HB 738: RELATING TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION.

A BILL FOR AN ACT

RELATING TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

     SECTION 1.  The legislature finds that it is critically important to preserve Hawaii's cultural resources, including historic properties and burial sites, as integral elements of the State's heritage.  The legislature also recognizes the pressing need to expedite housing development, particularly in transit-oriented development areas, to address the housing crisis and create more housing opportunities in close proximity to transportation.

     Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to:

     (1)  Create a process for expediting the review of majority-residential mixed-use transit-oriented development or residential transit-oriented development on certain parcels within county-designated transit-oriented development zones that have a low risk of affecting historically significant resources;

     (2)  Further empower lead agencies, including county agencies, to make determinations on the potential effects of a project;

     (3)  Create a ninety-day or thirty-day limit for the department of land and natural resources to concur or not concur with project effect determinations; and

     (4)  Ensure that projects with written concurrence are exempt from further review unless there is a significant change to the project.

     SECTION 2.  Section 6E-2, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new definition to be appropriately inserted and to read as follows:

     ""Majority-residential mixed-use transit-oriented development" means a mixed-use transit-oriented development project where the majority of the project is residential."

     SECTION 3.  Section 6E-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:

     "(a)  Before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions commences any project [which] that may affect historic property, an aviation artifact, or a burial site, the lead agency [or officer] shall [advise the department] render a determination on the potential effect of the project and allow the department an opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with section 6E-43, especially those listed on the Hawaii register of historic places.  The proposed project shall not be commenced, or if it has already begun, continued, until the department has [given its written concurrence.] been afforded the opportunity to review the project in compliance with this subsection.  If:

     (1)  The proposed project consists of corridors or large land areas;

     (2)  Access to properties is restricted; or

     (3)  Circumstances dictate that construction be done in stages,

the department may give its written concurrence based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be [a] an executed programmatic agreement in place between the department and the project applicant that identifies the entirety of the project scope, project area, and each construction phase and the estimated timelines for each phase[.], and any agreed upon mitigation measures.

     The department shall provide written concurrence or non-concurrence within ninety days after the filing of a request with the department.  [The] If the department fails to provide written concurrence or non-concurrence with a project effect determination within ninety days, or within thirty calendar days if no historic properties are to be affected, of receiving a complete and true project submittal, the lead agency may assume the department's concurrence and the project may move to the next step in the compliance process.

     The agency or officer seeking to proceed with the project, or any person, may appeal the department's concurrence or non-concurrence, or failure to provide written concurrence or non-concurrence within the ninety-day review period, to the Hawaii historic places review board.  An agency, officer, or other person who is dissatisfied with the decision of the review board may apply to the governor, who may take action as the governor deems best in overruling or sustaining the department.

     Once the department has provided written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed project, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political subdivisions may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from further review by the department unless there is a change to the project's physical scope of work or project area or unless additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area; provided that:

     (1)  If there is a change in the project's physical scope of work or project area or if additional historic properties or aviation artifacts are identified within the project area post-review, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions shall notify the department within forty-eight hours of the discovery.  The notification shall include a description of the historic property or aviation artifact and propose actions to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects.  The department shall respond within five business days of the notification with an assessment of the historic property or aviation artifact and shall provide concurrence or non-concurrence with the actions proposed to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects.  The appropriate agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions shall provide the department with a report of the agreed upon actions when they are completed; and

     (2)  If a burial site is inadvertently discovered, the lead agency shall proceed pursuant to section 6E-43 or 6E-43.6, or both, as appropriate.

     For purposes of this subsection:

     "Lead agency" means the entity with the designated responsibility for compliance with this section.  The lead agency shall be decided by the agencies involved; provided that priority shall be given to the agency with the greater degree of involvement with the project.

     "Physical scope of work" means the size, location, and depth of ground disturbance."

     SECTION 4.  Section 6E-10, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:

     "(a)  Before any construction, alteration, disposition or improvement of any nature, by, for, or permitted by a private landowner may be commenced [which] that will affect an historic property on the Hawaii register of historic places, the landowner shall notify the department of the construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature and allow the department opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature on the historic property.  The proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature shall not be commenced, or in the event it has already begun, continue, until the department shall have given its concurrence or ninety days have elapsed.  Within ninety days after notification, the department shall:

     (1)  Commence condemnation proceedings for the purchase of the historic property if the department and property owner do not agree upon an appropriate course of action;

     (2)  Permit the owner to proceed with the owner's construction, alteration, or improvement; or

     (3)  In coordination with the owner, undertake or permit the investigation, recording, preservation, and salvage of any historical information deemed necessary to preserve Hawaiian history, by any qualified agency for this purpose.

