HB 2612: Mortgages; Debt; Secured Transactions
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: House
- Latest Version Date: 2026-02-19
Current Status:
Failed
(2026-02-20: Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on JHA with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Quinlan excused (1).)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Final Decking
Enacted
Clarifies that a mortgage does not exist independent of the debt it secures and shall not be independently enforceable from the debt. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Clarifies that a mortgage does not exist independent of the debt it secures and shall not be independently enforceable from the debt.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2612 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
H.D. 1 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
RELATING TO MORTGAGES.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 506-1, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§506-1 Lien of mortgages of real property or fixtures; debts secured; priority. (a) Every transfer of an interest in real property or fixtures made as security for the performance of another act or subject to defeasance upon the payment of an obligation, whether the transfer is made in trust or otherwise, is to be deemed a mortgage and shall create a lien only as security for the obligation and shall not be deemed to pass title.
(b)
A mortgage may secure the repayment of past debt, a debt incurred at the
time the mortgage is executed, or a debt incurred for advances which may be
made by the mortgagee subsequent to the execution of the mortgage even though
the mortgagee is under no contractual duty to make these advances. Except as otherwise provided in sections
490:9-334 and 490:9-604 of the Uniform Commercial Code with respect to security
interests in fixtures, a mortgage which secures future advances, up to but not
exceeding the maximum amount of future advances stated in the mortgage, shall
be superior to any subsequently recorded mortgage, lien, or other encumbrances
or conveyance, other than liens for real property taxes and assessments for
public improvements, even though the subsequently recorded mortgage, lien, or
other encumbrance or conveyance is recorded [prior to] before the
date upon which any advance or advances have been made.
(c) A mortgage does not exist independent of the debt it secures and shall not be independently enforceable from the debt."
SECTION 2. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 3. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Report Title:
Mortgages; Debt; Secured Transactions
Description:
Clarifies that a mortgage does not exist independent of the debt it secures and shall not be independently enforceable from the debt. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
2612 |
|
THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 |
|
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating to mortgages.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 506-1, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§506-1 Lien of mortgages of real property or fixtures; debts secured; priority. (a) Every transfer of an interest in real property or fixtures made as security for the performance of another act or subject to defeasance upon the payment of an obligation, whether the transfer is made in trust or otherwise, is to be deemed a mortgage and shall create a lien only as security for the obligation and shall not be deemed to pass title.
(b) A mortgage may secure the repayment of past debt, a debt incurred at the time the mortgage is executed, or a debt incurred for advances which may be made by the mortgagee subsequent to the execution of the mortgage even though the mortgagee is under no contractual duty to make these advances. Except as otherwise provided in sections 490:9-334 and 490:9-604 of the Uniform Commercial Code with respect to security interests in fixtures, a mortgage which secures future advances, up to but not exceeding the maximum amount of future advances stated in the mortgage, shall be superior to any subsequently recorded mortgage, lien, or other encumbrances or conveyance, other than liens for real property taxes and assessments for public improvements, even though the subsequently recorded mortgage, lien, or other encumbrance or conveyance is recorded prior to the date upon which any advance or advances have been made.
(c) A mortgage does not exist independent of the debt it secures and shall not be independently enforceable from the debt."
SECTION 2. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 3. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
|
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
|
Report Title:
Mortgages; Debt; Secured Transactions
Description:
Clarifies that a mortgage does not exist independent of the debt it secures and shall not be independently enforceable from the debt.
The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2026 | Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on JHA with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Quinlan excused (1). |
| Feb 20, 2026 | Reported from CPC (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 757-26) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to JHA. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | The committee on CPC recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 8 Ayes: Representative(s) Matayoshi, Grandinetti, Chun, Ilagan, Ichiyama, Iwamoto, Kong, Tam; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 3 Excused: Representative(s) Lowen, Marten, Pierick. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | Bill scheduled for decision making on Thursday, 02-19-26 2:05PM in conference room 329 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | The committee(s) on CPC recommend(s) that the measure be deferred until 02-19-26. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | Bill scheduled to be heard by CPC on Wednesday, 02-18-26 2:00PM in House conference room 329 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | Referred to CPC, JHA, referral sheet 6 |
| Jan 28, 2026 | Introduced and Pass First Reading. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | The committee on CPC recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS | House Standing Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Collection Law Section, Hawaii State Bar Association | *** Against | Feb 18, 2026 |
| De-Occupy Hawaiʻi | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Food Not Bombs Hawaiʻi | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Hawaii Credit Union League | *** Against | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Hawaii Financial Services Association | *** Against | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Hawaiʻi Alliance for Progressive Action | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Hawaiʻi Filipinos for Truth, Justice and Democracy | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Honolulu Tenants Union | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Hoʻopae Pono Peace Project | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Kōkua Council for Senior Citizens of Hawaiʻi | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Lahaina Community Land Trust | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Law Office of Bianaca Isaki, A Law Corporation | ** Support | |
| Law Office of Bianca Isaki | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Maui Housing Hui | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Maui Medic Healers Hui | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Maui Tomorrow Foundation | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Molokai Community Service Council | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Mortgage Bankers Association of Hawaii | *** Against | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Mutual Aid Lahui | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Nā Aikane o Maui | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Representative Tina Nakada Grandinetti | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Share Your Mana | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
| West Maui Preservation Association | *** Support | Feb 18, 2026 |
STAND. COM. REP. NO. 757-26
Honolulu, Hawaii
, 2026
RE: H.B. No. 2612
H.D. 1
Honorable Nadine K. Nakamura
Speaker, House of Representatives
Thirty-Third State Legislature
Regular Session of 2026
State of Hawaii
Madame:
Your Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce, to which was referred H.B. No. 2612 entitled:
"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO MORTGAGES,"
begs leave to report as follows:
Your Committee finds that the Hawaii Supreme Court held in The Bank of New York Mellon v. White, 573 P.3d 629, 156 Haw. 246 (2025), that the statute of limitations for a foreclosure action is twenty years. This decision determined that the remedies for enforcing an underlying note and foreclosing a mortgage are individually governed by different statutes of limitations, where the period of limitation for debt recovery actions is six years compared with the twenty years for foreclosures held by the Court.
Your Committee further finds that White creates a new enforcement pathway that circumvents the statute of limitations for the debt itself by permitting mortgages to foreclose years after the underlying note becomes time-barred. By severing the obligations, this undermines debtor protections and incentivizes creditor inaction. If the foreclosure remedy is extended to twenty years independently of the debt, mortgagees who took no action during the contract limitations period can now revive enforcement against homeowners even in cases involving long-resolved financial hardship. The effect will be to resurrect a significant backlog of aged mortgages, destabilizing communities still recovering from the last foreclosure wave. This measure overrides White by clarifying that the mortgage does not exist independent of the debt it secures and cannot be enforced independently of the debt.
Your Committee has amended this measure by:
(1) Changing the effective date to July 1, 3000, to encourage further discussion; and
(2) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.
Your Committee notes that there is a factual question as to whether a mortgage, before the decision in Bowler v. Christiana Trust, a Division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, 2018 WL 4659562 (Haw. App. 2018), could be foreclosed after the six-year statutes of limitation had run on the underlying note. Your Committee respectfully requests your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs, should it deliberate on this measure, to best determine the answer to this query.
As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2612, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2612, H.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce,
|
|
|
____________________________ SCOT Z. MATAYOSHI, Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
Testimony PDF
|
|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2026 | HB2612_TESTIMONY_CPC_02-18-26_.PDF |
Discussed in Hearing
House Standing Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce
House Standing Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
House Standing Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce
House Standing Committee on Consumer Protection & Commerce
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):