criteria [so] negotiated may be
subject to the grievance procedure in the collective bargaining agreement.
(e) Negotiations relating to contributions to the Hawaii employer-union health benefits trust fund shall be for the purpose of agreeing upon the amounts which the State and counties shall contribute under section 87A-32, toward the payment of the costs for a health benefits plan, as defined in section 87A-1, and group life insurance benefits, and the parties shall not be bound by the amounts contributed under prior agreements; provided that section 89-11 for the resolution of disputes by way of arbitration shall not be available to resolve impasses or disputes relating to the amounts the State and counties shall contribute to the Hawaii employer-union health benefits trust fund.
(f) The repricing of classes within an appropriate bargaining unit shall be negotiated and determined as follows:
(1) Within thirty days of receipt of a written request from the exclusive representative to negotiate and at times allowed under the collective bargaining agreement, the employer shall negotiate the repricing of classes within the bargaining unit. The negotiated repricing actions that constitute cost items shall be subject to the requirements in section 89-10; and
(2) If the employer fails to timely
initiate a negotiation in compliance with paragraph (1) or the parties cannot
reach an agreement within [one hundred fifty] ninety days after
the exclusive representative's written request to negotiate or by January 31 of
a year in which the agreement is due to expire, whichever is earlier, an
impasse exists and the impasse procedures in [section 89-11]
subsection (g) shall apply;
provided
that the parties may mutually agree on repricing procedures in conformance with
this section; provided further that a repricing request can only be submitted
once per occupation in any eighteen-month period; provided further that impasse
procedures shall not apply if the impasse occurs within one hundred eighty days
after a collective bargaining agreement has been reached between the employer
and the exclusive representative of the bargaining unit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, [no]
not more than fifteen repricing impasse
procedures shall be active at any time.
If an impasse procedure would have triggered, but cannot begin because
it would exceed the maximum fifteen active repricing impasse procedures, the parties
shall continue to negotiate until [such]
the time [as]
the repricing impasse procedure begins; provided that preference for new
repricing impasse procedures shall be given to repricings in the order in which
they began.
(g) Within ten days of the date of impasse, the exclusive representative may send a written notice to the employer that the impasse shall be submitted to a final and binding arbitration by a single arbitrator. The single arbitrator shall be selected by mutual agreement of the parties; provided that if the parties fail to select an arbitrator within ten days of the exclusive representative's written notice of arbitration, either party may request the board to furnish a list of five qualified and experienced interest arbitrators from which the arbitrator shall be selected. Within ten days after receipt of the list, the parties shall alternately strike names from the list until a single name is left, whom shall be immediately appointed by the board as the arbitrator; provided that the first party to strike a name from the list shall be determined by lot. The arbitrator shall follow the arbitration procedure as follows:
(1) Arbitration hearing. Within ninety days of appointment, the arbitrator shall commence a hearing; and
(2) Arbitration decision. Within thirty days after the conclusion of the hearing, the arbitrator shall reach and transmit a written decision to the parties for inclusion in the final agreement.
Any deadline or procedure in this subsection may be waived or modified by mutual agreement of the employer and the exclusive representative."
SECTION 2. Section 89-11, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
"(b) An impasse during the term of a collective
bargaining agreement on reopened items or items regarding a supplemental
agreement shall not be subject to the impasse procedures in this section[; provided that an
employer's failure to timely initiate a negotiation on repricing of
classes within a bargaining unit pursuant to section 89-9(f)(1) or the parties'
failure to reach an agreement on repricing within the timeframe set forth in
section 89-9(f)(2) shall constitute an impasse, to which the impasse procedures
in this section shall apply]. The parties may mutually agree on an impasse
procedure, but if the procedure culminates in an arbitration decision, the
decision shall be reached pursuant to subsection (f)."
SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000, and shall be repealed on June 30, 2029; provided that:
(1) Sections 89-9(f) and 89-11(b), Hawaii Revised Statutes, shall be reenacted in the form in which they read on June 30, 2024; and
(2) Any negotiations on repricing pursuant to this Act that started prior to June 30, 2029, may continue after this Act is repealed.
Report Title:
Collective Bargaining in Public Employment; Repricing of Classes; Negotiations; Impasse Procedures; Arbitration
Description:
Amends the collective bargaining negotiation procedure on the repricing of classes within a bargaining unit for public employees. Establishes an impasse procedure to be applied when an employer fails to initiate the negotiation or the parties fail to reach an agreement within 90 days. Repeals existing law that requires a different impasse procedure to apply in those situations. Sunsets 6/30/2029. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
THE SENATE |
S.B. NO. |
2115 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
S.D. 1 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 89-9, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§89-9
Scope of negotiations; consultation[.]; impasse
procedure for repricing.
(a) The employer and the
exclusive representative shall meet at reasonable times, including meetings
sufficiently in advance of the February 1 impasse date under section 89-11, and
shall negotiate in good faith with respect to wages, hours, the amounts of
contributions by the State and respective counties to the Hawaii employer-union
health benefits trust fund to the extent allowed in subsection (e), and other
terms and conditions of employment which are subject to collective bargaining
and which are to be embodied in a written agreement as specified in section
89-10[, but such]; provided that this obligation
does not compel either party to agree to a proposal or make a
concession.
(b) The employer or the exclusive representative desiring to initiate negotiations shall notify the other party in writing, setting forth the time and place of the meeting desired and the nature of the business to be discussed, sufficiently in advance of the meeting.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter,
all matters affecting employee relations, including those that are, or may be,
the subject of a rule adopted by the employer or any director, shall be subject
to consultation with the exclusive representatives of the employees
concerned. The employer shall make every
reasonable effort to consult with exclusive representatives and consider their
input, along with the input of other affected parties, [prior to] before
effecting changes in any major policy affecting employee relations.
(d) Excluded from the subjects of negotiations are matters of classification, reclassification, benefits of but not contributions to the Hawaii employer-union health benefits trust fund, recruitment, examination, initial pricing, and retirement benefits except as provided in section 88-8(h). The employer and the exclusive representative shall not agree to any proposal that would be inconsistent with the merit principle or the principle of equal pay for equal work pursuant to section 76‑1 or that would interfere with the rights and obligations of a public employer to:
(1) Direct employees;
(2) Determine qualifications, standards for work, and the nature and contents of examinations;
(3) Hire, promote, transfer, assign, and retain employees in positions;
(4) Suspend, demote, discharge, or take other disciplinary action against employees for proper cause;
(5) Relieve an employee from duties because of lack of work or other legitimate reason;
(6) Maintain efficiency and productivity, including maximizing the use of advanced technology, in government operations;
(7) Determine methods, means, and personnel by which the employer's operations are to be conducted; and
(8) Take actions as may be necessary to carry out the missions of the employer in cases of emergencies.
This
subsection shall not be used to invalidate provisions of collective bargaining
agreements in effect on and after June 30, 2007, and except as otherwise
provided in this chapter, shall not preclude negotiations over the
implementation of management decisions that affect terms and conditions of
employment that are subject to collective bargaining. Further, this subsection shall not preclude
negotiations over the procedures and criteria on promotions, transfers,
assignments, demotions, layoffs, suspensions, terminations, discharges, or
other disciplinary actions as subjects of bargaining during collective
bargaining negotiations or negotiations over a memorandum of agreement,
memorandum of understanding, or other supplemental agreement; provided that [such] this
obligation shall not compel either party to agree to a proposal or make a
concession.
Violations
of the procedures and criteria [so] negotiated may be
subject to the grievance procedure in the collective bargaining agreement.