     Once the department has provided written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed project, the property owner may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from further review by the department unless there is a change to the project's physical scope of work or project area or unless additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area; provided that:

     (1)  If there is a change in the project's physical scope of work or project area or if additional historic properties or aviation artifacts are identified within the project area post-review, the property owner shall notify the department within forty-eight hours of the discovery.  The notification shall include a description of the historic property or aviation artifact and propose actions to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects.  The department shall respond within five business days of the notification with an assessment of the historic property or aviation artifact and shall provide concurrence or non-concurrence with the actions proposed to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects.  The property owner shall provide the department with a report of the agreed upon actions when they are completed; and

     (2)  If a burial site is inadvertently discovered, the property owner shall proceed pursuant to section 6E-43 or 6E-43.6, or both, as appropriate.

     For the purposes of this subsection, "physical scope of work" means the size, location, and depth of ground disturbance."

     SECTION 5.  Section 6E-42, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

     "§6E-42  Review of proposed projects.  (a)  Except as provided in section 6E-42.2, before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions approves any project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use, which may affect historic property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site, the agency or office shall advise the department and prior to any approval allow the department an opportunity for review and comment on the effect of the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with section 6E-43, including those listed in the Hawaii register of historic places.  If:

     (1)  The proposed project consists of corridors or large land areas;

     (2)  Access to properties is restricted; or

     (3)  Circumstances dictate that construction be done in stages,

the department's review and comment may be based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be a programmatic agreement between the department and the project applicant that identifies each phase and the estimated timelines for each phase.

     Once the department has provided written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed project, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political subdivisions may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from further review by the department unless there is a change to the project's physical scope of work or project area or unless additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area; provided that:

     (1)  If there is a change in the project's physical scope of work or project area or if additional historic properties or aviation artifacts are identified within the project area post-review, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political subdivisions shall notify the department within forty-eight hours of the discovery.  The notification shall include a description of the historic property or aviation artifact and propose actions to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects.  The department shall respond within five business days of the notification with an assessment of the historic property or aviation artifact and shall provide concurrence or non-concurrence with the actions proposed to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects.  The appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political subdivisions shall provide the department with a report of the agreed upon actions when they are completed; and

     (2)  If a burial site is inadvertently discovered, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political subdivisions shall proceed pursuant to section 6E-43 or 6E-43.6, or both, as appropriate.

     For the purposes of this subsection, "physical scope of work" means the size, location, and depth of ground disturbance.

     (b)  The department shall inform the public of any project proposals submitted to it under this section that are not otherwise subject to the requirement of a public hearing or other public notification.

     (c)  Counties deriving and expending revenues on mass transit stations pursuant to section 46-16.8 may request programmatic review by the department for majority-residential mixed-use transit-oriented or residential transit-oriented development where a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement may be required.

     (d)  No later than January 1, 2026, the counties shall work with the department to identify and provide to the department specific parcels in proximity to mass transit stations where majority-residential mixed-use transit-oriented development or residential transit-oriented development is specifically consistent with a comprehensive general plan adopted pursuant to section 46-4; provided that:

     (1)  The counties shall first consult with the department and agree through memorandum on the mass transit stations, and specific transit-oriented development parcels, scoping the potential area for initiating programmatic review; and

     (2)  The counties shall then solicit requests and consent from non-county landowners to have their parcels within the scoped area of the memorandum initiating programmatic review to proceed with the programmatic review process.

     (e)  The department shall review all parcels submitted by the counties pursuant to the scoping memorandum and classify each parcel, within six months of submittal, according to the risk that majority-residential mixed-use transit-oriented development or residential transit-oriented development may pose to historic properties into three categories in order of potential effect level from high to low in the categories of architecture, archaeology, and history and culture; provided that:

     (1)  All county and non-county parcels for programmatic review shall include the county's assessment of whether development on each parcel may affect historic property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site; and

     (2)  This assessment is based on:

          (A)  The Hawaii or national register of historic places;

          (B)  The age of above-surface structures;

          (C)  Any existing archaeological inventory surveys previously accepted by the department;

          (D)  Any burial treatment plans accepted by the department;

          (E)  The type of substrate known to typically contain burials; and

          (F)  Any other literary review relevant to the area.

     (f)  The department shall work with the county that made the submittal to develop and agree on permitting memoranda within three months of classification regarding development best practices, including continued identification, addressing levels of risk for the lower two effect levels in each of the categories, including but not limited to creating photo inventories, conducting an archaeological field survey, archaeological excavation, or onsite archaeological monitoring, and the presence of onsite archaeological monitoring, and consider these best practices as standardized for activities conducted under this section.

     A county shall incorporate by reference these best practices as conditions of approval for any project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use.

     (g)  Parcels identified by the department where all categories are rated in the lower two effect levels shall be considered to comply with subsection (a) or section 6E-8 regarding state or county lands or projects, and any subsequent permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use shall not require referral to or written concurrence from the department on project effect determination and mitigation measures; provided that:

     (1)  The project is:

          (A)  Majority-residential mixed-use transit-oriented; or

          (B)  Residential transit-oriented;

     (2)  The project has reached substantial construction by June 30, 2036; and

     (3)  Development activities have commenced consistent with best practices to address the applicable level of risk.

     (h)  Any parcels characterized as highest risk shall require referral to the department pursuant to subsection (a).

     (i)  Section 6E-43.6 shall apply in the event of an inadvertent discovery of a burial site.

     (j)  The Hawaii housing finance and development corporation may submit to the department any additional parcels for programmatic review if the counties do not provide a submittal pursuant to subsection (d); provided that the same analysis shall be conducted pursuant to subsection (e), and the department shall classify the submittal within six months of receipt.

     (k)  The Hawaii community development authority may submit parcels within its jurisdiction to the department for review, and any parcels identified by the department for which all categories are rated in the lower two effect levels shall be considered to comply with subsection (a) or section 6E-8 regarding state or county lands or projects, and any subsequent permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use shall not require referral to the department; provided that:

     (1)  The project is:

          (A)  Majority-residential mixed-use transit-oriented; or

          (B)  Residential transit-oriented;

     (2)  The project has reached substantial construction by June 30, 2036;

     (3)  Development activities have commenced consistent with best practices to address the applicable level of risk; and

     (4)  The department shall classify the submittal within six months of receipt.

     [(c)] (l)  The department shall adopt rules in accordance with chapter 91 to implement this section."

     SECTION 6.  This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.

     SECTION 7.  Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken.  New statutory material is underscored.

     SECTION 8.  This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.

Report Title:

Historic Preservation; County-designated Transit-oriented Development; SHPD Review; Historic Property

Description:

Creates a process for expediting the review of majority-residential mixed-use transit-oriented development or residential transit-oriented development on certain parcels within county-designated transit-oriented development zones that have a low risk of affecting historically significant resources.  Authorizes lead agencies, including county governments, to make determinations on the potential effects of a project.  Creates a ninety-day limit, or thirty-day if no historic property is to be affected, to concur or not concur with project effect determinations.  Exempts projects with written concurrence from further review unless there is a change to the project or additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area.  Establishes notice and reporting requirements if there is a change to the project or additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area after the initial written concurrence.  Effective 7/1/3000.  (HD2)

The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.

A BILL FOR AN ACT

RELATING TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

     SECTION 1.  The legislature finds that it is critically important to preserve Hawaii's cultural resources, including historic properties and burial sites, as integral elements of the State's heritage.  The legislature also recognizes the pressing need to expedite housing development, particularly in transit-oriented development areas, to address the housing crisis and create more housing opportunities in close proximity to transportation.

     Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to:

     (1)  Create a process for expediting the review of mixed-use transit-oriented development as long as a majority of the mixed-use transit-oriented development is residential, or residential transit-oriented development, on certain parcels within county-designated transit-oriented development zones that have a low risk of affecting historically significant resources;

     (2)  Further empower lead agencies, including county governments, to make determinations on the potential effects of a project;

     (3)  Create a ninety-day or thirty-day limit for the department of land and natural resources to concur or not concur with project effect determinations; and

     (4)  Ensure that projects with written concurrence are exempt from further review unless there is a significant change to the project.