(e) Negotiations relating to contributions to the Hawaii employer-union health benefits trust fund shall be for the purpose of agreeing upon the amounts which the State and counties shall contribute under section 87A-32, toward the payment of the costs for a health benefits plan, as defined in section 87A-1, and group life insurance benefits, and the parties shall not be bound by the amounts contributed under prior agreements; provided that section 89-11 for the resolution of disputes by way of arbitration shall not be available to resolve impasses or disputes relating to the amounts the State and counties shall contribute to the Hawaii employer-union health benefits trust fund.
(f) The repricing of classes within an appropriate bargaining unit shall be negotiated and determined as follows:
(1) Within thirty days of receipt of a written request from the exclusive representative to negotiate and at times allowed under the collective bargaining agreement, the employer shall negotiate the repricing of classes within the bargaining unit. The negotiated repricing actions that constitute cost items shall be subject to the requirements in section 89-10; and
(2) If the employer fails to timely
initiate a negotiation in compliance with paragraph (1) or the parties cannot
reach an agreement within [one hundred fifty] ninety days after
the exclusive representative's written request to negotiate or by January 31 of
a year in which the agreement is due to expire, whichever is earlier, an
impasse exists and the impasse procedures in [section 89-11]
subsection (g) shall apply;
provided
that the parties may mutually agree on repricing procedures in conformance with
this section; provided further that a repricing request can only be submitted
once per occupation in any eighteen-month period; provided further that impasse
procedures shall not apply if the impasse occurs within one hundred eighty days
after a collective bargaining agreement has been reached between the employer
and the exclusive representative of the bargaining unit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, [no]
not more than fifteen repricing impasse
procedures shall be active at any time.
If an impasse procedure would have triggered, but cannot begin because
it would exceed the maximum fifteen active repricing impasse procedures, the parties
shall continue to negotiate until [such]
the time [as]
the repricing impasse procedure begins; provided that preference for new
repricing impasse procedures shall be given to repricings in the order in which
they began.
(g) Within ten days of the date of impasse, the exclusive representative may send a written notice to the employer that the impasse shall be submitted to a final and binding arbitration by a single arbitrator. The single arbitrator shall be selected by mutual agreement of the parties; provided that if the parties fail to select an arbitrator within ten days of the exclusive representative's written notice of arbitration, either party may request the board to furnish a list of five qualified and experienced interest arbitrators from which the arbitrator shall be selected. Within ten days after receipt of the list, the parties shall alternately strike names from the list until a single name is left, whom shall be immediately appointed by the board as the arbitrator; provided that the first party to strike a name from the list shall be determined by lot. The arbitrator shall follow the arbitration procedure as follows:
(1) Arbitration hearing. Within ninety days of appointment, the arbitrator shall commence a hearing; and
(2) Arbitration decision. Within thirty days after the conclusion of the hearing, the arbitrator shall reach and transmit a written decision to the parties for inclusion in the final agreement.
Any deadline or procedure in this subsection may be waived or modified by mutual agreement of the employer and the exclusive representative."
SECTION 2. Section 89-11, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
"(b) An impasse during the term of a collective
bargaining agreement on reopened items or items regarding a supplemental
agreement shall not be subject to the impasse procedures in this section[; provided that an
employer's failure to timely initiate a negotiation on repricing of
classes within a bargaining unit pursuant to section 89-9(f)(1) or the parties'
failure to reach an agreement on repricing within the timeframe set forth in
section 89-9(f)(2) shall constitute an impasse, to which the impasse procedures
in this section shall apply]. The parties may mutually agree on an impasse
procedure, but if the procedure culminates in an arbitration decision, the
decision shall be reached pursuant to subsection (f)."
SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on January 1, 2077, and shall be repealed on June 30, 2029; provided that:
(1) Sections 89-9(f) and 89-11(b), Hawaii Revised Statutes, shall be reenacted in the form in which they read on June 30, 2024; and
(2) Any negotiations on repricing pursuant to this Act that started prior to June 30, 2029, may continue after this Act is repealed."