     SECTION 2.  Section 6E-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:

     "(a)  Before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions commences any project [which] that may affect historic property, an aviation artifact, or a burial site, the lead agency [or officer] shall [advise the department] render a determination on the potential effect of the project and allow the department an opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with section 6E-43, especially those listed on the Hawaii register of historic places.  The proposed project shall not be commenced, or if it has already begun, continued, until the department has [given its written concurrence.] been afforded the opportunity to review the project in compliance with this subsection.  If:

     (1)  The proposed project consists of corridors or large land areas;

     (2)  Access to properties is restricted; or

     (3)  Circumstances dictate that construction be done in stages,

the department may give its written concurrence based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be [a] an executed programmatic agreement in place between the department and the project applicant that identifies the entirety of the project scope, project area, and each construction phase and the estimated timelines for each phase[.], and any agreed upon mitigation measures.

     The department shall provide written concurrence or non-concurrence within ninety days after the filing of a request with the department.  [The] If the department fails to provide written concurrence or non-concurrence with a project effect determination within ninety days, or within thirty calendar days if no historic properties are to be affected, of receiving a complete and true project submittal, the lead agency may assume the department's concurrence and the project may move to the next step in the compliance process.

     The agency or officer seeking to proceed with the project, or any person, may appeal the department's concurrence or non-concurrence, or failure to provide written concurrence or non-concurrence within the ninety-day review period, to the Hawaii historic places review board.  An agency, officer, or other person who is dissatisfied with the decision of the review board may apply to the governor, who may take action as the governor deems best in overruling or sustaining the department.

     Once the department has provided written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed project, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political subdivisions may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from further review by the department unless there is a change to the project's physical scope of work or project area or unless additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area.

     For purposes of this subsection:

     "Lead agency" means the entity with the designated responsibility for compliance with this section.  The lead agency shall be decided by the agencies involved; provided that priority shall be given to the agency with the greater degree of involvement with the project.

     "Physical scope of work" means the size, location, and depth of ground disturbance."

     SECTION 3.  Section 6E-10, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:

     "(a)  Before any construction, alteration, disposition or improvement of any nature, by, for, or permitted by a private landowner may be commenced [which] that will affect an historic property on the Hawaii register of historic places, the landowner shall notify the department of the construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature and allow the department opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature on the historic property.  The proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature shall not be commenced, or in the event it has already begun, continue, until the department shall have given its concurrence or ninety days have elapsed.  Within ninety days after notification, the department shall:

     (1)  Commence condemnation proceedings for the purchase of the historic property if the department and property owner do not agree upon an appropriate course of action;

     (2)  Permit the owner to proceed with the owner's construction, alteration, or improvement; or

     (3)  In coordination with the owner, undertake or permit the investigation, recording, preservation, and salvage of any historical information deemed necessary to preserve Hawaiian history, by any qualified agency for this purpose.

     Once the department has provided written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed project, the property owner may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from further review by the department unless there is a change to the project's physical scope of work or project area or unless additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area.

     For the purposes of this subsection, "physical scope of work" means the size, location, and depth of ground disturbance."

     SECTION 4.  Section 6E-42, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

     "§6E-42  Review of proposed projects.  (a)  Except as provided in section 6E-42.2, before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions approves any project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use, which may affect historic property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site, the agency or office shall advise the department and prior to any approval allow the department an opportunity for review and comment on the effect of the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with section 6E-43, including those listed in the Hawaii register of historic places.  If:

     (1)  The proposed project consists of corridors or large land areas;

     (2)  Access to properties is restricted; or

     (3)  Circumstances dictate that construction be done in stages,

the department's review and comment may be based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be a programmatic agreement between the department and the project applicant that identifies each phase and the estimated timelines for each phase.

     Once the department has provided written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed project, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political subdivisions may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from further review by the department unless there is a change to the project's physical scope of work or project area or unless additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area.

     For the purposes of this subsection, "physical scope of work" means the size, location, and depth of ground disturbance.

     (b)  The department shall inform the public of any project proposals submitted to it under this section that are not otherwise subject to the requirement of a public hearing or other public notification.

     (c)  Counties deriving and expending revenues on mass transit stations pursuant to section 46-16.8 may request programmatic review by the department for mixed-use transit-oriented development as long as a majority of the mixed-use transit-oriented development is residential, or residential transit-oriented development, where a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement may be required.

     (d)  No later than January 1, 2026, the counties shall work with the department to identify and provide to the department specific parcels in proximity to mass transit stations where mixed-use transit-oriented development as long as a majority of the mixed-use transit-oriented development is residential, or residential transit-oriented development, is specifically consistent with a comprehensive general plan adopted pursuant to section 46-4; provided that:

     (1)  The counties shall first consult with the department and agree through memorandum on the mass transit stations, and specific transit-oriented development parcels, scoping the potential area for initiating programmatic review; and

     (2)  The counties shall then solicit requests and consent from non-county landowners to have their parcels within the scoped area of the memorandum initiating programmatic review to proceed with the programmatic review process.