Report Title:
Collective Bargaining in Public Employment; Repricing of Classes; Negotiations; Impasse Procedures; Arbitration
Description:
Amends the collective bargaining negotiation procedure on the repricing of classes within a bargaining unit for public employees. Establishes an impasse procedure to be applied when an employer fails to initiate the negotiation or the parties fail to reach an agreement within 90 days. Repeals existing law that requires a different impasse procedure to apply in those situations. Sunsets 6/30/2029. Effective 1/1/2077. (SD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
THE SENATE |
S.B. NO. |
2115 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
|
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 89-9, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§89-9
Scope of negotiations; consultation[.]; impasse procedure for
repricing. (a) The employer and the exclusive representative
shall meet at reasonable times, including meetings sufficiently in advance of
the February 1 impasse date under section 89-11, and shall negotiate in good
faith with respect to wages, hours, the amounts of contributions by the State
and respective counties to the Hawaii employer-union health benefits trust fund
to the extent allowed in subsection (e), and other terms and conditions of
employment which are subject to collective bargaining and which are to be
embodied in a written agreement as specified in section 89-10[,
but such]; provided that this obligation
does not compel either party to agree to a proposal or make a
concession.
(b) The employer or the exclusive representative desiring to initiate negotiations shall notify the other party in writing, setting forth the time and place of the meeting desired and the nature of the business to be discussed, sufficiently in advance of the meeting.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter,
all matters affecting employee relations, including those that are, or may be,
the subject of a rule adopted by the employer or any director, shall be subject
to consultation with the exclusive representatives of the employees
concerned. The employer shall make every
reasonable effort to consult with exclusive representatives and consider their
input, along with the input of other affected parties, [prior to] before
effecting changes in any major policy affecting employee relations.
(d) Excluded from the subjects of negotiations are matters of classification, reclassification, benefits of but not contributions to the Hawaii employer-union health benefits trust fund, recruitment, examination, initial pricing, and retirement benefits except as provided in section 88-8(h). The employer and the exclusive representative shall not agree to any proposal that would be inconsistent with the merit principle or the principle of equal pay for equal work pursuant to section 76-1 or that would interfere with the rights and obligations of a public employer to:
(1) Direct employees;
(2) Determine qualifications, standards for work, and the nature and contents of examinations;
(3) Hire, promote, transfer, assign, and retain employees in positions;
(4) Suspend, demote, discharge, or take other disciplinary action against employees for proper cause;
(5) Relieve an employee from duties because of lack of work or other legitimate reason;
(6) Maintain efficiency and productivity, including maximizing the use of advanced technology, in government operations;
(7) Determine methods, means, and personnel by which the employer's operations are to be conducted; and
(8) Take actions as may be necessary to carry out the missions of the employer in cases of emergencies.
This
subsection shall not be used to invalidate provisions of collective bargaining
agreements in effect on and after June 30, 2007, and except as otherwise
provided in this chapter, shall not preclude negotiations over the
implementation of management decisions that affect terms and conditions of
employment that are subject to collective bargaining. Further, this subsection shall not preclude
negotiations over the procedures and criteria on promotions, transfers, assignments,
demotions, layoffs, suspensions, terminations, discharges, or other
disciplinary actions as subjects of bargaining during collective bargaining
negotiations or negotiations over a memorandum of agreement, memorandum of
understanding, or other supplemental agreement; provided that [such] this
obligation shall not compel either party to agree to a proposal or make a
concession.
Violations
of the procedures and criteria [so] negotiated may be
subject to the grievance procedure in the collective bargaining agreement.
(e) Negotiations relating to contributions to the Hawaii employer-union health benefits trust fund shall be for the purpose of agreeing upon the amounts which the State and counties shall contribute under section 87A-32, toward the payment of the costs for a health benefits plan, as defined in section 87A-1, and group life insurance benefits, and the parties shall not be bound by the amounts contributed under prior agreements; provided that section 89-11 for the resolution of disputes by way of arbitration shall not be available to resolve impasses or disputes relating to the amounts the State and counties shall contribute to the Hawaii employer-union health benefits trust fund.