     (e)  The department shall review all parcels submitted by the counties pursuant to the scoping memorandum and classify each parcel, within six months of submittal, according to the risk that mixed-use transit-oriented development as long as a majority of the mixed-use transit-oriented development is residential, or residential transit-oriented development, may pose to historic properties into three categories in order of potential effect level from high to low in the categories of architecture, archaeology, and history and culture; provided that:

     (1)  All county and non-county parcels for programmatic review shall include the county's assessment of whether development on each parcel may affect historic property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site; and

     (2)  This assessment is based on:

          (A)  The Hawaii or national register of historic places;

          (B)  The age of above-surface structures;

          (C)  Any existing archaeological inventory surveys previously accepted by the department;

          (D)  Any burial treatment plans accepted by the department;

          (E)  The type of substrate known to typically contain burials; and

          (F)  Any other literary review relevant to the area.

     (f)  The department shall work with the county that made the submittal to develop and agree on permitting memoranda within three months of classification regarding development best practices, including continued identification, addressing levels of risk for the lower two effect levels in each of the categories, including but not limited to creating photo inventories, conducting an archaeological field survey, archaeological excavation, or onsite archaeological monitoring, and the presence of onsite archaeological monitoring, and consider these best practices as standardized for activities conducted under this section.

     A county shall incorporate by reference these best practices as conditions of approval for any project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use.

     (g)  Parcels identified by the department where all categories are rated in the lower two effect levels shall be considered to comply with subsection (a) or section 6E-8 regarding state or county lands or projects, and any subsequent permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use shall not require referral to or written concurrence from the department on project effect determination and mitigation measures; provided that:

     (1)  The project is:

          (A)  Mixed-use transit-oriented as long as a majority of the mixed-use transit-oriented project is residential; or

          (B)  Residential transit-oriented;

     (2)  The project has reached substantial construction by June 30, 2036; and

     (3)  Development activities have commenced consistent with best practices to address the applicable level of risk.

     (h)  Any parcels characterized as highest risk shall require referral to the department pursuant to subsection (a).

     (i)  Section 6E-43.6 shall apply in the event of an inadvertent discovery of a burial site.

     (j)  The Hawaii housing finance and development corporation may submit to the department any additional parcels for programmatic review if the counties do not provide a submittal pursuant to subsection (d); provided that the same analysis shall be conducted pursuant to subsection (e), and the department shall classify the submittal within six months of receipt.

     (k)  The Hawaii community development authority may submit parcels within its jurisdiction to the department for review, and any parcels identified by the department for which all categories are rated in the lower two effect levels shall be considered to comply with subsection (a) or section 6E-8 regarding state or county lands or projects, and any subsequent permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use shall not require referral to the department; provided that:

     (1)  The project is:

          (A)  Mixed-use transit-oriented as long as a majority of the mixed-use transit-oriented project is residential; or

          (B)  Residential transit-oriented;

     (2)  The project has reached substantial construction by June 30, 2036;

     (3)  Development activities have commenced consistent with best practices to address the applicable level of risk; and

     (4)  The department shall classify the submittal within six months of receipt.

     [(c)] (l)  The department shall adopt rules in accordance with chapter 91 to implement this section."

     SECTION 5.  This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.

     SECTION 6.  Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken.  New statutory material is underscored.

     SECTION 7.  This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.

Report Title:

Historic Preservation; County-designated Transit-oriented Development; SHPD Review; Historic Property

Description:

Creates a process for expediting the review of majority residential mixed-use transit-oriented development, or residential transit-oriented development, on certain parcels within county-designated transit-oriented development zones that have a low risk of affecting historically significant resources.  Authorizes lead agencies, including county governments, to make determinations on the potential effects of a project.  Creates a ninety-day limit, or thirty-day if no historic property is to be affected, to concur or not concur with project effect determinations.  Exempts projects with written concurrence from further review unless there is a change to the project or additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area.  Effective 7/1/3000.  (HD1)

The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.

A BILL FOR AN ACT

relating to historic preservation.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:

     SECTION 1.  The legislature finds that it is critically important to preserve Hawaii's cultural resources, including historic properties and burial sites, as integral elements of the State's heritage.  The legislature also recognizes the pressing need to expedite housing development, particularly in transit-oriented development areas, to address the housing crisis and create more housing opportunities in close proximity to transportation.

     Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to:

     (1)  Create a process for expediting the review of residential transit-oriented development on certain parcels within county-designated transit oriented development zones that have a low risk of affecting historically significant resources;

     (2)  Further empower lead agencies, including county governments, to make determinations on the potential effects of a project;

     (3)  Create a ninety-day limit to concur or not concur with project effect determinations; and

     (4)  Ensure that projects with written concurrence are exempt from further review unless there is a significant change to the project.

     SECTION 2.  Section 6E-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:

     "(a)  Before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions commences any project [which] that may affect historic property, an aviation artifact, or a burial site, the lead agency [or officer] shall [advise the department] render a determination on the potential effect of the project and allow the department an opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with section 6E-43, especially those listed on the Hawaii register of historic places.  The proposed project shall not be commenced, or if it has already begun, continued, until the department has [given its written concurrence.] been afforded the opportunity to review the project in compliance with this subsection.  If:

     (1)  The proposed project consists of corridors or large land areas;

     (2)  Access to properties is restricted; or

     (3)  Circumstances dictate that construction be done in stages,

the department may give its written concurrence based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be a programmatic agreement between the department and the project applicant that identifies each phase and the estimated timelines for each phase.

     The department shall provide written concurrence or non-concurrence within ninety days after the filing of a request with the department.  [The] If the department fails to provide written concurrence or non-concurrence with a project effect determination within ninety days, the project may move to the next step in the compliance process.

     The agency or officer seeking to proceed with the project, or any person, may appeal the department's concurrence or non-concurrence to the Hawaii historic places review board.  An agency, officer, or other person who is dissatisfied with the decision of the review board may apply to the governor, who may take action as the governor deems best in overruling or sustaining the department.

     Once the department has provided written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed project, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political subdivisions may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from further review by the department unless there is a significant change to the project's scope of work or project area or unless additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area."

     SECTION 3.  Section 6E-10, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:

     "(a)  Before any construction, alteration, disposition or improvement of any nature, by, for, or permitted by a private landowner may be commenced [which] that will affect an historic property on the Hawaii register of historic places, the landowner shall notify the department of the construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature and allow the department opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature on the historic property.  The proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature shall not be commenced, or in the event it has already begun, continue, until the department shall have given its concurrence or ninety days have elapsed.  Within ninety days after notification, the department shall:

     (1)  Commence condemnation proceedings for the purchase of the historic property if the department and property owner do not agree upon an appropriate course of action;

     (2)  Permit the owner to proceed with the owner's construction, alteration, or improvement; or

     (3)  In coordination with the owner, undertake or permit the investigation, recording, preservation, and salvage of any historical information deemed necessary to preserve Hawaiian history, by any qualified agency for this purpose.

     Once the department has provided written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed project, the property owner may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from further review by the department unless there is a significant change to the project's scope of work or project area or unless additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area."

     SECTION 4.  Section 6E-42, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:

     "§6E-42  Review of proposed projects.  (a)  Except as provided in section 6E-42.2, before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions approves any project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use, which may affect historic property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site, the agency or office shall advise the department and prior to any approval allow the department an opportunity for review and comment on the effect of the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with section 6E-43, including those listed in the Hawaii register of historic places.  If:

     (1)  The proposed project consists of corridors or large land areas;

     (2)  Access to properties is restricted; or

     (3)  Circumstances dictate that construction be done in stages,

the department's review and comment may be based on a phased review of the project; provided that there shall be a programmatic agreement between the department and the project applicant that identifies each phase and the estimated timelines for each phase.

     Once the department has provided written concurrence on the project effect determination and any necessary mitigation measures have been identified and agreed upon for a proposed project, the appropriate agency or officer of the State or any of its political subdivisions may commence the project, and the project shall be exempt from further review by the department unless there is a significant change to the project's scope of work or project area or unless additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area.

     (b)  The department shall inform the public of any project proposals submitted to it under this section that are not otherwise subject to the requirement of a public hearing or other public notification.

     (c)  Counties deriving and expending revenues on mass transit stations pursuant to section 46-16.8 may request programmatic review by the department for residential transit-oriented development where a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement may be required.