(f) The repricing of classes within an appropriate bargaining unit shall be negotiated and determined as follows:
(1) Within thirty days of receipt of a written request from the exclusive representative to negotiate and at times allowed under the collective bargaining agreement, the employer shall negotiate the repricing of classes within the bargaining unit. The negotiated repricing actions that constitute cost items shall be subject to the requirements in section 89-10; and
(2) If the employer fails to timely
initiate a negotiation in compliance with paragraph (1) or the parties cannot
reach an agreement within one hundred fifty days after the exclusive
representative's written request to negotiate or by January 31 of a year in
which the agreement is due to expire, whichever is earlier, an impasse exists
and the impasse procedures in [section 89-11]
subsection (g) shall apply;
provided
that the parties may mutually agree on repricing procedures in conformance with
this section; provided further that a repricing request can only be submitted
once per occupation in any eighteen-month period; provided further that impasse
procedures shall not apply if the impasse occurs within one hundred eighty days
after a collective bargaining agreement has been reached between the employer
and the exclusive representative of the bargaining unit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, [no]
not more than fifteen repricing impasse
procedures shall be active at any time.
If an impasse procedure would have triggered, but cannot begin because
it would exceed the maximum fifteen active repricing impasse procedures, the parties
shall continue to negotiate until [such]
the time [as]
the repricing impasse procedure begins; provided that preference for new
repricing impasse procedures shall be given to repricings in the order in which
they began.
(g) Within ten days of the date of impasse, the exclusive representative may send a written notice to the employer that the impasse shall be submitted to a final and binding arbitration by a single arbitrator. The single arbitrator shall be selected by mutual agreement of the parties; provided that if the parties fail to select an arbitrator within ten days of the exclusive representative's written notice of arbitration, either party may request the board to furnish a list of five qualified and experienced interest arbitrators from which the arbitrator shall be selected. Within days after receipt of the list, the parties shall alternately strike names from the list until a single name is left, whom shall be immediately appointed by the board as the arbitrator; provided that the first party to strike a name from the list shall be determined by lot. The arbitrator shall follow the arbitration procedure as follows:
(1) Arbitration hearing. Within ninety days of appointment, the arbitrator shall commence a hearing; and
(2) Arbitration decision. Within thirty days after the conclusion of the hearing, the arbitrator shall reach and transmit a written decision to the parties for inclusion in the final agreement.
Any deadline or procedure in this subsection may be waived or modified by mutual agreement of the employer and the exclusive representative."
SECTION 2. Section 89-11, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
"(b) An impasse during the term of a collective
bargaining agreement on reopened items or items regarding a supplemental
agreement shall not be subject to the impasse procedures in this section[; provided that an
employer's failure to timely initiate a negotiation on repricing of
classes within a bargaining unit pursuant to section 89-9(f)(1) or the parties'
failure to reach an agreement on repricing within the timeframe set forth in
section 89-9(f)(2) shall constitute an impasse, to which the impasse procedures
in this section shall apply]. The parties may mutually agree on an impasse
procedure, but if the procedure culminates in an arbitration decision, the
decision shall be reached pursuant to subsection (f)."
SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2026, and shall be repealed on June 30, 2029; provided that:
(1) Sections 89-9(f) and 89-11(b), Hawaii Revised Statutes, shall be reenacted in the form in which they read on June 30, 2024; and
(2) Any negotiations on repricing pursuant to this Act that started prior to June 30, 2029, may continue after this Act is repealed."
|
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
|
Report Title:
Collective Bargaining in Public Employment; Repricing of Classes; Negotiations; Impasse Procedures; Arbitration
Description:
Amends the collective bargaining negotiation procedure on the repricing of classes within a bargaining unit for public employees. Establishes an impasse procedure to be applied when an employer fails to initiate the negotiation or the parties fail to reach an agreement within certain timeframes. Repeals existing law that requires a different impasse procedure to apply in those situations. Sunsets 6/30/2029.
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2026 | Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on FIN with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Garrett, Quinlan excused (2). |
| Mar 24, 2026 | Reported from LAB (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1362-26) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to FIN. |
| Mar 19, 2026 | The committee on LAB recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 6 Ayes: Representative(s) Sayama, Lee, M., Garrett, Kapela, Kong, Reyes Oda; Ayes with reservations: none; 0 Noes: none; and 0 Excused: none. |
| Mar 16, 2026 | Bill scheduled to be heard by LAB on Thursday, 03-19-26 9:35AM in House conference room 309 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE. |
| Mar 10, 2026 | Referred to LAB, FIN, referral sheet 15 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | Pass First Reading |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Received from Senate (Sen. Com. No. 9) in amended form (SD 1). |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Report Adopted; Passed Third Reading. Ayes, 24; Aye(s) with reservations: Senator(s) Moriwaki. Noes, 0 (none). Excused, 1 (Senator(s) Gabbard). Transmitted to House. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | One Day Notice 02-24-26. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Reported from WAM (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 2696) with recommendation of passage on Third Reading. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | The committee(s) on WAM recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, UNAMENDED. The votes in WAM were as follows: 11 Aye(s): Senator(s) Dela Cruz, Moriwaki, DeCoite, Elefante, Hashimoto, Inouye, Kanuha, Kim, Lee, C., Wakai, Fevella; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 2 Excused: Senator(s) Kidani, Richards. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | The committee(s) on WAM will hold a public decision making on 02-19-26 10:30AM; Conference Room 211 & Videoconference. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referred to WAM. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Reported from LBT (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 2171) with recommendation of passage on Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referral to WAM. |
| Feb 4, 2026 | The committee(s) on LBT recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in LBT were as follows: 5 Aye(s): Senator(s) Elefante, Lamosao, Ihara, Fevella; Aye(s) with reservations: Senator(s) Moriwaki ; 0 No(es): none; and 0 Excused: none. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | The committee(s) on LBT deferred the measure until 02-04-26 3:00PM; CR 225 & Videoconference. |
| Jan 27, 2026 | The committee(s) on LBT has scheduled a public hearing on 01-30-26 3:00PM; Conference Room 225 & Videoconference. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | Referred to LBT, WAM. |
| Jan 21, 2026 | Introduced and passed First Reading. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | Pending Introduction. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | The committee on LAB recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | House Standing Committee on Labor |
Passed |
|
| Feb 24, 2026 | Third Reading | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Feb 19, 2026 | The committee(s) on WAM recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, UNAMENDED | Senate Standing Committee on Ways and Means |
Passed |
|
| Feb 4, 2026 | The committee(s) on LBT recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | Senate Standing Committee on Labor and Technology |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| County of Honolulu | ** Against | |
| Department of Human Resources Development and the Department of Human Resources of the City | ** Against | |
| Department of Human Resources Development | *** Against | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Hawaii Government Employees Association (AFSCME Local 152) | *** Support | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Hawaii State AFL-CIO | *** Support | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Hawaiʻi State Teachers Association | ** Support | |
| Hawaiʻi State Teachers Association | *** Support | Mar 18, 2026 |
| United Public Workers, AFSCME Local 646, AFL-CIO | *** Support | Mar 18, 2026 |
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 2696
Honolulu, Hawaii
RE: S.B. No. 2115
S.D. 1
Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi
President of the Senate
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2026
State of Hawaii
Sir:
Your Committee on Ways and Means, to which was referred S.B. No. 2115, S.D. 1, entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose and intent of this measure is to amend collective bargaining negotiation procedures.