     (d)  No later than January 1, 2026, the counties shall work with the department to identify and provide to the department specific parcels in proximity to mass transit stations where residential transit-oriented development is specifically consistent with a comprehensive general plan adopted pursuant to section 46-4; provided that:

     (1)  The counties shall first consult with the department and agree through memorandum on the mass transit stations, and specific transit-oriented development parcels, scoping the potential area for initiating programmatic review; and

     (2)  The counties shall then solicit requests and consent from non-county landowners to have their parcels within the scoped area of the memorandum initiating programmatic review to proceed with the programmatic review process.

     (e)  The department shall review all parcels submitted by the counties pursuant to the scoping memorandum and classify each parcel, within six months of submittal, according to the risk that residential transit-oriented development may pose to historic properties into three categories in order of potential effect level from high to low in the categories of architecture, archaeology, and history and culture; provided that:

     (1)  All county and non-county parcels for programmatic review shall include the county's assessment of whether development on each parcel may affect historic property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site; and

     (2)  This assessment is based on:

          (A)  The Hawaii or national register of historic places;

          (B)  The age of above-surface structures;

          (C)  Any existing archaeological inventory surveys previously accepted by the department;

          (D)  Any burial treatment plans accepted by the department;

          (E)  The type of substrate known to typically contain burials; and

          (F)  Any other literary review relevant to the area.

     (f)  The department shall work with the county that made the submittal to develop and agree on permitting memoranda within three months of classification regarding development best practices, including continued identification, addressing levels of risk for the lower two effect levels in each of the categories, including but not limited to creating photo inventories and the presence of onsite archaeological monitoring, and consider these best practices as standardized for activities conducted under this section.

     A county shall incorporate by reference these best practices as conditions of approval for any project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use.

     (g)  Parcels identified by the department where all categories are rated in the lower two effect levels shall be considered to comply with subsection (a) or section 6E-8 regarding state or county lands or projects, and any subsequent permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use shall not require referral to the department; provided that:

     (1)  The project is only residential transit-oriented;

     (2)  The project has reached substantial construction by June 30, 2036; and

     (3)  Development activities have commenced consistent with best practices to address the applicable level of risk.

     (h)  Any parcels characterized as highest risk shall require referral to the department pursuant to subsection (a).

     (i)  Section 6E-43.6 shall apply in the event of an inadvertent discovery of a burial site.

     (j)  The Hawaii housing finance and development corporation may submit to the department any additional parcels for programmatic review if the counties do not provide a submittal pursuant to subsection (d); provided that the same analysis shall be conducted pursuant to subsection (e), and the department shall classify the submittal within six months of receipt.

     (k)  The Hawaii community development authority may submit parcels within its jurisdiction to the department for review, and any parcels identified by the department for which all categories are rated in the lower two effect levels shall be considered to comply with subsection (a) or section 6E-8 regarding state or county lands or projects, and any subsequent permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use shall not require referral to the department; provided that:

     (1)  The project is only residential transit-oriented;

     (2)  The project has reached substantial construction by June 30, 2036;

     (3)  Development activities have commenced consistent with best practices to address the applicable level of risk; and

     (4)  The department shall classify the submittal within six months of receipt.

     [(c)] (l)  The department shall adopt rules in accordance with chapter 91 to implement this section."

     SECTION 5.  This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.

     SECTION 6.  Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken.  New statutory material is underscored.

     SECTION 7.  This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2025.

Report Title:

Historic Preservation; County-designated Transit-oriented Development; SHPD Review; Historic Property

Description:

Creates a process for expediting the review of residential transit-oriented development on certain parcels within county-designated transit oriented development zones that have a low risk of affecting historically significant resources.  Authorizes lead agencies, including county governments, to make determinations on the potential effects of a project.  Creates a ninety-day limit to concur or not concur with project effect determinations.  Provides that projects with written concurrence are exempt from further review unless there is a significant change to the project or additional historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites are identified within the project area.

The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.

STAND. COM. REP. NO.  600

Honolulu, Hawaii

                , 2025

RE:   H.B. No. 738

      H.D. 2

Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura

Speaker, House of Representatives

Thirty-Third State Legislature

Regular Session of 2025

State of Hawaii

Madame:

     Your Committee on Water & Land, to which was referred H.B. No. 738, H.D. 1, entitled:

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION,"

begs leave to report as follows:

     The purpose of this measure is to:

     (1)  Create a process for expediting the review of majority residential mixed-use transit-oriented development or residential transit-oriented development on certain parcels within county-designated transit-oriented development zones that have a low risk of affecting historically significant resources;

     (2)  Further empower lead agencies, including county agencies, to make determinations on the potential effects of a project;

     (3)  Create a ninety-day or thirty-day limit, as applicable, for the Department of Land and Natural Resources to concur or not concur with project effect determinations; and

     (4)  Ensure that projects with written concurrence are exempt from further review unless there is a significant change to the project.