Specifically, this measure temporarily:
(1) Establishes a procedure for selecting an arbitrator if there is an impasse on the repricing of classes within an applicable bargaining unit, and specifies the arbitration process to be followed; and
(2) Repeals the existing procedure for addressing an impasse on the repricing of classes.
Your Committee received written comments in support of this measure from the United Public Workers, AFSCME Local 646, AFL-CIO; Hawaii State Teachers Association; and Hawaii Government Employees Association.
Your Committee received written comments in opposition to this measure from the Department of Human Resources Development, Department of Human Resources of the County of Hawaii, and Department of Human Resources of the City and County of Honolulu.
Your Committee finds that the current impasse process for the repricing of classes is complex and lengthy, sometimes taking years to resolve. This measure provides a streamlined process with strict deadlines that can help to establish fair compensation amounts for bargaining unit members in a timely manner.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Ways and Means that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 2115, S.D. 1, and recommends that it pass Third Reading.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Ways and Means,
|
|
|
________________________________ DONOVAN M. DELA CRUZ, Chair |
|
|
|
|
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 2171
Honolulu, Hawaii
RE: S.B. No. 2115
S.D. 1
Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi
President of the Senate
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2026
State of Hawaii
Sir:
Your Committee on Labor and Technology, to which was referred S.B. No. 2115 entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING,"
begs leave to report as follows:
The purpose and intent of this measure is to:
(1) Amend the collective bargaining negotiation procedure on the repricing of classes within a bargaining unit for public employees;
(2) Establish an impasse procedure to be applied when an employer fails to initiate the negotiation or the parties fail to reach an agreement within certain timeframes; and
(3) Repeal existing law that requires a different impasse procedure to apply in those situations.
Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Hawaii Government Employees Association, AFSCME Local 152, AFL-CIO; United Public Workers, AFSCME Local 646, AFL-CIO; Hawaiʻi State Teachers Association; and one individual.
Your Committee received testimony in opposition to this measure from the Department of Human Resources Development and the Department of Human Resources of the City and County of Honolulu.
Your Committee finds that existing law governing the collective bargaining negotiation process for the repricing of classes mandates a one-hundred fifty-day negotiating period and if the employer and exclusive representative are unable to reach an agreement within that time period, the impasse procedures under section 89-11, Hawaii Revised Statutes, apply. Your Committee finds, however, that the impasse procedures under section 89-11 are complex and lengthy, as they are intended for resolving impasses arising from new master collective bargaining agreement negotiations and therefore are not well suited for resolving impasses arising from negotiation for the repricing of specific job classifications of employees. This measure promotes the efficient resolution of impasses arising from the repricing negotiations by establishing a separate, streamlined, time-limited impasse procedure tailored to repricing disputes.
Your Committee has amended this measure by:
(1) Reducing the one hundred fifty day repricing negotiating period for repricing of classes to ninety days; to further promote an efficient and timely negotiation process;
(2) Requiring the parties to alternately strike names from the list of five qualified and experienced interest arbitrators furnished by the Hawaii Labor Relations Board until a single name is left, within ten days after receipt of the list; and
(3) Inserting an effective date of January 1, 2077, to encourage further discussion;
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Labor and Technology that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 2115, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as S.B. No. 2115, S.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Ways and Means.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Labor and Technology,
|
|
|
________________________________ BRANDON J.C. ELEFANTE, Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
Testimony PDF
|
|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026 | SB2115_SD1_TESTIMONY_LAB_03-19-26_.PDF |
| Feb 19, 2026 | SB2115_SD1_TESTIMONY_WAM_02-19-26_.PDF |
| Jan 30, 2026 | SB2115_TESTIMONY_LBT_01-30-26_.PDF |
Discussed in Hearing
House Standing Committee on Labor
House Standing Committee on Labor
Senate Standing Committee on Ways and Means
Senate Standing Committee on Labor and Technology
Senate Standing Committee on Public Safety and Military Affairs
Senate Standing Committee on Labor and Technology
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):