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Land and Natural Resources; Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation; Holomua Collaborative; Hawai‘i YIMBY; Grassroot Institute of Hawaii; Oahu Metropolitan Planning Organization; NAIOP Hawaii; Hawai‘i Association of REALTORS; and two individuals.  Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Office of Hawaiian Affairs; Hawai‘i Community Development Authority; and Department of Planning and Permitting of the City and County of Honolulu.

     Your Committee finds that the historic preservation review process is necessary to preserve Hawaii's cultural resources, including historic properties and burial sites.  Your Committee further finds that expediting the historic review process for transit-oriented development projects located in areas that have previously been surveyed and found to pose a low risk to historically significant resources will allow the State to address the ongoing housing crisis while still ensuring vital elements of the State's heritage are protected and preserved.

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

     (1)  Establishing a notice and reporting requirement if a change in the project's physical scope or project area or if additional historic properties or aviation artifacts are discovered in the project area after the initial written concurrence is issued;

     (2)  Providing for the treatment of burial sites inadvertently discovered after the initial written concurrence is issued; and

     (3)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Water & Land that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 738, H.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends that it be referred to your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 738, H.D. 2.

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Water & Land,

STAND. COM. REP. NO.  239

Honolulu, Hawaii

                , 2025

RE:   H.B. No. 738

      H.D. 1

Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura

Speaker, House of Representatives

Thirty-Third State Legislature

Regular Session of 2025

State of Hawaii

Madame:

     Your Committee on Housing, to which was referred H.B. No. 738 entitled:

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION,"

begs leave to report as follows:

     The purpose of this measure is to:

     (1)  Create a process for expediting the review of residential transit-oriented development on certain parcels within county-designated transit-oriented development zones that have a low risk of affecting historically significant resources;

     (2)  Further empower lead agencies, including county governments, to make determinations on the potential effects of a project;

     (3)  Create a ninety-day limit to concur or not concur with project effect determinations; and

     (4)  Ensure that projects with written concurrence are exempt from further review unless there is a significant change to the project.

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Land and Natural Resources; Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation; Grassroot Institute of Hawaii; Hawaiʻi YIMBY; NAIOP Hawaii; Holomau Collaborative; and two individuals.  Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Office of Hawaiian Affairs; Hawaii Community Development Authority; and Department of Planning and Permitting of the City and County of Honolulu.

     Your Committee finds that there is an urgent need for more housing development throughout the State, especially in transit-oriented areas.  Your Committee acknowledges that preserving Hawaii's cultural heritage in historic properties and burial sites is essential to the State's identity and history.  This measure will streamline historic property review processes for residential transit-oriented development in areas with low risk to historically significant resources, while empowering agencies to ensure cultural preservation and enabling timely housing construction.

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

     (1)  Expanding the historic property review process to include mixed-use transit-oriented development as long as a majority of the mixed-use transit-oriented development is residential;

     (2)  Clarifying the components of the programmatic agreement between the Department of Land and Natural Resources and the project applicant;

     (3)  Clarifying that if the Department of Land and Natural Resources fails to issue notice or non-concurrence within ninety days, or within thirty days if no historic properties are to be affected, of a complete and true submittal, concurrence is assumed, and the project may proceed;

     (4)  Exempting a project from further review by the Department of Land and Natural Resources unless there is a change to the project's physical scope of work;

     (5)  Specifying that an agent or officer may appeal the Department of Land and Natural Resources' failure to provide written concurrence or non-concurrence within the ninety-day review period;

     (6)  Defining "lead agency";

     (7)  Clarifying what triggers further review of a project by the Department of Land and Natural Resources once the Department has provided written concurrence for state projects, privately owned historic properties, and proposed projects;

     (8)  Expanding the methods to address levels of risk for the lower two effect levels of parcel classifications to include archaeological field surveys, excavation, or onsite monitoring;

     (9)  Changing the effective date to July 1, 3000, to encourage further discussion; and

     (10) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Housing that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 738, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 738, H.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Water & Land.

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Housing,